Pulsatile and nonpulsatile flows can be quantified in terms of energy equivalent pressure during cardiopulmonary bypass for direct comparisons

ASAIO Journal

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 610-614

  Ündar, Akif ^a,b,c   Masai, Takafumi ^b   Frazier, O H ^b   Fraser Jr , Charles D ^a,c  

^a TEXAS CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY; PULSATILE FLOW; PUMPS;

CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; NONPULSATILE FLOW;

HEMODYNAMICS;

ARTICLE; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCULATION; HEART ARREST; HEMODYNAMICS; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; NONHUMAN; ORGAN PERFUSION; PULSATILE FLOW; PULSE PRESSURE;

EID: 0033388669     PISSN: 10582916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00002480-199911000-00017     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Murkin JM, Martzke JS, Buchan AM, Bentley C, Wong CJ: A randomized study of the influence of perfusion technique and pH management strategy in 316 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. I. Mortality and cardiovascular morbidity. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 110: 340-348, 1995.
2. Minami K, Körner MM, Vyska K, Kleesiek K, Knobl H, Körfer R: Effects of pulsatile perfusion on plasma catecholamine levels and hemodynamics during and after cardiac operations with cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 99: 82-91, 1990.
3. Taylor KM: Pulsatile and non-pulsatile perfusion in cardiac surgery: the continuing controversy, in Lewis T, Graham TR (eds), Mechanical Circulatory Support. London: Edward Arnold, 1995, pp. 105-117.
4. Yasui H, Yonenaga K, Kado H, et al: Open-heart surgery in infants using pulsatile high-flow cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiovasc Surg 30: 661-668, 1989.
5. Fumero R, Montevecchi FM, Scuri S, Carrara B, Gamba A, Parenzan L: Clinical experience with a new pulsatile pump for infant and pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass. Int J Artif Organs 12: 314-320, 1989.
6. Williams CD, Seifen AB, Lawson NW, et al: Pulsatile perfusion versus conventional high-flow nonpulsatile perfusion for rapid core cooling and rewarming of infants for circulatory arrest in cardiac operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 78: 667-677, 1979.
7. Ündar A: Design and performance of physiologic pulsatile flow cardiopulmonary bypass systems for neonates and infants. Austin, TX: The University of Texas;1996. Dissertation.
8. Lodge AJ, Ündar A, Daggett CW, Runge TM, Calhoon JH, Ungerleider RM: Regional blood flow during pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass and after circulatory arrest in an infant model. Ann Thorac Surg 63: 1243-1250, 1997.
9. Anstadt MP, Tedder M, Hegde SS, et al: Pulsatile versus nonpulsatile reperfusion improves cerebral blood flow after cardiac arrest. Ann Thorac Surg 56: 453-461, 1993.
10. Johnson EH, Bennett SH, Goetzman BW: The influence of pulsatile perfusion on the vascular properties of the newborn lamb lung. Pediat Res 31: 349-353, 1992.
11. Fukae K, Tominaga R, Tokunaga S, Kawachi Y, Imaizumi T, Yasui H: The effects of pulsatile and nonpulsatile systemic perfusion on renal sympathetic nerve activity in anesthetized dogs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 111: 478-484, 1996.
12. Watanabe T, Washio M: Pulsatile low-flow perfusion for enhanced cerebral protection. Ann Thorac Surg 56: 1478-1481, 1993.
13. Champsaur G, Parisot P, Martinot S, et al: Pulsatility improves hemodynamics during fetal bypass. Circulation 90: II-47-II-50, 1994.
14. Ündar A, Masai T, Yang SQ, Goddard-Finegold J, Frazier OH, Fraser CD: Effects of perfusion mode on regional and global organ blood flow in a neonatal piglet model. Ann Thorac Surg 1999 (in press).