Time-dependent observer errors in pulmonary nodule detection

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 79, Issue 940, 2006, Pages 342-346

  Manning, D ^a   Barker Mill, S C ^a   Donovan, T ^a   Crawford, T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CUMBRIA   (United Kingdom)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; EXPERIENCE; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LUNG NODULE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIST; RADIOLOGIST; STAFF TRAINING; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; TIME;

ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COIN LESION, PULMONARY; EYE MOVEMENTS; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGY; ROC CURVE; TIME;

EID: 33645783277     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/13453920     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Manning DJ, Ethell S, Crawford T. An eye-tracking AFROC study of the influence of experience and training on chest x-ray interpretation. Medical imaging 2003; Image Perception Observer Performance and Technology Assessment. Editors Dev Chakraborty and Elizabeth Krupinski, Proc SPIE 2003;5034:257-266.
2. Manning DJ, Ethell SC, Crawford T, Donovan T. How do radiologists do it? The influence of experience and training on searching for chest nodules. Radiography Available online 23 March 2005. Item 49, www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/10788174.
3. Manning DJ, Ethell SC, Donovan T. Detection or decision errors? Missed lung cancer from posteroanterior chest radiograph. Br J Radiol 2004,77:231-5.
4. Chakraborty DP. Statistical power in observer performance studies: comparison of the receiver operating characteristic and free response method in tasks involving localization. Acad Radiol 2002;9:147-56.
5. Yarbus AL. Eye movements and vision. New York, NY: Plenum Press, 1967.
6. Kundel HL. Reader error, object recognition and visual search. In: Chakraborty D, Eckstein M, editors. Medical imaging 2004: image perception, observer performance and technology assessment. Proceedings of SPIE 2004;5372: 1-9.
7. Fitzgerald R. Error in radiology. Clin Radiol 2001;56:938-46.
8. Chief Medical Officer. Learning from failure: evidence and experience. An Organisation with a Memory. London: Stationery Office, 2000:1-7.
9. Gale AG. Human response to visual stimuli. In: Hendee WR, Wells PNT, editors. The perception of visual information, 2nd edition. New York, NY: Springer, 2000:134.
10. Kundel H, Nodine C, Carmody D. Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision making in pulmonary nodule detection. Invest Radiol 1978;13:175-81.
11. Kundel H, Nodine C, Krupinski E. Searching for lung nodules: visual dwell indicates locations of false positive and false negative decisions. Invest Radiol 1989;24:472-8.
12. Kundel H, Nodine C, Toto L. Searching for lung nodules: the guidance of visual scanning. Invest Radiol 1991;26: 777-81.
13. Anderson S, Auquier A, Hauk WW, Oakes D, Vandaele W, Weisberg HI. Statistical methods for comparative studies. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1980.
14. Kundel H. Visual search in medical images. In: Beutel J, Kundel H, Van Metter R, editors. Handbook of medical imaging Vol 1 Physics and psychophysics. Bellingham WA: SPIE, 2000:837-58.
15. Motulsky H. Intuitive biostatistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press Inc., 1995:Chapter 6.