Attending to objects: Endogenous cues can produce inhibition of return

Visual Cognition

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 659-674

  Weger, Ulrich W ^a   Abrams, Richard A ^b   Law, Mark B ^b   Pratt, Jay ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE DISPLAY; LATENT PERIOD; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL DETECTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 46949108874     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280701229247     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Abrams, R. A. and Dobkin, R. S. (1994) Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, pp. 467-477.
2. Abrams, R. A. and Law, M. B. (2000) Object-based visual attention with endogenous orienting. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, pp. 818-833.
3. Danzinger, S. and Kingstone, A. (1999) Unmasking the inhibition of return phenomenon. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, pp. 1024-1037.
4. Egly, R., Driver, J. and Rafal, R. D. (1994) Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, pp. 161-177.
5. Frischen, A. and Tipper, S. P. (2004) Orienting attention via observed gaze shift evokes longer term inhibitory effects: Implications for social interactions, attention and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, pp. 516-533.
6. Hommel, B., Pratt, J., Colzato, L. and Godjin, R. (2001) Symbolic control of visual attention. Psychological Science, 12, pp. 360-365.
7. Jordan, H. and Tipper, S. P. (1999) Spread of inhibition across an object's surface. British Journal of Psychology, 90, pp. 495-507.
8. Klein, R. M. (2000) Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, pp. 138-147.
9. Klein, R. and MacInnes, W. J. (1999) Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, pp. 346-352.
10. Lamy, D. and Tsal, Y. (2000) Object features, object locations, and object files: Which does selective attention activate and when?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, pp. 1387-1400.
11. Leek, E., Reppa, I. and Tipper, S. (2003) Inhibition of return for objects and locations in static displays. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, pp. 388-395.
12. Lupianez, J., Decaix, C., Sieroff, E., Chokron, S., Milliken, B. and Bartolomeo, P. (2004) Independent effects of endogenous and exogenous spatial cueing: Inhibition of return at endogenously attended target locations. Experimental Brain Research, 159, pp. 447-457.
13. McAuliffe, J. and Pratt, J. (2005) The role of temporal and spatial factors in the covert orienting of visual attention tasks. Psychological Research, 69, pp. 285-291.
14. Mondor, T. A., Breau, L. M. and Milliken, B. (1998) Inhibitory processes in auditory selective attention: Evidence of location-based and frequency-based inhibition of return. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, pp. 296-302.
15. Mueller, H. J. and Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989) Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, pp. 315-330.
16. Posner, M. I. and Cohen, Y. (1984) Components of visual orienting. Attention and performance X: Control of language processes, pp. 531-556. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd, Hove, UK
17. Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S. and Vaughan, J. (1985) Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, pp. 211-228.
18. Pratt, J. and Abrams, R. A. (1999) Inhibition of return in discrimination tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, pp. 229-242.
19. Pratt, J., Hillis, J. and Gold, J. (2001) The effect of the physical characteristics of cues and targets on facilitation and inhibition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, pp. 489-495.
20. Pratt, J. and Hommel, B. (2003) Symbolic control of visual attention: The role of working memory and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, pp. 835-845.
21. Rafal, R. D., Calabresi, P. A., Brennan, C. W. and Sciolto, T. K. (1989) Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, pp. 673-685.
22. Roelofs, K., van Galen, G. P., Eling, P., Keijsers, G. P. J. and Hoogduin, C. A. L. (2003) Endogenous and exogenous attention in patients with conversion paresis. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, pp. 733-745.
23. Taylor, T. L. and Klein, R. M. (2000) Visual and motor effects in inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, pp. 1639-1656.
24. Theeuwes, J. and Godijn, R. (2002) Irrelevant singletons capture attention: Evidence from inhibition of return. Perception and Psychophysics, 64, pp. 764-770.
25. Theeuwes, J., Godijn, R. and Pratt, J. (2004) A new estimation of the duration of attentional dwell time. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, pp. 60-64.
26. Tipper, S. P., Driver, J. and Weaver, B. (1991) Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, pp. 289-298.
27. Weaver, B., Lupianez, J. and Watson, F. L. (1998) The effects of practice on object-based, location-based, and static-display inhibition of return. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, pp. 993-1003.
28. Wolfe, J. M., Alvarez, G. A. and Horowitz, T. S. (2000) Attention is fast but volition is slow. Nature, 406, p. 691.