Contingent capture and inhibition of return: A comparison of mechanisms

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 214, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 47-60

  Prinzmetal, William ^a   Taylor, Jordan A ^a   Myers, Loretta Barry ^a   Nguyen Espino, Jacqueline ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Contingent capture; Exogenous attention; Inhibition of return; Involuntary attention

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INHIBITION OF RETURN; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SPATIAL ORIENTATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; CUES; DECISION MAKING; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROBABILITY; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 80053937874     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: 14321106     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2805-x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. N Al-Aidroos RM Guo J Pratt 2010 You can't stop new motion: attentional capture despite a control set for colour Visl Cogn 18 6 859 880 10.1080/13506280903343085
2. N Al-Aidroos S Harrison J Pratt 2010 Attentional control settings prevent abrupt onsets from capturing visual spatial attention Q J Exp Psychol 63 1 31 41 10.1080/17470210903150738
3. U Ansorge M Heumann 2003 Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: the roles of color and location J Exp Psychol Human 29 5 937 948 10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.937 (Pubitemid 37417283)
4. WF Bacon HE Egeth 1994 Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture Percept Psychophys 55 5 485 496 8008550 10.3758/BF03205306 1:STN:280: DyaK2c3nslOmsA%3D%3D
5. P Bartolomeo C Decaix E Siéroff 2007 The phenomenology of endogenous orienting Conscious Cogn 16 1 144 161 16527491 10.1016/j.concog.2005. 09.002 (Pubitemid 44881352)
6. A Berger A Henik R Rafal 2005 Competition between endogenous and exogenous orienting of visual attention J Exp Psychol Gen 134 2 207 221 15869346 10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.207 (Pubitemid 40687792)
7. S Brown A Heathcote 2005 A ballistic model of choice response time Psychol Rev 112 1 117 128 15631590 10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.117 (Pubitemid 40131522)
8. Brown SD, Heathcote A (2008) The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation. Cognitive Psychol 57(3):153-178
9. BR Burnham 2007 Displaywide visual features associated with a search display's appearance can mediate attentional capture Psychon Bull Rev 14 3 392 422 17874581 10.3758/BF03194082
10. C Donkin S Brown A Heathcote E Wagenmakers 2011 Diffusion versus linear ballistic accumulation: different models but the same conclusions about psychological processes? Psychon Bull Rev 18 1 61 69 21327360 10.3758/s13423-010-0022-4
11. BA Dosher S Han ZL Lu 2004 Parallel processing in visual search asymmetry J Exp Psychol Human 30 1 3 27 10.1037/0096-1523.30.1.3 (Pubitemid 38213795)
12. M Esterman W Prinzmetal J Degutis A Landau E Hazeltine T Verstynen L Robertson 2008 Voluntary and involuntary attention affect face discrimination differently Neuropsychologia 46 4 1032 1040 18166203 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia. 2007.11.014
13. CL Folk RW Remington JC Johnston 1992 Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings J Exp Psychol Human 18 1030 1044 10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030 1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2FlslaksQ%3D%3D
14. CL Folk RW Remington JH Wright 1994 The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color J Exp Psychol Human 20 2 317 329 10.1037/0096-1523.20.2.317 1:STN:280: DyaK2c3ks1emsQ%3D%3D
15. MJ Funes J Lupianez B Milliken 2007 Separate mechanisms recruited by exogenous and endogenous spatial cues: evidence from a spatial Stroop paradigm J Exp Psychol Human 33 2 348 362 10.1037/0096-1523.33.2.348
16. BS Gibson J Amelio 2000 Inhibition of return and attentional control settings Percept Psychophys 62 3 496 504 10909240 10.3758/BF03212101 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvjvFygtw%3D%3D
17. GR Grice 1968 Stimulus intensity and response evocation Psychol Rev 75 5 359 373 4879423 10.1037/h0026287 1:STN:280:DyaF1M%2FhsFyqug%3D%3D
18. J Ivanoff RM Klein 2001 The presence of a nonresponding effector increases inhibition of return Psychon Bull Rev 8 2 307 314 11495119 10.3758/BF03196166 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvkvFelug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 33604181)
19. Jonides J (1976) Voluntary versus reflexive control of the mind's eye's movement. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St Louis
20. Jonides J (1981) Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In: Long JB, Baddeley AD (eds) Attention and performance IX. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 187-204
21. JM Kincade RA Abrams SV Astafiev GL Shulman M Corbetta 2005 An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study of voluntary and stimulus-driven orienting of attention J Neurosci 25 18 4593 4604 15872107 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0236-05.2005 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXkt1WnsL4%3D (Pubitemid 40629150)
22. RM Klein WJ MacInnes 1999 Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search Psychol Sci 10 4 346 352 10.1111/1467-9280.00166
23. Klein RM, Taylor TL (1994) Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. In: Dagenbach D, Carr TH (eds) Academic Press, chap 133, pp 133-150
24. AN Landau M Esterman LC Robertson S Bentin W Prinzmetal 2007 Different effects of voluntary and involuntary attention on EEG activity in the gamma band J Neurosci 27 44 11986 11990 17978039 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3092-07.2007 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtlSktrrJ (Pubitemid 350072085)
25. CJH Ludwig S Farrell LA Ellis ID Gilchrist 2009 The mechanism underlying inhibition of saccadic return Cognitive Psychol 59 2 180 202 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.04.002
26. J Lupiáñez EG Milan FJ Tornay E Madrid P Tudela 1997 Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later Percept Psychophys 59 8 1241 1254 9401458 10.3758/BF03214211 (Pubitemid 127459262)
27. EA Maylor R Hockey 1985 Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space J Exp Psychol Human 11 777 787 10.1037/0096-1523.11.6.777 1:STN:280:DyaL28%2FoslyjsA%3D%3D
28. JT Mordkoff R Halterman P Chen 2008 Why does the effect of short-SOA exogenous cuing on simple RT depend on the number of display locations? Psychon Bull Rev 15 4 819 824 18792510 10.3758/PBR.15.4.819
29. JA Nelder R Mead 1965 A simplex method for function minimization Comput J 7 4 308 313
30. MI Posner 1980 Orienting of attention Q J Exp Psychol-A 32 3 25 10.1080/00335558008248231 1:STN:280:DyaL3c7mslOrtg%3D%3D
31. Posner M, Boies S (1971) Components of attention. Psychol Rev 75:391-408
32. Posner MI, Cohen Y (1984) Components of visual orienting. In: Bouma H, Bouwhuis DG (eds) Attention and performance X. Lawrance Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 531-556
33. J Pratt JJ Adam J McAuliffe 1998 The spatial relationship between cues and targets mediates inhibition of return Can J Exp Psychol 52 4 213 216 (Pubitemid 128656094)
34. J Pratt AB Sekuler J McAuliffe 2001 The role of attentional set on attentional cueing and inhibition of return Vis Cogn 8 1 33 46 10.1080/13506280042000018 (Pubitemid 32166382)
35. W Prinzmetal S Park R Garrett 2005 Involuntary attention and identification accuracy Percept Psychophys 67 8 1344 1353 16555586 10.3758/BF03193639 (Pubitemid 43555077)
36. W Prinzmetal A Zvinyatskovskiy P Gutierrez L Dilem 2009 Voluntary and involuntary attention have different consequences: the effect of perceptual difficult Q J Exp Psychol-A 62 2 352 369 10.1080/17470210801954892
37. W Prinzmetal R Ha A Khani 2010 The mechanisms of involuntary attention J Exp Psychol Human 36 2 255 267 10.1037/a0017600
38. R Ratcliff JN Rouder 1998 Modeling response times for two-choice decisions Psychol Sci 9 5 347 356 10.1111/1467-9280.00067 (Pubitemid 128150583)
39. R Rauschenberger 2003 Attentional capture by auto- and allo-cues Psychon Bull Rev 10 4 814 842 15000532 10.3758/BF03196545 (Pubitemid 38483380)
40. PA Reuter-Lorenz AP Jha JN Rosenquist 1996 What is inhibited in inhibition of return? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22 2 367 378 8934850 10.1037/0096-1523.22.2.367 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FovV2nsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 126418401)
41. M Ruz J Lupianez 2002 A review of attentional capture: on its automaticity and sensitivity to endogenous control Psicologica 23 2 283 309
42. PL Smith R Ratcliff 2009 An integrated theory of attention and decision making in visual signal detection Psychol Rev 116 2 283 317 19348543 10.1037/a0015156
43. PL Smith R Ratcliff BJ Wolfgang 2004 Attention orienting and the time course of perceptual decisions: response time distributions with masked and unmasked displays Vision Res 44 12 1297 1320 15066392 10.1016/j.visres.2004.01. 002 (Pubitemid 38447064)
44. J Theeuwes 2004 Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture Psychon Bull Rev 11 1 65 70 15116988 10.3758/BF03206462 (Pubitemid 38652033)
45. M Usher JL McClelland 2001 The time course of perceptual choice: the Leaky, competing accumulator model Psychol Rev 108 3 550 592 11488378 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.550 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mvkt1Wltw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 33604137)
46. J Vandekerckhove F Tuerlinckx 2008 Diffusion model analysis with MATLAB: a DMAT primer Behav Res Methods 40 1 61 72 18411528 10.3758/BRM.40.1.61
47. UW Weger RA Abrams MB Law J Pratt 2008 Attending to objects: endogenous cues can produce inhibition of return Vis Cogn 16 5 659 674 10.1080/ 13506280701229247 (Pubitemid 351958848)
48. RD Wright CM Richard 2000 Location cue validity affects inhibition of return of visual processing Vision Res 40 17 119 126 10.1016/S0042-6989(00) 00085-7 (Pubitemid 30601726)