Probabilistic calibration of a distributed hydrological model for flood forecasting;Calage probabiliste d'un modèle hydrologique distribué pour la prévision des crues

Hydrological Sciences Journal

Volumn 56, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1129-1149

  Mediero, L ^a   Garrote, L ^a   Martin Carrasco F J ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Flood forecasting; Multi objective calibration; RIBS model

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION METHOD; CALIBRATION METHODOLOGIES; DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGICAL MODEL; ESTIMATION ERRORS; FLOOD FORECASTING; FLOOD HYDROGRAPHS; HYBRID METHOD; HYDROGRAPHS; HYDROLOGICAL MODELS; MODEL ESTIMATES; MULTI-OBJECTIVE CALIBRATION; PROBABILISTIC APPROACHES; PROBABILITY FUNCTIONS; RIBS MODEL; RIVER BASINS; SINGLE OBJECTIVE;

CALIBRATION; CLIMATE MODELS; ESTIMATION; FLOOD CONTROL; FLOODS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; USER INTERFACES; WEATHER FORECASTING;

PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

CALIBRATION; ERROR ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; FLOOD FORECASTING; HYDROGRAPH; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; NUMERICAL MODEL; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; REAL TIME;

EID: 80053902087     PISSN: 02626667     EISSN: 21503435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2011.610322     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Abbaspour, K.C., et al., 2007. Spatially-distributed modelling of hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT. Journal of Hydrology, 333, 413-430.
2. Beven, K.J., 2001. Rainfall-runoff modelling: The primer. Chichester: Wiley.
3. Beven, K.J., 2006. A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. Journal of Hydrology, 320, 18-36.
4. Beven, K.J. and Binley, A.M., 1992. The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrological Processes, 6, 279-298.
5. Boyle, D.P., Gupta, H.V. and Sorooshian, S., 2000. Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods. Water Resources Research, 36 (12), 3663-3674.
6. Boyle, D.P., et al., 2001. Toward improved streamflow forecasts: value of semidistributed modelling. Water Resources Research, 37 (11), 2749-2759.
7. Cabral, M.C., Garrote, L., Bras, R.L. and Entekhabi, D., 1992. A kinematic model of infiltration and runoff generation in layered and sloped soils. Advances in Water Resources, 15 (5), 311-324.
8. Cheng, C.T., Wu, X.Y. and Chau, K.W., 2005. Multiple criteria rainfall-runoff model calibration using a parallel genetic algorithm in a cluster of computers. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 50 (6), 1069-1087.
9. CYII, 2003. Normas de Explotación de las presas de Navacerrada y Santillana. Canal de Isabel II, Madrid, Spain.
10. De Vos, N.J. and Rientjes, T.H.M., 2007. Multi-objective performance comparison of an artificial neural network and a conceptual rainfall-runoff model. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 52 (3), 397-413.
11. Efstratiadis, A., et al., 2008. HYDROGEIOS: a semi-distributed GISbased hydrological model for modified river basins. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 12, 989-1006.
12. Efstratiadis, A. and Koutsoyiannis, D., 2010. One decade of multiobjective calibration approaches in hydrological modelling: a review. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 55 (1), 58-78.
13. Engeland, K., Xu, C.Y. and Gottschalk, L., 2005. Assessing uncertainties in a conceptual water balance model using Bayesian methodology. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 50 (1), 45-63.
14. Fenicia, F., Savenije, H.H.G., Matgen, P. and Pfister, L., 2007. Comparison of alternative multiobjective calibration strategies for hydrological modelling. Water Resources Research, 43 (3), W03434.
15. Feyen, L., Kalas, M. and Vrugt, J.A., 2008. Semi-distributed parameter optimization and uncertainty assessment for large-scale streamflow simulation using global optimization. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 53 (2), 293-308.
16. Foglia, L., Hill, M.C., Mehl, S.W. and Burlando, P., 2009. Sensitivity analysis, calibration, and testing of a distributed hydrological model using error-based weighting and one objective function. Water Resources Research, 45, W06427.
17. Frances, F., Velez, J.I. and Velez, J.J., 2007. Split-parameter structure for the automatic calibration of distributed hydrological models. Journal of Hydrology, 332 (1-2), 226-240.
18. Freer, J., Beven, K.J. and Ambroise, B., 1996. Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in runoff prediction and the value of data: An application of the GLUE approach. Water Resources Research, 32 (7), 2161-2173.
19. Garrote, L. and Bras, R.L., 1995a. A distributed model for realtime forecasting using digital elevation models. Journal of Hydrology, 167, 279-306.
20. Garrote, L. and Bras, R.L., 1995b. An integrated software environment for real-time use of a distributed hydrologic model. Journal of Hydrology, 167, 307-326.
21. Girón, F., 1988. The evacuation of floods during the operation of reservoirs. Beijing, China: Transactions of the Sixteenth International Congress on Large Dams, vol. 4, Report 25, 403-417.
22. Goldberg, D.E., 1989. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. New York: Addison-Wesley.
23. Gotay, J. and Pedreira M.C., 2003. Calibración de modelos conceptuales de precipitación-escurrimientos, usando optimización global. Ingenieria Hidraulica en Mexico, 18 (1), 55-73 (in Spanish).
24. Gupta, H.V., Sorooshian, S. and Yapo P.O., 1998. Toward improvement calibration of hydrologic models: multiple and noncommensurable measures of information. Water Resources Research, 34 (4), 751-763.
25. Gupta, H.V., Sorooshian, S. and Yapo, P.O., 1999. Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: comparison with multilevel expert calibration. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 4 (2), 135-143.
26. Kavetski, D., Kuczera, G. and Franks, S.W., 2006. Calibration of conceptual hydrological models revisited: 1. Overcoming numerical artefacts. Journal of Hydrology, 320, 173-186.
27. Khu, S.T. and Madsen, H., 2005. Multiobjective calibration with Pareto preference ordering: an application to rainfall-runoff model calibration. Water Resources Research, 41, W03004.
28. Krzysztofowicz, R. and Maranzano, C.J., 2004. Hydrological uncertainty processor for probabilistic stage transition forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 293, 57-73.
29. Kuczera, G. and Parent, E., 1998. Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: the Metropolis algorithm. Journal of Hydrology, 211, 69-85.
30. Lei, X.H., Chen, N. and Jiang, Y.Z., 2009. Parameters auto calibration with modified SWAT model in Beijing. River Basin Research and Planning Approach, 219-227.
31. Madsen, H., 2000. Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using multiple objectives. Journal of Hydrology, 235, 276-288.
32. Mediero, L., 2007. A probabilistic forecast of floods by Bayesian networks applied to a distributed rainfall-runoff model. Thesis (Doctor), Technical University of Madrid, Department of Civil Engineering: Hydraulics and Energetics.
33. Mediero, L., Garrote, L. and Martín-Carrasco, F., 2007. A probabilistic model to support reservoir operation decisions during flash floods. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 52 (3), 523-537.
34. MMA (Ministerio de Medio Ambiente), 1998. Normas de Explotación, Conservación y Vigilancia de la presa de El Pardo. Madrid: Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Confederación Hidrográfica del Tajo (in Spanish).
35. Montanari, A., 2005. Large sample behaviours of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) in assessing the uncertainty of rainfall-runoff simulations. Water Resources Research, 41, W08406.
36. Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I-A discussion of principles, Journal of Hydrology, 10 (3), 282-290.
37. Perrin, C., et al., 2007. Impact of limited streamflow data on the efficiency and the parameters of rainfall-runoff models. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 52 (1), 131-151.
38. Rozos, E., Efstratiadis, A., Nalbantis, I. and Koutsoyiannis, D., 2004. Calibration of a semi-distributed model for conjunctive simulation of surface and groundwater flows. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 49 (5), 819-842.
39. Schaefli, B., Talamba, D.B. and Musy, A., 2007. Quantifying hydrological modeling errors trough a mixture of normal distributions. Journal of Hydrology, 332, 303-315.
40. Spear, R.C. and Hornberger, G.M., 1980. Eutrophication in Peel Inlet-II. Identification of critical uncertainties via generalized sensitivity analysis. Water Research, 14, 43-49.
41. Uhlenbrook, S., Seibert, J., Leibundgut, C. and Rodhe, A., 1999. Prediction uncertainty of conceptual rainfall-runoff models caused by problems in identifying model parameters and structure. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 44 (5), 779-797.
42. Vrugt, J.A., Bouten, W., Gupta, H.V. and Sorooshian, S., 2002. Toward improved identifiability of hydrologic model parameters: the information content of experimental data. Water Resources Research, 38 (12), 48-1 to 48-13.
43. Vrugt, J.A., Gupta, H.V., Bouten, W. and Sorooshian, S., 2003a. A shuffled complex evolution Metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters. Water Resources Research, 39 (8), 1201, SWC 1-1-SWC 1-15.
44. Vrugt, J.A., Gupta, H.V., Bastidas, L.A., Bouten, W. and Sorooshian S., 2003b. Effective and efficient algorithm for multiobjective optimization of hydrologic models. Water Resources Research, 39 (8), 1214, SWC 5-1-SWC 5-19.
45. Vrugt, J.A., et al, 2008. Treatment of input uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: doing hydrology backwards with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. Water Resources Research, 44, W00B09.
46. Wagener, T, et al., 2001. A framework for development and application of hydrological models. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 5 (1), 13-26.
47. Wagener, T., Wheater, H.S. and Gupta, H.V., 2004. Rainfall-runoff modelling in gauged and ungauged catchments, London: Imperial College Press.
48. Werkhoven, K., Wagener, T., Reed, P. and Tang, Y., 2009. Sensitivityguided reduction of parametric dimensionality for multiobjective calibration of watershed models. Advances in Water Resources, 32 (8), 1154-1169.
49. Xiong, L. and O'Connor, K.M., 2008. An empirical method to improve the prediction limits on the GLUE methodology in rainfall-runoff modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 349, 115-124.
50. Yang, J., et al., 2008. Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe basin in China, Journal of Hydrology, 358, 1-23.
51. Yapo, P.O., Gupta, H.V. and Sorooshian, S., 1996. Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: sensitivity to calibration data. Journal of Hydrology, 181, 23-48.
52. Yapo, P.O., Gupta, H.V. and Sorooshian, S., 1998. Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models. Journal of Hydrology, 204, 83-97.