Competition and innovation behaviour

Research Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 68-82

  Tang, Jianmin ^a  

^a INDUSTRY CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Acquisition of technology; Competition; Innovation; R D

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; STATISTICAL METHODS; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

ACQUISITION OF TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION;

COMPETITION;

EID: 31844450718     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.004     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aghion, P., et al., 2002. Competition and Innovation: An Inverted U Relationship. Working Paper 9269, National Bureau of Economic Research.
2. W.L. Baldwin, and J.T. Scott Market Structure and Technological Change 1987 Harwood Academic Publishers Chur
3. C.R. Belfield The behaviour of graduates in the SME labour market: evidence and perceptions Small Business Economics 12 3 1999 249 259
4. R. Blundell, R. Griffith, and J. van Reenen Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms Review of Economic Studies 66 3 1999 529 554
5. J. Boone Competitive pressure: the effects on investments in product and process innovation RAND Journal of Economics 31 3 2000 549 569
6. Clement, D., 2003. Creation myths: does innovation require intellectual property rights? Reason (March), http://www.reason.com/0303/fe.dc.creation. shtml.
7. W.M. Cohen, and S. Klepper Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: the case of process and product R&D Review of Economics and Statistics 78 2 1996 232 243
8. W.M. Cohen, and R.C. Levin Empirical studies of innovation and market structure R. Schmalensee R.D. Willig Handbook of Industrial Organization 1989 Elsevier Amsterdam 1059 1107
9. P. Dasgupta, and J. Stiglitz Industrial structure and the nature of innovative activity Economic Journal 90 358 1980 266 293
10. European Network for SME Research, 2003. SMEs and Access to Finance. Observatory of European SMEs, No. 2.
11. F.M. Fisher, and P. Temin Returns to scale in research and development: what does the Schumpeterian hypothesis imply? Journal of Political Economy 81 1 1973 56 70
12. G.M. Grossman, and E. Helpman Quality ladders in the theory of growth Review of Economic Studies 58 1 1991 43 61
13. M.I. Kamien, and N.L. Schwartz Market Structure and Innovation 1982 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
14. M. Kohn, and J.T. Scott Scale economies in research and development: the Schumpeterian hypothesis Journal of Industrial Economics 30 3 1982 239 249
15. C. Le, and J. Tang Innovation activities and innovation outcomes: a firm level analysis F. Gault Understanding Innovation in Canadian Industry 2003 McGill-Queen's University Press Kingston and Montreal 231 255
16. T. Lee, and L.L. Wilde Market structure and innovation: a reformulation Quarterly Journal of Economics 94 2 1980 429 436
17. R.C. Levin, W.M. Cohen, and D.C. Mowery R&D appropriability, opportunity, and market structure: new evidence on some Schumpeterian hypotheses American Economic Review 75 2 1985 20 24
18. R.C. Levin, A.K. Klevorick, R.R. Nelson, and S.G. Winter Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3 1987 The Brookings Institution Washington, DC pp. 783-831
19. G.C. Loury Market structure and innovation Quarterly Journal of Economics 93 3 1979 395 410
20. S. Martin Advanced Industrial Economics second ed. 2002 Blackwell Malden and Oxford
21. J.S. Metcalfe, and M. Boden Paradigms, strategies and the evolutionary basis of technological competition P. Swann New Technologies and the Firm: Innovation and Competition 1993 Routledge London and New York 83 102
22. Mohnen, P., Röller, L., 2001. Complementarities in Innovation Policy. Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations (CIRANO), Scientific Series.
23. S.J. Nickell Competition and corporate performance Journal of Political Economy 104 4 1996 725 746
24. O'Neill, J.E., 1998. How Increased Competition from Generic Drugs has Affected Prices and Returns in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Research Paper, U.S. Congressional Budget Office.
25. Ordover, J., Willig, R., 1983. The 1982 Department of Justice Merger Guidelines: An Economic Assessment. California Law Review.
26. P.M. Romer Are nonconvexities important for understanding growth? American Economic Review 80 2 1990 97 103
27. P.M. Romer Endogenous technological change Journal of Political Economy 98 5 1990 S71 S102
28. Schaan, S., Anderson, F., 2001. Innovation in Canadian Manufacturing: National Estimates. Cat. No. 88F0006XIB01010, 2001. Statistics Canada, Ottawa.
29. F.M. Scherer Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Perspectives 1984 MIT Press Cambridge
30. F.M. Scherer Changing perspectives on the firm size problem J.A. Zoltan D.B. Audretsch Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison 1991 Harvester Wheatsheaf New York 24 38
31. Scott, J.T., 1984. Firm versus industry variability in R&D intensity. In: Griliches, Z. (Eds.), R&D, Patents, and Productivity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 233-248.
32. J.T. Scott Purposive Diversification and Economic Performance 1993 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
33. N. Traore, and A. Rose Determinants of biotechnology utilization by the Canadian industry Research Policy 32 10 2003 1719 1735
34. J.A. Weinberg Exclusionary practices and technological competition Journal of Industrial Economics 40 2 1992 135 146
35. Weiss, L.W., Pascoe, G.A., Jr., 1986. Adjusted Concentration Ratios in Manufacturing, 1972 and 1977. Statistical Report of the Bureau of Economics. Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC.
36. R. Winter-Ebmer Firm size, earnings, and displacement risk Economic Inquiry 39 3 2001 474 486