Data-driven methods for modeling social perception

Social and Personality Psychology Compass

Volumn 5, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 775-791

  Todorov, Alexander ^a,b   Dotsch, Ron ^a,b   Wigboldus, Daniel H J ^b   Said, Chris P ^c  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053557896     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17519004     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00389.x     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Ahumada, A. J. (2002). Classification image weights and internal noise level estimation. Journal of Vision, 2, 121-131.
2. Ahumada, A. J., & Lovell, J. (1971). Stimulus features in signal detection. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 1751-1756.
3. Bahrick, H. P., Bahrick, P. O., & Wittlinger, R. P. (1975). Fifty years of memory for names and faces: A cross-sectional approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 54-75.
4. Bar, M., Neta, M., & Linz, H. (2006). Very first impressions. Emotion, 6, 269-278.
5. Blanz, V., & Vetter, T. (1999). A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques SIGGRAPH 99, 33, Annual Conference Series, ACM Press, pp. 187-194. ISSN: 00978930, ISBN: 0201485605. doi:.
6. Blanz, V., & Vetter, T. (2003). Face recognition based on fitting a 3D morphable model. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 25, 1063-1074.
7. Bluemke, M., & Friese, M. (2008). Reliability and validity of the Single-Target IAT (ST-IAT): Assessing automatic affect toward multiple political groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 977-997.
8. Bowyer, K. W., Chang, K., & Flynn, P. (2006). A survey of approaches and challenges in 3D and multi-modal 3D+2D face recognition. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 101, 1-15.
9. Brahnam, S. (2005). A computational model of the trait impressions of the face for agent perception and face synthesis. AISB Journal, 1(6), 481-508.
10. Calder, A. J., & Young, A. W. (2005). Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 641-651.
11. Cloutier, J., Mason, M. F., & Macrae, C. N. (2005). The perceptual determinants of person construal: Reopening the social-cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 885-894.
12. Dai, H., & Micheyl, C. (2010). Psychophysical reverse correlation with multiple response alternatives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(4), 976-993.
13. Dotsch, R., Wigboldus, D. H. J., & van Knippenberg, A. (2011). Biased allocation of faces to social categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 999-1014.
14. Dotsch, R., Wigboldus, D. H., Langner, O., & van Knippenberg, A. (2008). Ethnic out-group faces are biased in the prejudiced mind. Psychological Science, 19, 978-980.
15. Esteves, F., & Öhman, A. (1993). Masking the face: Recognition of emotional facial expressions as a function of the parameters of backward masking. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 34, 1-18.
16. Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, M., & Tanaka, J. N. (1998). What is "special" about face perception? Psychological Review, 105, 482-498.
17. Gordijn, E. H., Koomen, W., & Stapel, D. A. (2001). Level of prejudice in relation to knowledge of cultural stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 150-157.
18. Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. G. (2001). Bubbles: A technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks. Vision Research, 41, 2261-2271.
19. Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. G. (2003). Superstitious perceptions reveal properties of internal representations. Psychological Science, 15(5), 505-509.
20. Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. G. (2004). (Eds.) Special issue: Rendering the use of visual information from spiking neurons to recognition. Cognitive Science, 28 (2), 141-146.
21. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. K. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
22. Grill-Spector, K., & Kanwisher, N. (2005). Visual recognition: As soon as you know it is there, you know what it is. Psychological Science, 16, 152-160.
23. Imhoff, R., Dotsch, R., Bianchi, M., Banse, R., & Wigboldus, D. H. J. (forthcoming). Facing Europe: Visualizing spontaneous in group projection. Psychological Science.
24. Jack, R. E., Caldara, R., & Schyns, P. G. (2011). Internal representations reveal cultural diversity in expectations of facial expressions of emotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, doi: 10.1037/a0023463.
25. Kontsevich, L. L., & Tyler, C. W. (2004). What makes Mona Lisa smile? Vision Research, 44, 1493-1498.
26. Langner, O., Becker, E. S., & Rinck, M. (2009). Social anxiety and anger identification: Bubbles reveal differential use of facial information with low spatial frequencies. Psychological Science, 20(6), 666-670.
27. Mangini, M. C., & Biederman, I. (2004). Making the ineffable explicit: Estimating the information employed for face classification. Cognitive Science, 28, 209-226.
28. Martin, D., & Macrae, C. N. (2007). A boy primed Sue: Feature based processing and person construal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(5), 793-805.
29. Martin-Malivel, J., Mangini, M. C., Fagot, J., & Biederman, I. (2006). Do humans and baboons use the same information when categorizing human and baboon faces? Psychological Science, 17, 599-607.
30. Maurer, D., Le Grand, R., & Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 255-260.
31. Nestor, A., & Tarr, M. J. (2008). Gender recognition of human faces using color. Psychological Science, 19, 1242-1246.
32. Oosterhof, N. N., & Todorov, A. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105, 11087-11092.
33. O'Toole, A. J., Vetter, T., & Blanz, V. (1999). Three-dimensional shape and two-dimensional surface reflectance contributions to face recognition: An application of three-dimensional morphing. Vision Research, 39, 3145-3155.
34. O'Toole, A. J., Vetter, T., Troje, N. F., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1997). Sex classification is better with three-dimensional head structure than with image intensity information. Perception, 26, 75-84.
35. O'Toole, A. J., Wenger, M. J., & Townsend, J. T. (2001). Quantitative models of perceiving and remembering faces: Precedents and possibilities. In M. J. Wenger & J. T. Townsend (Eds.), Computational, Geometric, and Process Perspectives on Facial Cognition (pp. 1-38). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Ringach, D. L., & Shapley, R. (2004). Reverse correlation in neurophysiology. Cognitive Science, 28, 147-166.
37. Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2008). Brief exposures: Male sexual orientation is accurately perceived at 50ms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1100-1105.
38. Said, C., Sebe, N., & Todorov, A. (2009). Structural resemblance to emotional expressions predicts evaluation of emotionally neutral faces. Emotion, 9, 260-264.
39. Said, C. P., & Todorov, A. (forthcoming). A statistical model of facial attractiveness. Psychological Science.
40. Schyns, P. G., Gosselin, F., & Smith, M. L. (2009). Information processing algorithms in the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 20-26.
41. Sinha, P., Balas, B., Ostrovsky, Y., & Russell, R. (2006). Face recognition by humans: Nineteen results all computer vision researchers should know about. Proceedings of the IEEE, 94, 1948-1962.
42. Smith, M. L., Cottrell, G. W., Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. G. (2005). Transmitting and decoding facial expressions. Psychological Science, 16, 184-189.
43. Solomon, J. A. (2002). Noise reveals visual mechanisms of detection and discrimination. Journal of Vision, 2, 105-120.
44. Todorov, A., Loehr, V., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2010). The obligatory nature of holistic processing of faces in social judgments. Perception, 39, 514-532.
45. Todorov, A., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2011). Modeling social perception of faces. Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, 28, 117-122.
46. Todorov, A., Pakrashi, M., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2009). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness after minimal time exposure. Social Cognition, 27, 813-833.
47. Todorov, A., Said, C. P., Engell, A. D., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2008). Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 455-460.
48. Troje, N. F. (2002). Decomposing biological motion: A framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. Journal of Vision, 2, 371-387.
49. Turk, M., & Pentland, A. (1991). Eigenfaces for recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 71-86.
50. Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A(2), 161-204.
51. Victor, J. D. (2005). Analyzing receptive fields, classification images and functional images: Challenges with opportunities for synergy. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1651-1656.
52. Walker, M., & Vetter, T. (2009). Portraits made to measure: Manipulating social judgments about individuals with a statistical face model. Journal of Vision, 9(11), 12.
53. Yip, A. W., & Sinha, P. (2002). Contribution of color to face recognition. Perception, 31(8), 995-1003.
54. Zebrowitz, L. A., & Montepare, J. M. (2008). Social psychological face perception: Why appearance matters. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1497-1517.