ROC study of four LCD displays under typical medical center lighting conditions

Journal of Digital Imaging

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 30-40

  Langer, Steve ^a   Fetterly, Ken ^a   Mandrekar, Jay ^a   Harmsen, Scott ^a   Bartholmai, Brian ^a   Patton, Charles ^a   Bishop, Alan ^a   McCannel, Colin ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Displays; Image quality; Interstitial lung disease; ROC

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; IMAGE QUALITY; MEDICAL IMAGING; RADIOGRAPHY;

INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE; ROC; X-RAY IMAGE NOISE;

LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAYS;

ARTICLE; ILLUMINATION; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE; LIQUID CRYSTAL; PATIENT EDUCATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

ARTIFACTS; DATA DISPLAY; LIGHTING; LUNG DISEASES; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; RADIOLOGY DEPARTMENT, HOSPITAL; ROC CURVE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 33644907764     PISSN: 08971889     EISSN: 1618727X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-005-8149-y     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 18, Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems (draft), available at http://deckard.mc.duke.edu/∼samei/tg18 Accessed July 8, 2003.
2. Blume H, Steven PM, Bobb M, Ho AM, Stevens F, Muller S, Roehrig H, Fan J: Characterization of high-resolution liquid-crystal displays for medical images, Medical Imaging 2002: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Display, Proc of SPIE vol. 4681 (2002).
3. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine, Part 14: Grayscale Standard Display Function, published by National Electrical Manufacturers Association, 2001.
4. KA Fetterly BA Schueler 2003 Performance evaluation of a 'dual-side read' computed radiography system Med Phys 30 1843 1854
5. JL Fleiss B Levin MC Paik 2003 Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 3rd edn. Wiley New York
6. JC Hsu 1996 Multiple Comparisons: Theory and Methods Chapman and Hall London
7. CY Kramer 1956 Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replications Biometrics 12 307 310
8. S Langer B Bartholmai K Fetterly B Erickson S Harmson W Ryan K Andriole 2004 SCAR 3'rd R&D Symposium: Efficacy of 5 megapixel CRT vs. 3 megapixel LCD display Journal of Digital Imaging 17 3 149 157
9. Q [tmp] McNemar 1947 Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages Psychometrika 12 153 157
10. JW Tukey 1994 The problem of multiple comparisons HI Braun The Collected Works of John W. Tukey, Volume VIII. Chapter 1 Chapman and Hall New York 1 300