Black box arguments

Argumentation

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 437-446

  Jackson, Sally ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Abstinence only sex education; Controversy; Politicization of science

Indexed keywords

EID: 48349094386     PISSN: 0920427X     EISSN: 15728374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-008-9094-y     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Jackson, S. 1989. Method as argument. In Spheres of argument: Proceedings of the Sixth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation, ed. B. Gronbeck, 1-8. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
2. Jackson, S. 1992. "Virtual standpoints" and the pragmatics of conversational argument. In Argumentation Illuminated, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J.A. Blair, and Ch.A. Willard, 260-269. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
3. Jackson, S., and D. Brashers. 2002. Assessing the problem validity of argumentation templates: Statistical rules of thumb. In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of The International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, J.A. Blair, Ch.A. Willard, and A.F. Snoeck Henkemans, 547-552. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
4. Jackson, S., and S. Jacobs. 1980. Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthymeme. Quarterly Journal of Speech 66: 251-265.
5. Jackson, S., and S. Jacobs. 2006. Designing countermoves to questionable argumentative tactics. In Contemporary perspectives on argumentation: Views from the Venice Argumentation Conference. ed. F.H. van Eemeren, M.D. Hazen, P. Houtlosser, and D.C. Williams, 83-100. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
6. Jacobs, S., and S. Jackson. 1982. Conversational argument: A discourse analytic approach. In Advances in argumentation theory and research, ed. J.R. Cox and Ch.A. Willard, 205-237. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
7. Jacobs, S., and S. Jackson. 1989. Building a model of conversational argument. In Rethinking communication: Paradigm exemplars, ed. B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B. O'Keefe, and E. Wartella, 153-171. Beverly Hills/Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Jacobs, S., and S. Jackson. 2006. Derailments of argumentation: It takes two to tango. In Considering pragma-dialectics, ed. P. Houtlosser and A. van Rees, 121-133. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Latour, B. 1987. Science in action. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
10. McCloskey, D.N. 1985. The rhetoric of economics. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
11. Underhill, K., P. Montgomery, and D. Operario. 2007. Sexual abstinence only programmes to prevent HIV infection in high income countries: a systematic review. BMJ (British Medical Journal) 335: 248-252.
12. van Eemeren, F.H., R. Grootendorst, S. Jackson, and S. Jacobs. 1993. Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama.
13. Walton, D.N. 1989. Appeals to authority. In Informal logic: A handbook for critical argumentation (Chap. 7). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Willard, Ch.A. 1990. On authority. Informal Logic, 12: 11-12.