Aquifers overexploitation in SE Spain: A proposal for the integrated analysis of water management

Water Resources Management

Volumn 23, Issue 13, 2009, Pages 2737-2760

  Molina, José Luis ^a   García Aróstegui, José Luis ^a   Benavente, José ^b   Varela, Consuelo ^c   de la Hera, Africa ^a   López Geta, Juan Antonio ^a  

^a INSTITUTO GEOLÓGICO Y MINERO DE ESPAÑA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^c Electrotechnical Section   (Spain)

Author keywords

Aquifer overexploitation; Bayesian networks; Groundwater resources; Hydrological models; Integrated water management; Sustainable groundwater management

Indexed keywords

HYDROGEOLOGICAL; HYDROLOGICAL MODELS; INTEGRATED ANALYSIS; INTEGRATED WATER MANAGEMENT; INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL ASPECTS; OVEREXPLOITATION; REAL SITUATION; SUSTAINABLE GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT; WATER EXTRACTION; WATER SYSTEM;

AQUIFERS; BAYESIAN NETWORKS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; DISTRIBUTED PARAMETER NETWORKS; HYDRAULIC MODELS; HYDROGEOLOGY; INFERENCE ENGINES; INTELLIGENT NETWORKS; MANAGEMENT; PROFITABILITY; SOLVENT EXTRACTION; SPEECH RECOGNITION; TERNARY SYSTEMS; WATER ANALYSIS; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER PIPING SYSTEMS; WATERWORKS;

GROUNDWATER RESOURCES;

AQUIFER; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EXPLOITATION; GROUNDWATER RESOURCE; HYDROGEOLOGY; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; RECHARGE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WATER MANAGEMENT;

EURASIA; EUROPE; MURCIA [SPAIN]; SOUTHERN EUROPE; SPAIN;

EID: 70349250519     PISSN: 09204741     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-009-9406-5     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ames DP (2002) Bayesian decision network for watershed management. Ph.D. dissertation, Utah State University, USA
2. Andreu J, Solera A, Paredes J, Sanchez S (2006) Decision support systems for integrated water resources planning and management. In: International workshop on hydro-economic modelling and tools for the implementation of the EU water framework directive, Valencia, 30-31 Jan
3. Borsuk ME, Reckhow KH (2000) Summary description of the Neuse estuary. Bayesian ecological response network (Neu-BERN). http://www2.ncsu.edu/ ncsu/CIL/WRRI/neuseltm.html. Accessed 26 Dec 2001
4. Bromley J (2005) Guidelines for the use of Bayesian networks as a participatory tool for water resource management. Based on the results of the MERIT project. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford
5. Buchanan BG, Shortlife EH (1984) Rule-based expert systems: The MYCIN experiments of the stanford heuristic programming project. Addison-Wesley, Reading
6. Cain J (2001) Planning improvements in natural resources management. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford
7. Carbognin L, Gatto P, Mozzi G et al (1984) Venice subsidence case history 9.3. In: Poland JF (ed) Guidebook to studies of land subsidence due to ground-water withdrawal. International Hydrological Programme, working group 8.4, Chelsea, pp 161-174. http://www.rcamnl.wr.usgs.gov/ rgws/Unesco/PDF-Chapters/Chapter9-3.pdf
8. CHJ (Júcar Water Agency) (1997) Plan hidrológico de la cuenca del Júcar. Confederación Hidrográfica del Júcar, Valencia
9. CHS (Segura Water Agency) (1997) Plan hidrológico de la cuenca del Segura. Confederación Hidrográfica del Segura, Murcia
10. Custodio E (2002) Aquifer overexploitation: What does it mean? Hydrogeol J 10:254-277. doi: 10.1007/s10040-002-0188-6
11. Domínguez A (2004) Gestión integrada de los recursos hídricos de la unidad hidrogeológica mancha oriental mediante la utilización de redes bayesianas. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Castilla La Mancha, Spain (in Spanish)
12. Downs TJ, Mazari Hiriart M, Domínguez-Mora R, Buffet IH (2000) Sustainability of least cost policies for meeting Mexico City's future water demand. Water Resour Res 36(8):2321-2329. doi: 10.1029/1999WR900234
13. Heinz I, Pulido-Velazquez M, Lund JR, Andreu J (2007) Hydro-economic modeling in river basin management. Water Resour Manage 21:1103-1125. doi: 10.1007/s11269-006-9101-8
14. Henriksen HJ, Rasmussen P, Bromley J et al (2007) Bayesian belief networks as a tool for participatory integrated assessment and adaptive groundwater management: The Upper Guadiana basin, Spain. Geol Surv Den Greenl Bull 13:69-72
15. Kuikka S, Varis O (1997) Uncertainties of climate change impacts in Finnish watersheds: A Bayesian network analysis of expert knowledge. Boreal Environ Res 2:109-128
16. Llamas MR, Martínez-Santos P, De la Hera A (2006) Dimensions of sustainability in regard to groundwater resources: An overview. In: IGME (ed) Abstracts and proceedings of the International Symposium on Groundwater Sustainability (ISGWAS). IGME, Alicante, pp 24-27
17. Loucks DP (1995) Developing and implementing decision support systems: A critique and a challenge. Water Resour Bull 31(4):571-582
18. Loukas A, Mylopoulos N, Vasiliades L (2007) A modeling system for the evaluation of water resources management strategies. Water Resour Manage 21:1673-1702. doi: 10.1007/s11269-006-9120-5
19. McDonald M, Harbaugh A (1988) MODFLOW A modular three-dimensional finite difference ground-water flow model. US Geological Survey, Washington, DC
20. Orr P, Colvin J, King D (2007) Involving stakeholders in integrated river basin planning in England and Wales. Water Resour Manage 21:331-349. doi: 10.1007/s11269-006-9056-9
21. Palmer RN (1999) Modelling water resources opportunities, challenges, and trade-offs: The use of shared vision modelling for negotiation and conflict resolution. In: ASCE (ed) Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on water resources planning and management. ASCE, Tempe
22. Prato T, Fulcher C (1998) Protecting soil and water resources through multiobjective decision making. In: El-Swaify SA, Yakowitz DS (eds) Proceedings of the first international conference on Multiple Objective Decision Support Systems (MODSS) for land, water and environmental management. Lewis, New York, pp 385-394
23. Refsgaard JC, Storm B (1995) MIKE SHE Computer models of watershed hydrology. DHY, Hørsholm
24. Samper J, Huguet LL, Ares J et al (1999) Visual Balan Tutorial V 2.0. Interactive code to making hydrological balances and recharge estimation. ENRESA, Madrid
25. Sapher G (1976) A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton
26. Stevens L (1984) Artificial intelligence. The search for the perfect machine. Hayden Book Company, New York
27. UNDP (1977) Report of the united nations water conference in Mar de Plata. United Nations, New York
28. UNDP (1992) Agenda 21 Chapter 18 protection of the quality and supply of freshwater resources; application of integrated approaches to the development, management and use of water resources. United Nation Conference on Environment and Development. UNDP, Rio de Janeiro
29. Varis O, Kuikka S (1996) An influence diagram approach to Baltic salmon management. In: Proceedings of the conference on decision analysis for public policy in Europe, Atlanta, 3-6 Nov
30. Vrba J, Hirata R, Girman J et al (2006) Groundwater resources sustainability indicators. In: IGME (ed) Abstracts and proceedings of international symposium on groundwater sustainability ISGWAS. IGME, Madrid, p 6
31. WMO (1992) Development issues for the 21st century. In: The Dublin statement and report of the international conference on water and the environment, Dublin, 26-31 Jan
32. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford
33. Zorrilla P, Carmona G, de la Hera A et al (2007) Application of Bayesian networks to the upper Guadina basin. In: Proceedings of the CAIWA conference, Bassel, 12-15 Nov