How does competition affect the relationship between innovation and productivity? Estimation of a CDM model for Norway

Economics of Innovation and New Technology

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 637-658

  Castellacci, Fulvio ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS NUPI   (Norway)

Author keywords

Cdm model; Cis data; Competition; Innovation; Productivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053496133     PISSN: 10438599     EISSN: 14768364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10438599.2010.516535     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ahn, S. 2002. Competition, innovation and productivity growth: A review of theory and evidence. OECD Economics Department Working Paper 317, OECD, Paris.
2. Aghion, P., N. Bloom, R. Blundell, R. Griffith, and P. Howitt. 2005. Competition and innovation: An inverted U relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120, no. 2: 701-28.
3. Aghion, P., R. Blundell, R. Griffith, P. Howitt, and S. Prantl, S. 2009. The effects of entry on incumbent innovation and productivity. Review of Economics and Statistics 91, no. 1: 20-32.
4. Aghion, P., C. Harris, and J. Vickers. 1997. Competition and growth with step-by-step innovation: An example. European Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 41, nos. 3-5: 771-82.
5. Antonelli, C. 2009. The economics of innovation: From the classical legacies to the economics of complexity. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 18, no. 7: 611-46.
6. Aw, B.Y., M. Roberts, and T. Winston. 2007. The complementary role of exports andR&Dinvestments as sources of productivity growth. The World Economy 30, no. 1: 83-104.
7. Bartelsman, E.J., and M. Doms. 2000. Understanding productivity: Lessons from longitudinal microdata. Journal of Economic Literature 38, no. 3: 569-94.
8. Beck, N. 2001. Time-series-cross-section data: What have we learned in the past few years? Annual Review of Political Science 4: 271-93.
9. Castellacci, F. 2007. Evolutionary and new growth theories. Are they converging? Journal of Economic Surveys 21, no. 3: 585-627.
10. Castellacci, F. 2008. Innovation and the competitiveness of industries: Comparing the mainstream and the evolutionary approaches. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 75, no. 7: 984-1006.
11. Castellacci, F., and J. Zheng. Forthcoming. Technological regimes, Schumpeterian patterns of innovation and firm level productivity growth. Industrial and Corporate Change.
12. Cohen, W. M., and R. Levin. 1989. Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. In Handbook of industrial organization, volume II, ed. R. Schmalensee and R.D.Willig, 1059-107. Amsterdam: North Holland.
13. Crepon, B., E. Duguet, and J. Mairesse. 1998. Research, innovation and productivity: An econometric analysis at the firm level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 7, no. 2: 115-58.
14. Geroski, P.A. 1990. Innovation, technological opportunity and market structure. Oxford Economic Papers 42, no. 3: 586-602.
15. Griffith, R., R. Harrison, and H. Simpson. 2006. Product market reform and innovation in the EU. CEPR Discussion Paper Series No. 5849, CEPR, London.
16. Griffith, R., H. Huergo, J. Mairesse, and B. Peters. 2006. Innovation and productivity across four European countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22, no. 4: 483-98.
17. Griliches, Z. 1979. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. The Bell Journal of Economics 10, no. 1: 92-116.
18. Hall, B., and J. Mairesse. 2006. Empirical studies of innovation in the knowledge-driven economy. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15, nos. 4&5: 289-99.
19. Klepper, S. 1996. Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. American Economic Review 86, no. 3: 562-83.
20. Klepper, S. 1997. Industry life cycles. Industrial and Corporate Change 6, no. 1: 145-81.
21. Kokko, A., P. Tingvall, and S. Taavo. 2010. Country preferences and exports: Can ESC votes explain international trade patterns? Mimeo. Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics.
22. Lööf, H., and A. Heshmati. 2006. On the relationship between innovation and performance: A sensitivity analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15, nos. 4&5: 317-44.
23. Malerba, F. 2005. Sectoral systems: How and why innovation differs across sectors. In The Oxford handbook of innovation, ed. J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery, and R.R. Nelson, 380-406. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Malerba, F., and L. Orsenigo. 1996. Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology-specific. Research Policy 25, no. 3: 451-78.
25. Nelson, R., and S. Winter. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
26. Nickell, S.J. 1996. Competition and corporate performance. Journal of Political Economy 104, no. 4: 724-46.
27. Nicoletti, G., and S. Scarpetta. 2004. Regulation, productivity and growth:OECDevidence. Economic Policy 18: 9-72.
28. Parisi, M.L., F. Schiantarelli, and A. Sembenelli. 2006. Productivity, innovation and R&D: Micro evidence for Italy. European Economic Review 50, no. 8: 2037-61.
29. Plümper, T., and E.V. Troeger. 2007. Efficient estimation of time-invariant and rarely changing variables in finite sample panel analyses with unit fixed effects. Political Analysis 15, no. 2: 124-39.
30. Scherer, F. 1967. Market structure and the employment of scientists and engineers. American Economic Review 57, no. 3: 524-31.
31. Sutton, J. 1997. Market structure and technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Tang, J. 2006. Competition and innovation behaviour. Research Policy 35, no. 1: 68-82.
33. Wieser, R. 2005. Research and development productivity and spillovers: Empirical evidence at the firm level. Journal of Economic Surveys 19, no. 4: 587-621.