Optimization of bioethanol production from intermediates of sugar beet processing by response surface methodology

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 35, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 4290-4296

  Grahovac, Jovana A ^a   Dodić, Jelena M ^a   Dodić, Siniša N ^a   Popov, Stevan D ^a   Jokić, Aleksandar I ^a   Zavargo, Zoltan Z ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOVI SAD   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Bioethanol; Optimization; RSM; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Sugar beet

Indexed keywords

AGITATION RATES; ANAEROBIC CONDITIONS; BATCH CULTURE; BIO-ETHANOL PRODUCTION; ETHANOL PRODUCTION; ETHANOL YIELD; FERMENTATION EFFICIENCY; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; RSM; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE CELLS; SECOND DEGREE POLYNOMIALS; STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES; YEAST STRAIN;

BATCH CELL CULTURE; BIOETHANOL; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; SUGAR BEETS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; YEAST;

SUGARS;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BREWING INDUSTRY; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; SUGAR BEET; TEMPERATURE EFFECT; YEAST;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BETA VULGARIS SUBSP. VULGARIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 80053583995     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.07.016     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Balat M., Balat H. Recent trends in global production and utilization of bio-ethanol fuel. Appl Energ 2009, 86(11):2273-2282.
2. Hatano K.-I., Kikuchi S., Nakamura Y., Sakamoto H., Takigami M., Kojima Y. Novel strategy using an adsorbent-column chromatography for effective ethanol production from sugarcane or sugar beet molasses. Bioresour Technol 2009, 100(20):4697-4703.
3. Popov S., Ranković J., Dodić J., Dodić S., Jokić A. Bioethanol production from raw juice as intermediate of sugar beet processing: a response surface methodology approach. Food Technol Biotechnol 2010, 48(3):376-383.
4. Ranković J., Dodić J., Dodić S., Popov S. Bioethanol production from intermediate products of sugar beet processing with different types of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chem Ind Chem Eng Q 2009, 15(1):13-16.
5. Kunteova L. The potential role of bioethanol. Int Sugar J 1996, 98(1173):448-452.
6. Bai F.W., Anderson W.A., Moo-Young M. Ethanol fermentation technologies from sugar and starch feedstocks. Biotechnol Adv 2008, 26(1):89-105.
7. Thomas K.C., Ingledew W.M. Production of 21% (v/v) ethanol by fermentation of very high gravity (VHG) wheat mashes. J Ind Microbiol 1992, 10:61-68.
8. Standard methods for examination of water and waste water 1998, APHA, AWWA, WEF, Washington D.C. 22nd ed.
9. Herlich K. Official methods of analysis of the association of official analytical 1990, AOAC, Arlington, VA.
10. Bellissimi E., Ingledew W.M. Metabolic acclimatization: preparing active dry yeast for fuel ethanol production. Process Biochem 2005, 40(6):2205-2213.
11. Roehr M. The biotechnology of ethanol, classical and future applications 2001, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Singapore, Toronto.
12. Ingledew W.M. Alcohol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a yeast primer, in the alcohol textbook 1999, Nottingham University Press, UK. 3rd ed.
13. Narendranath N.V., Thomas K.C., Ingledew W.M. Acetic acid and lactic acid inhibition of growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by different mechanisms. J Am Soc Brew Chem 2001, 59(4):187-194.
14. Jokić A., Zavargo Z., Šereš Z., Tekić M. The effect of turbulence promoter on cross-flow microfiltration of yeast suspensions: A response surface methodology approach. J Membr Sci 2010, 350(1-2):269-278.
15. Morgan E. Chemometrics: experimental design 1991, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
16. Henke S., Bubník Z., Hinková A., Pour V. Model of a sugar factory with bioethanol production in program Sugars™. J Food Eng 2006, 77(3):416-420.
17. Hinkova A., Bubnik Z. Sugar beet as a raw material for bioethanol production. Czech J Food Sci 2001, 19(6):224-234.