Spatial frequency-specific effects on the attentional bias: Evidence for two attentional systems

Cortex

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 547-556

  Singh, Vaughan V W ^a   Stojanoski, Boge ^a   Le, Ada ^a   Niemeier, Matthias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attention; Dorsal attentional network; Spatial neglect; Ventral attentional network

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CUES; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NERVE NET; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80053603997     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 00109452     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Betts L.R., Sekuler A.B., Bennett P.J. Spatial characteristics of center-surround antagonism in younger and older adults. Journal of Vision 2009, 9(1). 25, 1--15.
2. Binder J., Marshall R., Lazar R., Benjamin J., Mohr J.P. Distinct syndromes of hemineglect. Archives of Neurology 1992, 49(11):1187-1194.
3. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 1997, 10(4):433-436.
4. Bultitude J.H., Aimola Davies A.M. Putting attention on the line: Investigating the activation-orientation hypothesis of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44(10):1849-1858.
5. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002, 3(3):201-215.
6. Damasio A.R., Damasio H., Chui H.C. Neglect following damage to frontal lobe or basal ganglia. Neuropsychologia 1980, 18(2):123-132.
7. Doricchi F., Thiebaut de Schotten M., Tomaiuolo F., Bartolomeo P. White matter (dis)connections and gray matter (dys)functions in visual neglect: Gaining insights into the brain networks of spatial awareness. Cortex 2008, 44(8):983-995.
8. Ferber S., Karnath H.O. How to assess spatial neglect-line bisection or cancellation tasks?. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2001, 23(5):599-607.
9. Fink G.R., Marshall J.C., Weiss P.H., Zilles K. The neural basis of vertical and horizontal line bisection judgments: An fMRI study of normal volunteers. NeuroImage 2001, 14(1 Pt 2):S59-S67.
10. Fink G.R., Marshall J.C., Weiss P.H., Toni I., Zilles K. Task instructions influence the cognitive strategies involved in line bisection judgements: Evidence from modulated neural mechanisms revealed by fMRI. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40(2):119-130.
11. Foxe J.J., McCourt M.E., Javitt D.C. Right hemisphere control of visuospatial attention: Line-bisection judgments evaluated with high-density electrical mapping and source analysis. NeuroImage 2003, 19(3):710-726.
12. Gobell J., Carrasco M. Attention alters the appearance of spatial frequency and gap size. Psychological Science 2005, 16(8):644-651.
13. Halligan P.W., Marshall J.C. How long is a piece of string? A study of line bisection in a case of visual neglect. Cortex 1988, 24(2):321-328.
14. Halligan P.W., Marshall J.C. Left visuo-spatial neglect: A meaningless entity?. Cortex 1992, 28(4):525-535.
15. Harvey M., Milner A.D., Roberts R.C. An investigation of hemispatial neglect using the landmark task. Brain and Cognition 1995, 27(1):59-78.
16. Harvey M., Pool T.D., Roberson M.J., Olk B. Effects of visible and invisible cueing procedures on perceptual judgments in young and elderly subjects. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38(1):22-31.
17. Heilman K.M., Valenstein E. Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Annals of Neurology 1979, 5(2):166-170.
18. Husain M., Kennard C. Visual neglect associated with frontal lobe infarction. Journal of Neurology 1996, 243(9):652-657.
19. Ishiai S., Seki K., Koyama Y., Okiyama R. Effects of cueing on visuospatial processing in unilateral spatial neglect. Journal of Neurology 1995, 242(6):367-373.
20. Jewell G., McCourt M.E. Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38(1):93-110.
21. Karnath H.O., Ferber S., Himmelbach M. Spatial awareness is a function of the temporal not the posterior parietal lobe. Nature 2001, 411(6840):950-963.
22. Karnath H.O., Himmelbach M., Rorden C. The subcortical anatomy of human spatial neglect: Putamen, caudate nucleus and pulvinar. Brain 2002, 125(2):350-360.
23. Karnath H.O., Niemeier M. Task-dependent differences in the exploratory behaviour of patients with spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40(9):1577-1585.
24. Leibovitch F.S., Black S.E., Caldwell C.B., Ebert P.L., Ehrlich L.E., Szalai J.P. Brain-behavior correlations in hemispatial neglect using CT and SPECT: The Sunnybrook stroke study. Neurology 1998, 50(4):901-908.
25. Luh K.E. Line bisection and perceptual asymmetries in normal individuals: What you see is not what you get. Neuropsychology 1995, 9(4):435-448.
26. Mattingley J.B., Bradshaw J.L., Nettleton N.C., Bradshaw J.A. Can task specific perceptual bias be distinguished from unilateral neglect?. Neuropsychologia 1994, 32(7):805-817.
27. Mattingley J.B., Berberovic N., Corben L., Slavin M.J., Nicholls M.E., Bradshaw J.L. The greyscales task: A perceptual measure of attentional bias following unilateral hemispheric damage. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42(3):387-394.
28. McCourt M.E., Garlinghouse M., Reuter-Lorenz P.A. Unilateral visual cueing and asymmetric line geometry share a common attentional origin in the modulation of pseudoneglect. Cortex 2005, 41(4):499-511.
29. McCourt M.E., Jewell G. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: Stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37(7):843-855.
30. McGlinchey-Berroth R., Bullis D.P., Milberg W.P., Verfaellie M., Alexander M., D'Esposito M. Assessment of neglect reveals dissociable behavioural but not neuroanatomical subtypes. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 1996, 2(5):441-451.
31. Mennemeier M., Vezey E., Chatterjee A., Rapcsak S.Z., Heilman K.M. Contributions of the left and right cerebral hemispheres to line bisection. Neuropsychologia 1997, 35(5):703-715.
32. Mennemeier M., Pierce C.A., Chatterjee A., Anderson B., Jewell G., Dowler R., et al. Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: Neglect is a disorder of both. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005, 17(8):1194-1221.
33. Milner A.D., Harvey M. Distortion of size perception in visuospatial neglect. Current Biology 1995, 5(1):85-89.
34. Monaghan P., Shillcock R. Hemispheric asymmetries in cognitive modeling: Connectionist modeling of unilateral visual neglect. Psychological Review 2004, 111(2):283-308.
35. Mort D.J., Malhotra P., Mannan S.K., Rorden C., Pambakian A., Kennard C., et al. The anatomy of visual neglect. Brain 2003, 126(Pt 9):1986-1997.
36. Nichelli P., Rinaldi M., Cubelli R. Selective spatial attention and length representation in normal subjects and in patients with unilateral spatial neglect. Brain and Cognition 1989, 9(1):57-70.
37. Nicholls M.E.R., Bradshaw J.L., Mattingley J.B. Free viewing perceptual asymmetries for the judgement of brightness, numerosity and size. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37(3):307-314.
38. Nicholls M.E.R., Roberts G.R. Can free-viewing perceptual asymmetries be explained by scanning, pre-motor or attentional biases?. Cortex 2002, 38(2):113-136.
39. Niemeier M., Karnath H.O. Stimulus-driven and voluntary saccades are coded in different coordinate systems. Current Biology 2003, 13(7):585-589.
40. Niemeier M., Karnath H.O. Simulating and testing visual exploration in spatial neglect based on a new model for cortical coordinate transformation. Experimental Brain Research 2002, 145(4):512-519.
41. Niemeier M., Stojanoski B., Greco A.L. Influences of time and spatial frequency on the perceptual bias: evidence for competition between hemispheres. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45(5):1029-1040.
42. Niemeier M., Stojanoski B., Singh V.W.A., Chu E. Paradoxical cross-over due to attention to high or low spatial frequencies. Brain and Cognition 2008, 67(1):115-124.
43. Niemeier M., Singh V.W.A., Keough M., Akbar N. The perceptual consequences of the attentional bias: Evidence for distractor removal. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 189(4):411-420.
44. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9(1):97-113.
45. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics. Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 1997, 10(4):437-442.
46. Reuter-Lorenz P.A., Posner M.I. Components of neglect from right-hemisphere damage: An analysis of line bisection. Neuropsychologia 1990, 28(4):327-333.
47. Reuter-Lorenz P.A., Kinsbourne M., Moscovitch M. Hemispheric control of spatial attention. Brain and Cognition 1990, 12(2):240-266.
48. Riddoch M.J., Humphreys G.W. The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia 1983, 21(6):589-599.
49. Rovamo J., Virsu V., Nasanen R. Cortical magnification factor predicts the photopic contrast sensitivity of peripheral vision. Nature 1978, 271(5640):54-56.
50. Rorden C., Berger M.F., Karnath H.O. Disturbed line bisection is associated with posterior brain lesions. Brain Research 2006, 1080(1):17-25.
51. Rueckert L., Deravanesian A., Baboorian D., Lacalamita A., Repplinger M. Pseudoneglect and the cross-over effect. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40(2):162-173.
52. Schenkenberg T., Bradford D.C., Ajax E.T. Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment. Neurology 1980, 30(5):509-517.
53. Sergent J. The cerebral balance of power: Confrontation or cooperation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1982, 8(2):253-272.
54. Vallar G., Perani D. The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions. A clinical/CT-scan correlation study in man. Neuropsychologia 1986, 24(5):609-622.