Paradoxical cross-over due to attention to high or low spatial frequencies

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 115-125

  Niemeier, Matthias ^a,b   Stojanoski, Boge ^a   Singh, Vaughan W A ^a   Chu, Eddie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attention; Cueing; Human; Lateralization; Pseudoneglect; Right hemisphere dominance; Spatial frequency; Spatial neglect

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 43649099543     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Anderson B. A mathematical model of line bisection behaviour in neglect. Brain 119 (1996) 841-850
2. Bedson E., and Turnbull O.H. Hemispheric asymmetry for global and local processing: Language is less important than one might think. Brain and Cognition 48 (2002) 272-277
3. Binder J., Marshall R., Lazar R., Benjamin J., and Mohr J.P. Distinct syndromes of hemineglect. Archives of Neurology 49 (1992) 1187-1194
4. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 10 (1997) 433-436
5. Bultitude J.H., and Aimola Davies A.M. Putting attention on the line: Investigating the activation-orientation hypothesis of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia 44 (2006) 1849-1858
6. Carrasco M., Ling S., and Read S. Attention alters appearance. Nature Neuroscience 7 (2004) 308-313
7. Chatterjee A. Cross-over, completion and confabulation in unilateral spatial neglect. Brain 118 (1995) 455-465
8. Christman S. Cerebral Asymmetries in Sensory and Perceptual Processing (1997), North-Holland, Amsterdam
9. Christman S., Kitterle F.L., and Hellige J. Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of absolute versus relative spatial frequency. Brain and Cognition 16 (1991) 62-73
10. Corbetta M., Kincade J.M., Ollinger J.M., McAvoy M.P., and Shulman G.L. Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience 3 (2000) 292-297
11. Coull J.T., Nobre A.C., and Frith C.D. The noradrenergic alpha2 agonist clonidine modulates behavioural and neuroanatomical correlates of human attentional orienting and alerting. Cerebral Cortex 11 (2001) 73-84
12. Duncan J., Ward R., and Shapiro K. Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision. Nature 369 (1994) 313-315
13. Ferber S., and Karnath H.-O. How to assess spatial neglect-line bisection or cancellation tasks?. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 23 (2001) 599-607
14. Fink G.R., Marshall J.C., Weiss P.H., Toni I., and Zilles K. Task instructions influence the cognitive strategies involved in line bisection judgements: Evidence from modulated neural mechanisms revealed by fMRI. Neuropsychologia 40 (2002) 119-130
15. Fink G.R., Marshall J.C., Weiss P.H., and Zilles K. The neural basis of vertical and horizontal line bisection judgments: An fMRI study of normal volunteers. Neuroimage 14 (2001) S59-S67
16. Foxe J.J., McCourt M.E., and Javitt D.C. Right hemisphere control of visuospatial attention: Line-bisection judgments evaluated with high-density electrical mapping and source analysis. Neuroimage 19 (2003) 710-726
17. Frassinetti F., Nichelli P., and di Pellegrino G. Selective horizontal dysmetropsia following prestriate lesion. Brain 122 (1999) 339-350
18. Gobell J., and Carrasco M. Attention alters the appearance of spatial frequency and gap size. Psychological Science 16 (2005) 644-651
19. Grabowska A., and Nowicka A. Visual-spatial-frequency model of cerebral asymmetry: A critical survey of behavioral and electrophysiological studies. Psychological Bulletin 120 (1996) 434-449
20. Halligan P.W., and Marshall J.C. How long is a piece of string? A study of line bisection in a case of visual neglect. Cortex 24 (1988) 321-328
21. Harvey M., Milner A.D., and Roberts R.C. An investigation of hemispatial neglect using the landmark task. Brain and Cognition 27 (1995) 59-78
22. Harvey M., Pool T.D., Roberson M.J., and Olk B. Effects of visible and invisible cueing procedures on perceptual judgments in young and elderly subjects. Neuropsychologia 38 (2000) 22-31
23. Heilman K.M., and Valenstein E. Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Annals of Neurology 5 (1979) 166-170
24. Heilman K.M., and Van Den Abell T. Right hemisphere dominance for attention: The mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect). Neurology 30 (1980) 327-330
25. Hillis A.E., Newhart M., Heidler J., Barker P.B., Herskovits E.H., and Degaonkar M. Anatomy of spatial attention: Insights from perfusion imaging and hemispatial neglect in acute stroke. Journal of Neuroscience 25 (2005) 3161-3167
26. Hübner R. The effect of spatial frequency on global precedence and hemispheric differences. Perception and Psychophysics 59 (1997) 187-201
27. Ishiai S., Seki K., Koyama Y., and Okiyama R. Effects of cueing on visuospatial processing in unilateral spatial neglect. Journal of Neurology 242 (1995) 367-373
28. Ivry R.B., and Robertson L.C. The Two Sides of Perception (1998), MIT Press, Cambridge MA
29. Jewell G., and McCourt M.E. Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia 38 (2000) 93-110
30. Karnath H.-O., Ferber S., and Himmelbach M. Spatial awareness is a function of the temporal not the posterior parietal lobe. Nature 411 (2001) 950-953
31. Karnath H.-O., Himmelbach M., and Rorden C. The subcortical anatomy of human spatial neglect: Putamen, caudate nucleus and pulvinar. Brain 125 (2002) 350-360
32. Karnath H.-O., and Niemeier M. Task-dependent differences in the exploratory behaviour of patients with spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 40 (2002) 1577-1585
33. Kinsbourne M. A model for the mechanism of unilateral neglect of space. Transactions of the American Neurological Association 95 (1970) 143-146
34. Leibovitch F.S., Black S.E., Caldwell C.B., Ebert P.L., Ehrlich L.E., and Szalai J.P. Brain-behavior correlations in hemispatial neglect using CT and SPECT: The sunnybrook stroke study. Neurology 50 (1998) 901-908
35. Lindell A.K., Nicholls M.E.R., and Castles A.E. The effect of word length on hemispheric word recognition: Evidence from unilateral and bilateral-redundant presentations. Brain and Cognition 48 (2002) 447-452
36. Ling S., and Carrasco M. Sustained and transient covert attention enhance the signal via different contrast response functions. Vision Research 46 (2006) 1210-1220
37. Luh K.E. Line bisection and perceptual asymmetries in normal individuals: What you see is not what you get. Neuropsychology 9 (1995) 435-448
38. Mattingley J.B., Berberovic N., Corben L., Slavin M.J., Nicholls M.E., and Bradshaw J.L. The greyscales task: A perceptual measure of attentional bias following unilateral hemispheric damage. Neuropsychologia 42 (2004) 387-394
39. Mattingley J.B., Bradshaw J.L., Nettleton N.C., and Bradshaw J.A. Can task specific perceptual bias be distinguished from unilateral neglect?. Neuropsychologia 32 (1994) 805-817
40. McCourt M.E., Garlinghouse M., and Reuter-Lorenz P.A. Unilateral visual cueing and asymmetric line geometry share a common attentional origin in the modulation of pseudoneglect. Cortex 41 (2005) 499-511
41. McCourt M.E., and Jewell G. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: Stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia 37 (1999) 843-855
42. Mennemeier M., Pierce C.A., Chatterjee A., Anderson B., Jewell G., Dowler R., et al. Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: Neglect is a disorder of both. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17 (2005) 1194-1221
43. Mennemeier M., Rapcsak S.Z., Dillon M., and Vezey E. A search for the optimal stimulus. Brain and Cognition 37 (1998) 439-459
44. Mennemeier M., Vezey E., Chatterjee A., Rapcsak S.Z., and Heilman K.M. Contributions of the left and right cerebral hemispheres to line bisection. Neuropsychologia 35 (1997) 703-715
45. Mesulam M.M. A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Annals of Neurology 10 (1981) 309-325
46. Milner A.D., and Harvey M. Distortion of size perception in visuospatial neglect. Current Biology 5 (1995) 85-89
47. Monaghan P., and Shillcock R. The cross-over effect in unilateral neglect. Modelling detailed data in the line-bisection task. Brain 121 (1998) 907-921
48. Monaghan P., and Shillcock R. Hemispheric asymmetries in cognitive modeling: Connectionist modeling of unilateral visual neglect. Psychological Review 111 (2004) 283-308
49. Mort D.J., Malhotra P., Mannan S.K., Rorden C., Pambakian A., Kennard C., and Husain M. The anatomy of visual neglect. Brain 126 (2003) 1986-1997
50. Mozer M.C., Halligan P.W., and Marshall J.C. The cross-over effect in unilateral neglect. Modelling detailed data in the line-bisection task. Brain 121 (1997) 907-921
51. Navon D. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology 9 (1977) 353-383
52. Nichelli P., Rinaldi M., and Cubelli R. Selective spatial attention and length representation in normal subjects and in patients with unilateral spatial neglect. Brain and Cognition 9 (1989) 57-70
53. Nicholls M.E.R. The non-contribution of attentional biases to visual field asymmetries for temporal discrimination. Neuropsychologia 32 (1994) 209-220
54. Nicholls M.E.R., Bradshaw J.L., and Mattingley J.B. Free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for the judgement of brightness, numerosity and size. Neuropsychologia 37 (1999) 307-314
55. Nicholls M.E.R., and Roberts G.R. Can free-viewing perceptual asymmetries be explained by scanning, pre-motor or attentional biases?. Cortex 38 (2002) 113-136
56. Niemeier M., and Karnath H.-O. Simulating and testing visual exploration in spatial neglect based on a new model for cortical coordinate transformation. Experimental Brain Research 145 (2002) 512-519
57. Niemeier M., and Karnath H.-O. The exploration of space and objects in neglect. In: Karnath H.-O., Milner A.D., and Vallar G. (Eds). The Cognitive and Neural Bases of Spatial Neglect (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford
58. Niemeier M., and Karnath H.-O. Stimulus-driven and voluntary saccades are coded in different coordinate systems. Current Biology 13 (2003) 585-589
59. Niemeier M., Stojanoski B., and Greco A.L. Influences of time and spatial frequency on the perceptual bias: Evidence for competition between hemispheres. Neuropsychologia 45 (2007) 1029-1040
60. Okubo M., and Nicholls M.E.R. A stimulus-dependent dissociation between the cerebral hemispheres under free-viewing conditions. Experimental Brain Research 172 (2006) 49-56
61. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9 (1971) 97-113
62. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics. Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 10 (1997) 437-442
63. Posner M.I., Walker J.A., Friedrich F.J., and Rafal R.D. Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. Journal of Neuroscience 4 (1984) 1863-1874
64. Reuter-Lorenz P.A., Kinsbourne M., and Moscovitch M. Hemispheric control of spatial attention. Brain and Cognition 12 (1990) 240-266
65. Reuter-Lorenz P.A., and Posner M.I. Components of neglect from right-hemisphere damage: An analysis of line bisection. Neuropsychologia 28 (1990) 327-333
66. Riddoch M.J., and Humphreys G.W. The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia 21 (1983) 589-599
67. Robertson L.C., and Lamb M.R. Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization. Cognitive Psychology 23 (1991) 299-330
68. Rorden C., Fruhmann Berger M., and Karnath H.-O. Disturbed line bisection is associated with posterior brain lesions. Brain Research 1080 (2006) 17-25
69. Schenkenberg T., Bradford D.C., and Ajax E.T. Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment. Neurology 30 (1980) 509-517
70. Sergent J. The cerebral balance of power: Confrontation or cooperation?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 8 (1982) 253-272
71. Tegner R., and Levander M. The influence of stimulus properties on visual neglect. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 54 (1991) 882-886
72. Vallar G., and Perani D. The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions. A clinical/CT-scan correlation study in man. Neuropsychologia 24 (1986) 609-622
73. Yeshurun Y., and Carrasco M. Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution. Nature 396 (1998) 72-75
74. Yovel G., Levy J., and Yovel I. Hemispheric asymmetries for global and local visual perception: Effects of stimulus and task factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 (2001) 1369-1385
75. Yovel G., Levy J., Grabovecky M., and Paller K.A. Neural correlates of the left-visual-field superiority in face perception appear at multiple stages of face processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15 (2003) 462-474