Development of decision making: Sequential versus integrative rules

Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Volumn 111, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 87-100

  Jansen, Brenda R J ^a   van Duijvenvoorde, Anna C K ^a   Huizenga, Hilde M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Decision making rules; Development; Fuzzy trace theory; Latent group analysis; Methodology; Proportional reasoning

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; REWARD;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GAMBLING; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; REWARD;

EID: 80053384268     PISSN: 00220965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Bechara A., Damasio A.R., Damasio H., Anderson S.W. Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition 1994, 50:7-15.
2. Brandstätter E., Gigerenzer G., Hertwig R. The priority heuristic: Making choices without trade-offs. Psychological Review 2006, 113:409-432.
3. Bröder A. Decision making with the "adaptive toolbox": Influence of environmental structure, intelligence, and working memory load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:611-625.
4. Chiu Y.C., Lin C.H. Is Deck C an advantageous deck in the Iowa Gambling Task?. Behavioral and Brain Functions 2007, 3:37.
5. Crone E.A., van der Molen M.W. Developmental changes in real life decision making: Performance on a gambling task previously shown to depend on the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Developmental Neuropsychology 2004, 25:251-279.
6. Crone E.A., Vendel I., van der Molen M.W. Decision-making in disinhibited adolescents and adults: Insensitivity to future consequences or driven by immediate reward?. Personality and Individual Differences 2003, 35:1625-1641.
7. D'Acremont M., van der Linden M. Gender differences in two decision-making tasks in a community sample of adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development 2006, 30:352-358.
8. Damasio A.R. Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain 1994, Grosset/Putnam, New York.
9. Denrell J. Adaptive learning and risk taking. Psychological Review 2007, 114:177-187.
10. Dunn B.D., Dalgleish T., Lawrence A.D. The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2006, 30:239-271.
11. Evans J.St.B.T. In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7:454-459.
12. Evans J.St.B.T. The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2006, 13:378-395.
13. Everitt B.S., Hand D.J. Finite mixture distributions 1981, Chapman & Hall, London.
14. Falk R., Wilkening F. Children's construction of fair chances: Adjusting probabilities. Developmental Psychology 1998, 34:1340-1357.
15. Fein G., McGillivray S., Finn P. Older adults make less advantageous decisions than younger adults: Cognitive and psychological correlates. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2007, 13:480-489.
16. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS 2005, Sage, London.
17. Figner B., Mackinlay R.J., Wilkening F., Weber E.U. Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice. Age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:709-730.
18. Ford J.K., Schmitt N., Schechtman S.L., Hults B.M., Doherty M.L. Process tracing methods: Contributions, problems, and neglected research questions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1989, 43:75-117.
19. Fraley C., Raftery A.E. Enhanced model-based clustering, density estimation, and discriminant analysis software: MCLUST. Journal of Classification 2003, 20:263-286.
20. Garon N., Moore C. Complex decision-making in early childhood. Brain and Cognition 2004, 55:158-170.
21. Garon N., Moore C. Negative affectivity predicts individual differences in decision making for preschoolers. Journal of Genetic Psychology 2006, 167:443-462.
22. Gigerenzer G., Goldstein D.G. Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review 1996, 103:650-669.
23. Hamel R., Schmittmann V.D. The 20-minute version as a predictor of the Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement 2006, 66:1039-1046.
24. Hasher L., Zacks R.T. Automatic processing of fundamental information: The case of frequency of occurrence. American Psychologist 1984, 39:1372-1388.
25. Hertwig R., Barron G., Weber E.U., Erev I. Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychological Science 2004, 15:534-539.
26. Hooper C.J., Luciana M., Conklin H.M., Yarger R.S. Adolescents' performance on the Iowa Gambling Task: Implications for the development of decision making and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Developmental Psychology 2004, 40:1148-1158.
27. Hooper C.J., Luciana M., Wahlstrom D., Conklin H.M., Yarger R.S. Personality correlates of Iowa Gambling Task performance in healthy adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences 2008, 44:598-609.
28. Huizenga H.M., Crone E.A., Jansen B.R.J. Decision-making in healthy children, adolescents, and adults explained by the use of increasingly complex proportional reasoning rules. Developmental Science 2007, 10:814-825.
29. Hunt E. Situational constraints on normative reasoning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2000, 23:680.
30. Jansen B.R.J., van der Maas H.L.J. Statistical test of the rule assessment methodology by latent class analysis. Developmental Review 1997, 17:321-357.
31. Jansen B.R.J., van der Maas H.L.J. The development of children's rule use on the balance scale task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2002, 81:383-416.
32. Jollant F., Guillaume S., Jaussent I., Bellivier F., Leboyer M., Castelnau D., et al. Psychiatric diagnoses and personality traits associated with disadvantageous decision-making. European Psychiatry 2007, 22:455-461.
33. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology 1972, 3:430-454.
34. Klaczynski P.A., Byrnes J.P., Jacobs J.E. Introduction to the special issue. The development of decision making. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 2001, 22:225-236.
35. Kokis J.V., MacPherson R., Toplak M.E., West R.F., Stanovich K.E. Heuristic and analytic processing: Age trends and associations with cognitive ability and cognitive styles. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2002, 83:26-52.
36. Leisch F. FlexMix: A general framework for finite mixture models and latent class regression in R. Journal of Statistical Software 2004, 11:1-18.
37. Lin C.H., Chiu Y.C., Lee P.L., Hsieh J.C. Is Deck B a disadvantageous deck in the Iowa Gambling Task?. Behavioral and Brain Functions 2007, 3:16.
38. Loewenstein G.F., Weber E.U., Hsee C.K., Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin 2001, 127:267-286.
39. Luce R.D. Semiorders and a theory of utility discrimination. Econometrica 1956, 24:178-191.
40. MacPherson S.E., Phillips L.H., Della Sala S. Age, executive function, and social decision making: A dorsolateral prefrontal theory of cognitive aging. Psychology and Aging 2002, 17:598-609.
41. Morsanyi K., Handley S.J. How smart do you need to be to get it wrong? The role of cognitive capacity in the development of heuristic-based judgment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2008, 99:18-36.
42. Overman W.H. Sex differences in early childhood, adolescence, and adulthood on cognitive tasks that rely on orbital prefrontal cortex. Brain and Cognition 2004, 55:134-147.
43. Overman W.H., Frassrand K., Ansel S., Trawalter S., Bies B., Redmond A. Performance on the IOWA card task by adolescents and adults. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:1838-1851.
44. Overman W.H., Graham L., Redmond A., Eubank R., Boettcher L., Samplawski O., et al. Contemplation of moral dilemmas eliminates sex differences on the Iowa Gambling Task. Behavioral Neuroscience 2006, 120:817-825.
45. Payne J.W., Bettman J.R., Johnson E.J. Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1988, 14:534-552.
46. Raijmakers M.E.J., Jansen B.R.J., van der Maas H.L.J. Rules and development in triad classification task performance. Developmental Review 2004, 24:289-321.
47. Raven J.C., Court J.H., Raven J. Raven Progressive Matrices 1985, Author, London.
48. Reese H.W. Rules and rule governance. Cognitive and behavioristic views. Rule governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control 1989, 3-84. Plenum, New York. S.C. Hayes (Ed.).
49. Reyna V.F., Brainerd C.J. The origins of probability judgment: A review of data and theories. Subjective probability 1994, 239-272. John Wiley, New York. G. Wright, P. Ayton (Eds.).
50. Reyna V.F., Ellis S.C. Fuzzy-trace theory and framing effects in children's risky decision-making. Psychological Science 1994, 5:275-279.
51. Reyna V.F., Farley F. Risk and rationality in adolescent decision making: Implications for theory, practice, and public policy. Psychological Science 2006, 7:1-44.
52. Schlottmann A., Tring J. How children reason about gains and losses: Framing effects in judgement and choice. Swiss Journal of Psychology 2005, 64:153-171.
53. Shurman B., Horan W.P., Nuechterlein K.H. Schizophrenia patients demonstrate a distinctive pattern of decision-making impairment on the Iowa Gambling Task. Schizophrenia Research 2005, 72:215-224.
54. Siegler, R. S. (1981). Developmental sequences within and between concepts. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 46(2, Serial No. 189).
55. Stanovich K.E., Toplak M.E., West R.F. The development of rational thought: A taxonomy of heuristics and biases. Advances in Child Development and Behavior 2008, 36:251-285.
56. Stanovich K.E., West R.F. Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2000, 23:645-726.
57. Straatemeier M., van der Maas H.L.J., Jansen B.R.J. Children's knowledge of the earth: A new methodological and statistical approach. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2008, 100:276-296.
58. Toplak M.E., Jain U., Tannock R. Executive and motivational processes in adolescents with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Behavioral and Brain Functions 2005, 1:8.
59. Toplak M.E., Sorge G.B., Benoit A., West R.F., Stanovich K.E. Decision-making and cognitive abilities: A review of associations between Iowa Gambling Task performance, executive functions, and intelligence. Clinical Psychology Review 2010, 30:562-581.
60. Van den Bos R., Houx B.B., Spruijt B.M. The effect of reward magnitude differences on choosing disadvantageous decks in the Iowa Gambling Task. Biological Psychology 2006, 71:155-161.
61. Van der Maas H.L.J., Straatemeier M. How to detect cognitive strategies: Commentary on "Differentiation and integration: Guiding principles for analyzing cognitive change" Developmental Science 2008, 11:449-453.
62. Van Duijvenvoorde A.C.K., Jansen B.R.J., Visser I., Huizenga H.M. Affective and cognitive decision making in adolescents. Developmental Neuropsychology 2010, 35:539-554.
63. Von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. The theory of games and economic behavior 1944, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
64. Wilder K.E., Weinberger D.R., Goldberg T.E. Operant conditioning and the orbitofrontal cortex in schizophrenic patients: Unexpected evidence for intact functioning. Schizophrenia Research 1998, 30:169-174.
65. Yechiam E., Stout J.C., Busemeyer J.R., Rock S.L., Finn P.R. Individual differences in the response to forgone payoffs: An examination of high functioning drug abusers. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2005, 18:97-110.