The role of perception in imaging: Past and future

Seminars in Nuclear Medicine

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 392-400

  Krupinski, Elizabeth A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; PERCEPTION; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIODIAGNOSIS; SATISFACTION; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 80053524183     PISSN: 00012998     EISSN: 15584623     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2011.05.002     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. R.S. Weinstein, A.R. Graham, and L.C. Richter Overview of telepathology, virtual microscopy, and whole slide imaging: Prospects for the future Hum Pathol 40 2009 1057 1069
2. E. Krupinski, M. Nypaver, and R. Poropatich Telemedicine/telehealth: An international perspective Clinical applications in telemedicine/telehealth Telemed J E Health 8 2002 13 34 (Pubitemid 34496551)
3. C.A. Beam, E.A. Krupinski, and H.L. Kundel The place of medical image perception in 21st-century health care J Am Coll Radiol 3 2006 409 412 (Pubitemid 43775810)
4. M.L. Thakur Genomic biomarkers for molecular imaging: Predicting the future Semin Nucl Med 39 2009 236 246
5. H.H. Barrett, and K.J. Myers Foundations of Image Science 2003 John Wiley & Sons Hoboken, NJ
6. C.K. Abbey, and M.P. Eckstein Observer models as a surrogate to perception experiments E. Samei, E. Krupinski, The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques 2010 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, England 240 250
7. M. Kupinski Implementation of observer models E. Samei, E. Krupinski, The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques 2010 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, England 251 258
8. A. Burgess Signal detection theoryA brief history E. Samei, E. Krupinski, The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques 2010 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, England 26 46
9. J.S. Magnussen, P. Chicco, and A.W. Palmer Variability of perceived defect size in virtual lung scintigraphy J Nucl Med 39 1998 361 365 (Pubitemid 28114533)
10. J. Meyer-Spradow, L. Stegger, and C. Doring Glyph-based SPECT visualization forb the diagnosis of coronary artery disease IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 14 2008 1499 1506
11. D.J. Manning, A. Gale, and E.A. Krupinski Perception research in medical imaging Br J Radiol 78 2005 683 685 (Pubitemid 41122679)
12. C.A. Beam, E.F. Conant, and E.A. Sickles Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation J Natl Cancer Inst 95 2003 282 290 (Pubitemid 36336478)
13. C.A. Beam, E.F. Conant, and E.A. Sickles Evaluation of proscriptive health care policy implementation in screening mammography Radiology 229 2003 534 540 (Pubitemid 37310843)
14. L. Berlin Errors of omission AJR Am J Roentgenol 185 2005 1416 1421
15. L. Berlin Accuracy of diagnostic procedures: Has it improved over the past five decades? AJR Am J Roentgenol 188 2007 1173 1178 (Pubitemid 46668492)
16. L. Berlin Malpractice issues in radiology: Res ipsa loquitur AJR Am J Roentgenol 193 2009 1475
17. M.J. Sangwaiya, S. Saini, and M.A. Blake Errare humanum est: Frequency of laterality errors in radiology reports AJR Am J Roentgenol 192 2009 W239 W244
18. J.N. Harder, T.F. Hany, and G.K. von Schulthess Pathologies of the lower abdomen and pelvis: PET/CT reduces interpretation errors due to urinary contamination Clin Imaging 32 2008 16 21 (Pubitemid 350299120)
19. C.C. Birkelo, W.E. Chamberlain, and P.S. Phelps Tuberculosis case finding A comparison of the effectiveness of various roentgenographic and photofluorographic methods JAMA 133 1947 359 366
20. L.H. Garland On the scientific evaluation of diagnostic procedures Radiology 52 1949 309 328
21. R.R. Newell, W.E. Chamberlain, and L. Rigler Descriptive classification of pulmonary shadows; a revelation of unreliability in the roentgenographic diagnosis of tuberculosis Am Rev Tuberc 69 1954 566 584
22. W.J. Tuddenham, and W.P. Calvert Visual search patterns in roentgen diagnosis Radiology 76 1961 255 256
23. H.L. Kundel, C.F. Nodine, and D. Carmody Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision-making in pulmonary nodule detection Invest Radiol 13 1978 175 181 (Pubitemid 8368823)
24. H.L. Kundel, C.F. Nodine, and E.A. Krupinski Searching for lung nodules Visual dwell indicates locations of false-positive and false-negative decisions Invest Radiol 24 1989 472 478 (Pubitemid 19160372)
25. P.J. Lund, E.A. Krupinski, and S. Pereles Comparison of conventional and computed radiography: Assessment of image quality and reader performance in skeletal extremity trauma Acad Radiol 4 1997 570 576 (Pubitemid 127470977)
26. C.H. Hu, H.L. Kundel, and C.F. Nodine Searching for bone fractures: A comparison with pulmonary nodule search Acad Radiol 1 1994 25 32
27. E.A. Krupinski Visual scanning patterns of radiologists searching mammograms Acad Radiol 3 1996 137 144
28. C.F. Nodine, H.L. Kundel, and C. Mello-Thoms How experience and training influence mammography expertise Acad Radiol 6 1999 575 585 (Pubitemid 32674933)
29. E. Samei, M.J. Flynn, and K.J. Kearfott Patient dose and detectability of subtle lung nodules in digital chest radiographs Health Phys 72 1997 6S
30. C.F. Nodine, and H.L. Kundel Using eye movements to study visual search and to improve tumor detection Radiographics 7 1987 1241 1250
31. E.A. Krupinski, A.A. Tillack, and L. Richter Eye-movement study and human performance using telepathology virtual slides: Implications for medical education and differences with experience Hum Pathol 37 2006 1543 1556 (Pubitemid 44792232)
32. C. Mello-Thoms, C.A. Mello, and O. Medvedeva Characterizing virtual slide exploration through the use of "search maps." Proc SPIE Med Imaging 7966 2011 79660Q
33. E.A. Krupinski, C.F. Nodine, and H.L. Kundel Enhancing recognition of lesions in radiographic images using perceptual feedback Opt Eng 37 1998 813 818 (Pubitemid 128486140)
34. M.J. Smith Error and Variation in Diagnostic Radiology 1967 Charles C. Thomas Publisher Springfield, IL
35. W.J. Tuddenham Visual search, image organization, and reader error in roentgen diagnosis Studies of the psycho-physiology of roentgen image perception Radiology 78 1962 694 704
36. W.J. Tuddenham Problems of perception in chest roentgenology: Facts and fallacies Radiol Clin North Am 1 1963 227 289
37. K.S. Berbaum, E. Franken, and R. Caldwell Satisfaction of search in traditional radiographic imaging E. Samei, E. Krupinski, The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques 2010 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, England 107 138
38. C.S. White, R. Pugatch, and T. Koonce Lung nodule CAD software as a second reader: A multicenter study Acad Radiol 15 2008 326 333 (Pubitemid 351232248)
39. C. Sohns, B.C. Angic, and S. Sossalla CAD in full-field digital mammographyinfluence of reader experience and application of CAD on interpretation of time Clin Imaging 34 2010 418 424
40. C. Sohns, B. Angic, and S. Sossalla Computer-assisted diagnosis in full-field digital mammographyresults in dependence of readers experiences Breast J 16 2010 490 497
41. C.F. Nodine, and E.A. Krupinski Perceptual skill, radiology expertise, and visual test performance with NINA and WALDO Acad Radiol 5 1998 603 612 (Pubitemid 28405447)
42. J.C. Bass, and C. Chiles Visual skill Correlation with detection of solitary pulmonary nodules Invest Radiol 25 1990 994 998 (Pubitemid 20274020)
43. K.S. Berbaum, W.R. Smoker, and W.L. Smith Measurement and prediction of diagnostic performance during radiology training AJR Am J Roentgenol 145 1985 1305 1311 (Pubitemid 16202648)
44. G. Quaghebeur, J.J. Bhattacharya, and J. Murfitt Radiologists and visual acuity Eur Radiol 7 1997 41 43 (Pubitemid 127538519)
45. N.M. Safdar, K.M. Siddiqui, and F. Qureshi Vision and quality in the digital imaging environment: How much does the visual acuity of radiologists vary at an intermediate distance? AJR Am J Roentgenol 192 2009 W335 W340
46. R.S. Crowley, G.J. Naus, and J. Stewart Development of visual diagnostic expertise in pathologyan information-processing study J Am Med Inform Assoc 10 2003 39 51 (Pubitemid 36134061)
47. R.N. Haber Information-Processing Approaches to Visual Perception 1969 Rinehart and Winston New York, Holt
48. K.T. Spoehr, and S.W. Lehmkuhle Visual Information Processing 1982 W H Freeman and Company San Francisco, CA
49. C.A. Beam, E.F. Conant, and E.A. Sickles Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation J Natl Cancer Inst 95 2002 282 290 (Pubitemid 36336478)
50. S.A. Smulders, C.M. Gundy, and A. van Lingen Observer variation of 2-deoxy-2-[f-18]fluoro-d-glucose-positron emission tomography in mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer as a function of experience, and its potential clinical impact Mol Imaging Biol 9 2007 318 322 (Pubitemid 47304782)
51. J.G. Fletcher, M.H. Chen, and B.A. Herman Can radiologist training and testing ensure high performance in CT colonography? Lessons from the National CT Colonography Trial AJR Am J Roentgenol 195 2010 117 125
52. J.J. Leong, M. Nicolaou, and R.J. Emery Visual search behaviour in skeletal radiographs: A cross-specialty study Clin Radiol 62 2007 1069 1077 (Pubitemid 47500663)
53. D. Manning, S.C. Barker-Mill, and T. Donovan Time-dependent observer errors in pulmonary nodule detection Br J Radiol 79 2006 342 346
54. FoodDrug Administration FDA clears first diagnostic radiology application for mobile devices http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ ucm242295.htm Accessed March 29, 2011
55. E.A. Krupinski, and M. Kallergi Choosing a radiology workstation: Technical and clinical considerations Radiology 242 2007 671 682
56. E.A. Krupinski Medical grade vs off-the-shelf color displays: Influence on observer performance and visual search J Digit Imaging 22 2009 363 368
57. S. Langer, K. Fetterly, and J. Mandrekar ROC study of four LCD displays under typical medical center lighting conditions J Digit Imaging 19 2006 30 40 (Pubitemid 43384294)
58. Getty DJ: Improved accuracy of lesion detection in breast cancer screening with stereoscopic digital mammography. Presented at the 93rd Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America, Chicago, Illinois, November 25-30, 2007
59. T. Vertinsky, and B. Forster Prevalence of eye strain among radiologists: Influence of viewing variables on symptoms AJR Am J Roentgenol 184 2005 681 686 (Pubitemid 46657285)
60. A.G. Gale, D. Murray, and K. Millar Circadian variation in radiology A.G. Gale, F. Johnson, Theoretical and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research 1984 Elsevier Science Publishers London
61. E.E. Christensen, G.W. Dietz, R.C. Murry, and J.G. Moore The effect of fatigue on resident performance Radiology 125 1977 103 105
62. M. Al-sadi, M.F. McEntee, and E. Ryan Time of day does not affect radiologists' accuracy in breast lesion detection Proc SPIE Med Imaging 7966 2011 796608
63. E.A. Krupinski, K.S. Berbaum, and R.T. Caldwell Long radiology workdays reduce detection and accommodation accuracy J Am Coll Radiol 7 2010 698 704
64. E.A. Krupinski, and K.S. Berbaum The Medical Image Perception Society update on key issues for image perception research Radiology 253 2009 230 233