Evaluation of the learning path specification

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 218-230

  Janssen, José ^a   Berlanga, Adriana J ^a   Koper, Rob ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Formal learning; Informal learning; Learner choice; Learning path specification

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053525260     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Beach, L. R. (1997). The Psychology of Decision Making: People in Organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Beck, B. (2002). Model evaluation and performance. In A. H. El-Shaarawi & W. W. Piegorsch (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Environmetrics (Vol. 3, pp. 1275-1279). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
3. CEC. (2000). A Memorandum on Lifelong Learning. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
4. Colardyn, D., & Bjornavold, J. (2004). Validation of Formal, Non-formal and Informal Learning: policy and practices in EU Member States. European Journal of Education, 39(1), 69-89.
5. Colley, H., Hodkinson, P., & Malcolm, J. (2003). Informality and formality in learning: a report for the Learning and Skills Research Centre. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre.
6. Coughlin, S. S. (1990). Recall Bias in Epidemiologic Studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43(1), 87-91.
7. Drachsler, H., Hummel, H., & Koper, R. (2008). Personal recommender systems for learners in lifelong learning: requirements, techniques and model. International Journal of Learning Technology, 3(4), 404-423.
8. Fasolo, B., McClelland, G. H., & Todd, P. M. (2007). Escaping the tyranny of choice: when fewer attributes make choice easier. Marketing Theory, 7(1), 13-26.
9. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-245.
10. Hager, P. (1998). Recognition of Informal Learning: challenges and issues. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 50(4), 521-534.
11. Janssen, J., Hermans, H., Berlanga, A.J., & Koper, R. (2008). Learning Path Information Model. Retrieved November 9, 2008, from http://hdl.handle.net/1820/1620.
12. Janssen, J., Berlanga, A. J., Vogten, H., & Koper, R. (2008). Towards a learning path specification. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, 18(1), 77-97.
13. Kickmeier-Rust, M. D., Albert, D., & Steiner, C. (2006). Lifelong Competence Development: On the Advantages of Formal Competence-Performance Modeling. Proceedings of the International Workshop in Learning Networks for Lifelong Competence Development, March 2007, Sofia, Bulgaria.
14. Krogstie, J. (1998). Integrating the Understanding of Quality in Requirements Specification and Conceptual Modeling. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 23(1), 86-91.
15. Leung, F., & Bolloju, N. (2005). Analyzing the Quality of Domain Models Developed by Novice Systems Analysts. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
16. Lidwell, W., Holden, K., & Butler, J. (2003). Universal Principles of Design. Gloucester, Massachusetts: Rockport.
17. Lindland, O. I., Sindre, G., & Solvberg, A. (1994). Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Software, 11, 42-49.
18. Livingstone, D. W. (1999). Exploring the Icebergs of Adult Learning: Findings of the First Canadian Survey of Informal Learning Practices. NALL Working Paper No. 10.
19. Malhotra, N. K. (1982). Information Load and Consumer Decision Making. The Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 419-430.
20. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
21. Moody, D. L. (2005). Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 55, 243-276.
22. Moody, D. L., Sindre, G., Brasethvik, T., & Sølvberg, A. (2002). Evaluating the Quality of Process Models: Empirical Analysis of a Quality Framework. Paper presented at the 21st International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, Tampere, Finland.
23. Nelson, H. J., Poels, G., Genero, M., & Piattini, M. (2005). Quality in conceptual modeling: five examples of the state of the art. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 55, 237-242.
24. Recker, J. (2005). Conceptual Model Evaluation. Towards more Paradigmatic Rigor. Paper presented at the EMMSAD 2005 - Exploring Modeling Methods for Systems Analysis and Design.
25. Recker, J. (2006). Towards an Understanding of Process Model Quality. Methodological Considerations. Paper presented at the 14th European Conference on Information Systems, Goeteborg, Sweden.
26. Rundle-Thiele, S., Shao, W., & Lye, A. (2005). Computer Process Tracing Method: Revealing Insights Into Consumer Decision-Making. Paper presented at the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference (ANZMAC).
27. Schugurensky, D. (2000). The forms of informal learning: towards a conceptualization of the field. NALL Working Paper No. 19.
28. Skule, S. (2004). Learning conditions at work: a framework to understand and assess informal learning in the workplace. International Journal of Training and Development, 8(1), 8-20.
29. Teeuw, W. B., & Berg, H. v. d. (1997). On the Quality of Conceptual Models. Paper presented at the ER'97 Workshop on Behavioral Models and Design Transformations: Issues and Opportunities in Conceptual Modeling, Los Angeles.
30. Turbek, S. (2008). Advancing Advanced Search. Boxes And Arrows: The Design Behind the Design. Retrieved February 7, 2008, from http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/advancing-advanced.
31. Van Lamsweerde, A. (2000). Formal Specification: a Roadmap. In A. Finkelstein (Ed.), The Future of Software Engineering: 22nd international conference on software engineering: ACM Press.
32. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research. Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.