Portraits made to measure: Manipulating social judgments about individuals with a statistical face model

Journal of Vision

Volumn 9, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1-13

  Walker, Mirella ^a   Vetter, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Face modeling; Face perception; Social judgments

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FACTUAL DATABASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERSONALITY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; STATISTICAL MODEL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; JUDGMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PERSONALITY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70449717142     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/9.11.1     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bachmann, T., & Nurmoja, M. (2006). Are there affordances of suggestibility in facial appearance? Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30, 87-92.
2. Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on multiplying factors for various chi-squared approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 16, 296-298.
3. Blanz, V. (2000). Automatische Rekonstruktion der drei- dimensionalen Form von Gesichtern aus einem Einzelbild. Universität Tübingen, Tübingen.
4. Blanz, V., Scherbaum, K., Vetter, T., & Seidel, H.-P. (2004). Exchanging faces in images. Computer Graphics Forum, 23, 669-676.
5. Blanz, V., & Vetter, T. (1999). A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (pp. 187-194). New York: ACM Press.
6. Bower, G. H., & Karlin, M. B. (1974). Depth of processing pictures of faces and recognition memory. 751-757.
7. Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305-327.
8. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.
9. Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.) (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York :The Guilford Press.
10. Cheng, Y. D., O'Toole, A. J., & Abdi, H. (2001). Classifying adults' and children's faces by sex: Computational investigations of subcategorical feature encoding. Cognitive Science, 25, 819-838.
11. Corneille, O., Huart, J., Becquart, E., & Brédart, S. (2004). When memory shifts toward more typical category exemplars: Accentuation effects in the recollection of ethnically ambiguous faces. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 236-250.
12. Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109-128.
13. Etcoff, N. L., & Magee, J. J. (1992). Categorical perception of facial expressions. Cognition, 44, 227-240.
14. Halberstadt, J. B., & Niedenthal, P. M. (2001). Effects of emotion concepts on perceptual memory for emotional expressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 587-598.
15. Hill, H., Bruce, V., & Akamatsu, S. (1995). Perceiving the sex and race of faces: The role of shape and colour. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 261, 367-373.
16. Hoffman, C., & Hurst, N. (1990). Gender stereotypes: Perception or rationalization? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 197-208.
17. Huart, J., Corneille, O., & Becquart, E. (2005). Face-based categorization, context-based categorization, and distortions in the recollection of gender ambiguous faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 598-608.
18. Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
19. Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401-415.
20. Kaiser, H. F., & Rice, J. (1974). Little jiffy, Mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 35, 111-117.
21. MacLin, O. H., & Malpass, R. S. (2001). Racial categorization of faces. The ambiguous race face effect. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 98-118.
22. Martin, D., & Macrae, C. N. (2007). A face with a cue: Exploring the inevitability of person categorization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 806-816.
23. Montepare, J. M., & Dobish, H. (2003). The contribution of emotion perceptions and their overgeneralizations to trait impressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 237-254.
24. Mueller, J. H., Heesacker, M., & Ross, M. J. (1984). Likability of targets and distractors in facial recognition. American Journal of Psychology, 97, 235-247.
25. O'Toole, A. J., Vetter, T., & Blanz, V. (1999). Three-dimensional shape and two-dimensional surface reectance contributions to face recognition: An application of three-dimensional morphing. Vision Research, 39, 3145-3155.
26. O'Toole, A. J., Vetter, T., Troje, N. F., & Bulthoff, H. H. (1997). Sex classification is better with three-dimensional head structure than with image intensity information. Perception, 26, 75-84.
27. Oosterhof, N. N., & Todorov, A. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 11087-11092.
28. Phillips, P. J., Wechsler, H., Huang, J., & Rauss, P. J. (1998). The FERET database and evaluation procedure for face-recognition algorithms. Image and Vision Computing, 16, 295-306.
29. Potter, T., & Corneille, O. (2008). Locating attractiveness in the face space: Faces are more attractive when closer to their group prototype. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 615-622.
30. Romdhani, S., & Vetter, T. (2005). Estimating 3D shape and texture using pixel intensity, edges, specular highlights, texture constraints and a prior. In 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (vol. 2, pp. 986-993).
31. Rossion, B. (2002). Is sex categorization from faces really parallel to face recognition? Visual Cognition, 9, 1003-1020.
32. Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2008). The face of success: Inferences from chief executive ofcers' appearance predict company prots. Psychological Science: A Journal of the American Psychological Society/APS, 19, 109-111.
33. Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A., & Hall, C. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308, 1623-1626.
34. Todorov, A., Said, C. P., Engell, A. D., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2008). Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 455-460.
35. Troje, N. F., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1998). How is bilateral symmetry of human faces used for recognition of novel views? Vision Research, 38, 79-89.
36. Wild, H. A., Barrett, S. E., Spence, M. J., O'Toole, A. J., Cheng, Y. D., & Brooke, J. (2000). Recognition and sex categorization of adults' and children's faces: Examining performance in the absence of sex-stereotyped cues. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 269-291.
37. Yip, A. W., & Sinha, P. (2002). Contribution of color to face recognition. Perception, 31, 995-1003.
38. Zebrowitz, L. A., Andreoletti, C., Collins, M. A., Lee, S. Y., & Blumenthal, J. (1998). Bright, bad, baby-faced boys: Appearance stereotypes do not always yield self-fullling prophecy effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1300-1320.
39. Zebrowitz,L.A.,Fellous,J.-M.,Mignault,A.,& Andreoletti, C. (2003). Trait impressions as over-generalized responses to adaptively signicant facial qualities: Evidence from connectionist modeling. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 194-215.
40. Zebrowitz, L. A., Hall, J. A., Murphy, N. A., & Rhodes, G. (2002). Looking smart and looking good: Facial cues to intelligence and their origins. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 238-249.
41. Zebrowitz, L. A., Voinescu, L., & Collins, M. A. (1996). "Wide-eyed" and "crooked-faced": Determinants of perceived and real honesty across the life span. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1258-1269.