Electrocardiogram-Synchronized rotational speed change mode in rotary pumps could improve pulsatility

Artificial Organs

Volumn 35, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 941-947

  Ando, Masahiko ^a,b   Nishimura, Takashi ^b   Takewa, Yoshiaki ^a   Yamazaki, Kenji ^c   Kyo, Shunei ^b   Ono, Minoru ^b   Tsukiya, Tomonori ^a   Mizuno, Toshihide ^a   Taenaka, Yoshiyuki ^a   Tatsumi, Eisuke ^a  

^a NATIONAL CEREBRAL AND CARDIOVASCULAR CENTER   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^c TOKYO WOMEN'S MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Pulsatility; Rotary pump; Ventricular assist device

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD VESSELS; CHEMICAL DETECTION; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FIBER OPTIC SENSORS; LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICES;

AORTIC PRESSURE; CONDITION; CONTINUOUS MODE; CONTINUOUS-FLOW; PULSATILES; PULSATILITY; PULSE PRESSURE; PUMP FLOW; ROTATIONAL SPEED; VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE;

ROTARY PUMPS;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; AORTA FLOW; AORTA PRESSURE; ARTICLE; ASCENDING AORTA; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL; GOAT; HEART CYCLE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE PRESSURE; HEART PACING; HEART RATE; HEART RIGHT VENTRICLE; IN VIVO STUDY; LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSATILE FLOW; PULSE PRESSURE; ROTATION; SYSTOLE;

CAPRA HIRCUS;

EID: 80053631930     PISSN: 0160564X     EISSN: 15251594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01205.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Slaughter MS, Rogers JG, Milano CA, etal. Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. N Engl J Med 2009;361:2241-51.
2. Feller ED, Sorensen EN, Haddad M, etal. Clinical outcomes are similar in pulsatile and nonpulsatile left ventricular assist device recipients. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:1082-8.
3. Radovancevic B, Vrtovec B, de Kort E, Radovancevic R, Gregoric ID, Frazier OH. End-organ function in patients on long-term circulatory support with continuous- or pulsatile-flow assist devices. J Heart Lung Transplant 2007;26:815-8.
4. Garcia S, Kandar F, Boyle A, etal. Effects of pulsatile- and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices on left ventricular unloading. J Heart Lung Transplant 2008;27:261-7.
5. Garatti A, Bruschi G, Colombo T, etal. Clinical outcome and bridge to transplant rate of left ventricular assist device recipient patients: comparison between continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow devices. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;34:275-80. Discussion 280.
6. Sandner SE, Zimpfer D, Zrunek P, etal. Renal function after implantation of continuous versus pulsatile flow left ventricular assist devices. J Heart Lung Transplant 2008;27:469-73.
7. Kamdar F, Boyle A, Liao K, Colvin-Adams M, Joyce L, John R. Effects of centrifugal, axial, and pulsatile left ventricular assist device support on end-organ function in heart failure patients. J Heart Lung Transplant 2009;28:352-9.
8. Undar A. Myths and truths of pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion during acute and chronic cardiac support. Artif Organs 2004;28:439-43.
9. Drews T, Jurmann M, Michael D, Miralem P, Weng Y, Hetzer R. Differences in pulsatile and non-pulsatile mechanical circulatory support in long-term use. J Heart Lung Transplant 2008;27:1096-101.
10. Klotz S, Deng MC, Stypmann J, etal. Left ventricular pressure and volume unloading during pulsatile versus nonpulsatile left ventricular assist device support. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:143-9. Discussion 149-150.
11. Haft J, Armstrong W, Dyke DB, etal. Hemodynamic and exercise performance with pulsatile and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. Circulation 2007;116:I8-15.
12. Bartoli CR, Giridharan GA, Litwak KN, etal. Hemodynamic responses to continuous versus pulsatile mechanical unloading of the failing left ventricle. ASAIO J 2010;56:410-6.
13. Letsou GV, Pate TD, Gohean JR, etal. Improved left ventricular unloading and circulatory support with synchronized pulsatile left ventricular assistance compared with continuous-flow left ventricular assistance in an acute porcine left ventricular failure model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;140:1181-8.
14. Crow S, John R, Boyle A, etal. Gastrointestinal bleeding rates in recipients of nonpulsatile and pulsatile left ventricular assist devices. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:208-15.
15. Crow S, Milano C, Joyce L, etal. Comparative analysis of von Willebrand factor profiles in pulsatile and continuous left ventricular assist device recipients. ASAIO J 2010;56:441-5.
16. Nose Y, Yoshikawa M, Murabayashi S, Takano T. Development of rotary blood pump technology: past, present, and future. Artif Organs 2000;24:412-20.
17. Yamazaki K, Kihara S, Akimoto T, etal. Evaheart: an implantable centrifugal blood pump for long-term circulatory support. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;50:461-5.
18. Bourque K, Dague C, Farrar D, etal. In vivo assessment of a rotary left ventricular assist device-induced artificial pulse in the proximal and distal aorta. Artif Organs 2006;30:638-42.
19. Nishimura T, Tatsumi E, Nishinaka T, etal. Diminished vasoconstrictive function caused by long-term nonpulsatile left heart bypass. Artif Organs 1999;23:722-6.
20. Nishimura T, Tatsumi E, Nishinaka T, Taenaka Y, Nakata M, Takano H. Prolonged nonpulsatile left heart bypass diminishes vascular contractility. Int J Artif Organs 1999;22:492-8.
21. Nishimura T, Tatsumi E, Taenaka Y, etal. Effects of long-term nonpulsatile left heart bypass on the mechanical properties of the aortic wall. ASAIO J 1999;45:455-9.
22. Nishimura T, Tatsumi E, Takaichi S, etal. Prolonged nonpulsatile left heart bypass with reduced systemic pulse pressure causes morphological changes in the aortic wall. Artif Organs 1998;22:405-10.
23. Myers TJ, Bolmers M, Gregoric ID, Kar B, Frazier OH. Assessment of arterial blood pressure during support with an axial flow left ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant 2009;28:423-7.
24. Ootaki C, Yamashita M, Ootaki Y, etal. Reduced pulsatility induces periarteritis in kidney: role of the local renin-angiotensin system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;136:150-8.
25. Undar A, Masai T, Frazier OH, Fraser CD Jr. Pulsatile and nonpulsatile flows can be quantified in terms of energy equivalent pressure during cardiopulmonary bypass for direct comparisons. ASAIO J 1999;45:610-4.
26. Undar A, Frazier OH, Fraser CD Jr. Defining pulsatile perfusion: quantification in terms of energy equivalent pressure. Artif Organs 1999;23:712-6.
27. Undar A, Zapanta CM, Reibson JD, etal. Precise quantification of pressure flow waveforms of a pulsatile ventricular assist device. ASAIO J 2005;51:56-9.
28. Pantalos GM, Giridharan G, Colyer J, etal. Effect of continuous and pulsatile flow left ventricular assist on pulsatility in a pediatric animal model of left ventricular dysfunction: pilot observations. ASAIO J 2007;53:385-91.
29. Wright G. Hemodynamic analysis could resolve the pulsatile blood flow controversy. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;58:1199-204.
30. Undar A, Eichstaedt HC, Masai T, etal. Comparison of six pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass pumps during pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:827-9.