CT colonography in a Korean population with a high residue diet: Comparison between wet and dry preparations

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 61, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 483-494

  Kim, S H ^a   Choi, B I ^a   Han, J K ^a   Lee, J M ^a   Eun, H W ^b   Lee, J Y ^a   Lee, K H ^c   Han, C J ^a   Choi, Y H ^a   Shin, K S ^d  

^a Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

^c Seoul National University Bundang Hospital   (South Korea)

^d Chungnam National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MACROGOL; SODIUM CARBONATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY FLUID; COLON DILATATION; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FECES; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KOREA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ADENOMATOUS POLYPOSIS COLI; ADULT; AGED; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; CATHARTICS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; DIET; ENEMA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOLVENTS;

EID: 33646500804     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2006.01.012     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Pescatore P., Glucker T., Delarive J., et al. Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Gut 47 (2000) 126-130
2. McFarland E.G., Pilgram T.K., Brink J.A., et al. CT colonography: multiobserver diagnostic performance. Radiology 225 (2002) 380-390
3. Yee J., Akerkar G.A., Hung R.K., et al. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 219 (2001) 685-692
4. Pickhardt P.J., Choi J.R., Hwang I., et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349 (2003) 2191-2200
5. Edwards J.T., Mendelson R.M., Fritschi L., et al. Colorectal neoplasia screening with CT colonography in average-risk asymptomatic subjects: community-based study. Radiology 230 (2004) 459-464
6. Macari M., Bini E.J., Jacobs S.L., et al. Colorectal polyps and cancers in asymptomatic average-risk patients: evaluation with CT colonography. Radiology 230 (2004) 629-636
7. Scott R.G., Edwards J.T., Fritschi L., Foster N.M., Mendelson R.M., and Forbes G.M. Community-based screening by colonoscopy or computed tomographic colonography in asymptomatic average-risk subjects. Am J Gastroenterol 99 (2004) 1145-1151
8. Taylor S.A., Halligan S., Bartram C.I., et al. Multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of collimation, pitch, and orientation on polyp detection in a human colectomy specimen. Radiology 229 (2003) 109-118
9. Wessling J., Fischbach R., Meier N., et al. CT colonography: protocol optimization with multi-detector row CT-study in an anthropomorphic colon phantom. Radiology 228 (2003) 753-759
10. Van Gelder R.E., Venema H.W., Florie J., et al. CT colonography: feasibility of substantial dose reduction-comparison of medium to very low doses in identical patients. Radiology 232 (2004) 611-620
11. van Gelder R.E., Venema H.W., Serlie I.W., et al. CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. Radiology 224 (2002) 25-33
12. Macari M., Lavelle M., Pedrosa I., et al. Effect of different bowel preparations on residual fluid at CT colonography. Radiology 218 (2001) 274-277
13. Lefere P.A., Gryspeerdt S.S., Dewyspelaere J., et al. Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance. Radiology 224 (2002) 393-403
14. Callstrom M.R., Johnson C.D., Fletcher J.G., et al. CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility study. Radiology 219 (2001) 693-698
15. Hsu C.W., and Imperiale T.F. Meta-analysis and cost comparison of polyethylene glycol lavage versus sodium phosphate for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 48 (1998) 276-282
16. Thomson A., Naidoo P., and Crotty B. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized prospective trail comparing sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol in a predominantly elderly population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 11 (1996) 103-107
17. Church J.M. Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy-timing is the key!. Dis Colon Rectum 41 (1998) 1223-1225
18. Ginnerup P.B., Møller Christiansen T.E., Viborg M.F., et al. Bowel cleansing methods prior to CT colonography. Acta Radiol 43 (2002) 306-311
19. Kim H.S. Dietary fiber intake of Korean. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 26 (1997) 540-548
20. Kastenberg D., Chasen R., Choudhary C., et al. Efficacy and safety of sodium phosphate tablets compared with PEG solution in colon cleansing: two identically designed, randomized, controlled, parallel group, multicenter phase III trials. Gastrointest Endosc 54 (2001) 705-713
21. Vanner S.J., MacDonald P.H., Paterson W.G., et al. A randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (Golytely) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 85 (1990) 422-427
22. Cohen S.M., Wexner S.D., Binderow S.R., et al. Prospective, randomized, endoscopic blinded trial comparing precolonoscopy bowel cleansing methods. Dis Colon Rectum 37 (1994) 689-696
23. Poon C.M., Lee D.W., Mak S.K., et al. Two liters of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution versus sodium phosphate as bowel cleansing regimen for colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 34 (2002) 560-563