Online learning for deterministic dependency parsing

EMNLP-CoNLL 2007 - Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1139-1143

  Mannem, Prashanth Reddy ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEPENDENCY PARSING; DETERMINISTIC PARSING; ENTIRE SEARCHES; HIGH DIMENSIONAL FEATURE; MEMORY BOTTLENECK; ONLINE LEARNING; ONLINE TRAINING; PARSE TREES; PARSING ALGORITHM; TRAINING FRAMEWORK;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 80053377914     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. A. Abeillé, editor. 2003. Treebanks: Building and Using Parsed Corpora. Kluwer.
2. I. Aduriz, M. J. Aranzabe, J. M. Arriola, A. Atutxa, A. Diaz de Ilarraza, A. Garmendia, and M. Oronoz. 2003. Construction of a Basque dependency treebank. In Proc. of the 2nd Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT), pages 201-204.
3. A. Boähmov́, J. Hajič, E. Hajǐcová, and B. Hladká. 2003. The PDT: a 3-level annotation scenario. In Abeilĺe (Abeilĺe, 2003), chapter 7, pages 103-127.
4. S. Buchholz, E. Marsi, A. Dubey, and Y. Krymolowski. 2006. Conll-x shared task on multilingual dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL).
5. K. Chen, C. Luo, M. Chang, F. Chen, C. Chen, C. Huang, and Z. Gao. 2003. Sinica treebank: Design criteria, representational issues and implementation. In Abeilĺe (Abeilĺe, 2003), chapter 13, pages 231-248.
6. K. Crammer, O. Dekel, S. Shalev-Shwartz, and Y. Singer. 2003. Online passive aggressive algorithms. In Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS).
7. D. Csendes, J. Csirik, T. Gyimóthy, and A. Kocsor. 2005. The Szeged Treebank. Springer.
8. J. Eisner. 1996. Three new probabilistic models for dependency parsing: An exploration. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), pages 340-345.
9. J. Hajič, O. Smrž, P. Zemánek, J. Šnaidauf, and E. Beška. 2004. Prague Arabic dependency treebank: Development in data and tools. In Proc. of the NEMLAR Intern. Conf. on Arabic Language Resources and Tools, pages 110-117.
10. R. Johansson and P. Nugues. 2006. Investigating multilingual dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-X), pages 206-210.
11. R. Johansson and P. Nugues. 2007. Extended constituent-to-dependency conversion for English. In Proc. of the 16th Nordic Conference on Computational Linguistics (NODALIDA).
12. M. Marcus, B. Santorini, and M. Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: the Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
13. M. A. Martí, M. Taulé, L. Màrquez, and M. Bertran. 2007. CESS-ECE: A multilingual and multilevel annotated corpus. Available for download from: http://www.lsi.upc.edu/∼mbertran/cess-ece/.
14. R. McDonald, K. Crammer, and F. Pereira. 2005. Online large-margin training of dependency parsers. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
15. R. McDonald, K. Lerman, and F. Pereira. 2006. Multilingual dependency analysis with a two-stage discriminative parser. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL).
16. R. McDonald. 2006. Discriminative learning and spanning tree algorithms for dependency parsing. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
17. S. Montemagni, F. Barsotti, M. Battista, N. Calzolari, O. Corazzari, A. Lenci, A. Zampolli, F. Fanciulli, M. Massetani, R. Raffaelli, R. Basili, M. T. Pazienza, D. Saracino, F. Zanzotto, N. Nana, F. Pianesi, and R. Delmonte. 2003. Building the Italian Syntactic-Semantic Treebank. In Abeilĺe (Abeilĺe, 2003), chapter 11, pages 189-210.
18. J. Nivre and J. Nilsson. 2005. Pseudo-projective dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 99-106.
19. J. Nivre, J. Hall, J. Nilson, G. Eryigit, and S. Marinov. 2006. Labeled pseudo-projective dependency parsing with support vector machines. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL).
20. J. Nivre, J. Hall, S. Kübler, R. McDonald, J. Nilsson, S. Riedel, and D. Yuret. 2007. The CoNLL 2007 shared task on dependency parsing. In Proc. of the Joint Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL).
21. J. Nivre. 2003. An efficient algorithm for projective dependency parsing. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Parsing Technologies, pages 149-160.
22. K. Oflazer, B. Say, D. Zeynep Hakkani-Tür, and G. Tür. 2003. Building a Turkish treebank. In Abeilĺe (Abeilĺe, 2003), chapter 15, pages 261-277.
23. P. Prokopidis, E. Desypri, M. Koutsombogera, H. Papageorgiou, and S. Piperidis. 2005. Theoretical and practical issues in the construction of a Greek dependency treebank. In Proc. of the 4th Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT), pages 149-160.
24. K. Sagae and A. Lavie. 2006. A best-first probabilistic shift-reduce parser. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL 2006 Main Conference Poster Sessions.
25. H. Yamada and Y. Matsumoto. 2003. Statistical dependency analysis with support vector machines. In Proceedings of IWPT-2003.