Getting stakeholder participation 'right': A discussion of participatory processes and possible pitfalls

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 3, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 305-310

  Glicken, Jessica ^a  

^a Galisteo Consulting Group Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological risk assessment; Public participation; Stakeholder inclusion

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011219503     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1462-9011(00)00105-2     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Babiuch W.M., Farhar B.C. Stakeholder Analysis Methodologies Resource Book. 1994;National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO. NREL/TP-461-5857.
2. Bear D. Public Participation in Environmental Decisionmaking. 1994;American Bar Association Standing Committee on Environmental Law, Washington, DC.
3. Beatty K.M. Public opinion data for environmental decision making: the case of Colorado Springs. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 11:1991;29-51.
4. de Tocqueville A. Democracy in America. 1945;Vintage Books, New York.
5. Engi D., Glicken J. The Vital Issues Process: Strategic Planning for a Changing World, World SAND95-0845 May 1995. 1995;Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM.
6. Finney C., Polk R.E. Developing stakeholder understanding, technical capability, and responsibility: the New Bedford Harbor Superfund Forum. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 15:1995;517-541.
7. Glicken J. Stakeholder Mapping and Environmental Risk Assessment: Developing Socially Appropriate Solutions to Environmental Problems Poster Session American Anthropological Association 95th Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA. 1996.
8. Glicken J. Effective public involvement in public decisions. Science Communication. 2:(3):1999;298-327.
9. Harper B., Harris S. Risk management, environmental justice, and tribal perspectives. Risk Management Quarterly. 5:1997;1.
10. Hayton R.D. The matter of public participation. Natural Resources Journal. 33:1998;275-281.
11. Kangas J. An approach to public participation in strategic forest management planning. Forest Ecology and Management. 70:1999;75-88.
12. Stern P.C., Fineberg H.V. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society Committee on Risk Characterization. 1996;National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
13. Perrucci R., Potter H.R. Perrucci R., Potter H.R. The Collective Actor in Organizational Analysis. Networks of Power Organizational Actors at the National, Corporate, and Community Levels. 1989;1-16 Adeline de Greyter BooksNew York.
14. Putnam, R., 2000. Bowling alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster, New York.
15. Renn O., Webler T., Johnson B.B. Public participation in hazard management: the use of citizen panels in the US. Risk - Issues in Health and Safety. 197:1991;197-226.
16. Renn O., Webler T., Rakel H., Dienel P., Johnson B. Public participation in decision making: a three-step procedure. Policy Sciences. 26:1992;189-214.
17. Sample V.A. A framework for public participation in natural resource decisionmaking. Journal of Forestry. 93:1993;22-27. July.
18. Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment EPA/630/R-95/002F April. 1998.
19. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2000. Community Cultural Profiling Guide: Understanding a community's sense of place.
20. Yosie, T.F., Herbst, T.D., 1999. Using Stakeholder Processes in Environmental Decisionmaking: An Evaluation of Lessons Learned, Key Issues, and Future Challenges. Unpublished manuscript from Ruder Finn, Washington.