Fabrication optimization of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)/polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) nanofiltration membrane using response surface methodology

Desalination

Volumn 280, Issue 1-3, 2011, Pages 305-312

  Madaeni, S S ^a   Arast, N ^a   Rahimpour, F ^a   Arast, Y ^b  

^a RAZI UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b QOM UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Factorial design; Nanofiltration; Optimization; Phase inversion

Indexed keywords

ACRYLONITRILE BUTADIENE STYRENE; ADDITIVE CONCENTRATIONS; BLEND MEMBRANES; CONCENTRATION LEVELS; CROSS FLOWS; DIMETHYLACETAMIDE; FABRICATION OPTIMIZATION; FACTORIAL DESIGN; FULL FACTORIAL; IMMERSION PRECIPITATION; INDEPENDENT PARAMETERS; INTERACTION EFFECT; MEMBRANE MORPHOLOGY; MEMBRANE PREPARATION; MODEL ADEQUACY; MODELING AND OPTIMIZATION; OPTIMIZED CONDITIONS; OPTIMIZERS; OPTIMUM CONDITIONS; PERFORMANCE TESTS; PERMEATION EXPERIMENTS; PHASE INVERSION; POLYMER CONCENTRATIONS; PREDICTION ERRORS; REGRESSION EQUATION; REGRESSION MODEL; RESPONSE SURFACE; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; STATISTICAL DESIGN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA); BUTADIENE; COAGULATION; DESIGN; MORPHOLOGY; NANOFILTRATION; OPTIMIZATION; PRECIPITATION (CHEMICAL); REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STYRENE; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES;

DESIGN; EVAPORATION; FILTRATION; MEMBRANE; METHODOLOGY; OPTIMIZATION; ORGANIC COMPOUND; POLYMER; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

EID: 80053303118     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.07.020     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Schafer A.I., Fane A.G., Waite T.D. Nanofiltration of natural organic matter: removal, fouling and the influence of multivalent ions. Desalination 1998, 118:109-122.
2. Mattaraj S., Jarusutthirak C., Jiraratananonc R. A combined osmotic pressure and cake filtration model for cross flow nanofiltration of natural organic matter. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 322:475-483.
3. Mansourpanah Y., Madaeni S.S., Rahimpour A. Fabrication and development of interfacial polymerized thin-film composite nanofiltration membrane using different surfactants in organic phase; study of morphology and performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 343:219-228.
4. Teixeira M.R., Rosa M.J., Nystrom M. The role of membrane charge on nanofiltration performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 265:160-166.
5. Bruggen B.V., Vandecasteele C. Removal of pollutants from surface water and groundwater by nanofiltration: overview of possible applications in the drinking water industry. Environ. Pollut. 2003, 122:435-445.
6. Saitua H., Campderros M., Cerutti S., Padilla A.P. Effect of operating conditions in removal of arsenic from water by nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 2005, 172:173-180.
7. Mohammad A.W., Othaman R., Hilal N. Potential use of nanofiltration membranes in treatment of industrial wastewater from Ni-P electroless plating. Desalination 2004, 168:241-252.
8. Ballet G.T., Gzara L., Hafiane A., Dhahbi M. Transport coefficients and cadmium salt rejection in nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 2004, 167:369-376.
9. Ahmed M.T., Tahab S., Maachi R., Dorange G. The influence of physicochemistry on the retention of chromium ions during nanofiltration. Desalination 2002, 145:103-108.
10. Balanyàa T., Labandab J., Llorensb J., Sabatéa J. Separation of metal ions and chelating agents by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 345:31-35.
11. Ku Y., Chen S.W., Wang W.Y. Effect of solution composition on the removal of copper ions by nanofiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2005, 43:135-142.
12. Van der Horst H.C., Timmer J., Robbertsen M.K.T., Leenders J. Use of nanofiltration for concentration and demineralization in the dairy industry: model for mass transport. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 104:201-210.
13. Schäfer A.I., Fane A.G., Waite T.D. Cost factors and chemical pretreatment effects in the membrane filtration of waters containing natural organic matter. Water Res. 2001, 36:1509-1517.
14. Wu Ling, Song Lei, Wang Xiao-Lin, Tomi Yasuhiro, Ando Masaaki, Ohara Tomomi, Shintani Takuji Experimental study on separation performance of nanofiltration membranes for bicarbonate salts solution. Desalination 2009, 236:299-305.
15. Tang C., Chen V. Nanofiltration of textile wastewater for water reuse. Desalination 2002, 143:11-20.
16. Jiao B., Cassano A., Drioli E. Recent advances on membrane processes for the concentration of fruit juices: a review. J. Food Eng. 2004, 63:303-324.
17. Rice G.S., Kentish S.E., O'Connor A.J., Barber A.R., Pihlajamäki A., Nyström M., Stevens G.W. Analysis of separation and fouling behavior during nanofiltration of dairy ultrafiltration permeates. Desalination 2009, 236:23-29.
18. Boricha Alka G., Murthy Z.V.P. Preparation, characterization and performance of nanofiltration membranes for the treatment of electroplating industry effluent. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 65:282-289.
19. Molinari R., Buonomenna M.G., Cassano A., Drioli E. Recovery and recycle of tannins in the leather industry by nanofiltration membranes. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2004, 79:361-368.
20. Kang S.H., Chang Y.K. Removal of organic acid salts from simulated fermented broth containing succinate by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 246:49-57.
21. Van der Bruggen B. Chemical modification of polyethersulfone nanofiltration membranes: a review. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 114:630-642.
22. Mandal M.K., Dutta S., Bhattacharya P.K. Characterization of blended polymeric membranes for pervaporation of hydrazine hydrate. Chem. Eng. J. 2008, 138:10-19.
23. Marchesea J., Ansona M., Ochoaa N.A., Prádanosb P., Palaciob L., Hernándezb A. Morphology and structure of ABS membranes filled with two different activated carbons. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2006, 61:5448-5454.
24. Ismail A.F., Hassan A.R. Effect of additive contents on the performances and structural properties of asymmetric polyethersulfone (PES) nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007, 55:98-109.
25. Ismail A.F., Hassan A.R. Formation and characterization of asymmetric nanofiltration membrane: effect of shear rate and polymer concentration. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 270:57-72.
26. Mansourpanah Y., Madaeni S.S., Rahimpour A., Farhadian A. The effect of non-contact heating (microwave irradiation) and contact heating (annealing process) on properties and performance of polyethersulfone nanofiltration membranes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255:8395-8402.
27. Rahimpour A., Madaeni S.S., Ghorbani S., Shockravi A., Mansourpanah Y. The influence of sulfonated polyethersulfone (SPES) on surface nano-morphology and performance of polyethersulfone (PES) membrane. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 256:1825-1831.
28. Gao L., Tang B., Wu P. An experimental investigation of evaporation time and the relative humidity on a novel positively charged ultrafiltration membrane via dry-wet phase inversion. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 326:168-177.
29. Cojocaru C., Zakrzewska-Trznadel G. Response surface modeling and optimization of copper removal from aqua solutions using polymer assisted ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 298:52-60.
30. Ismail A.F., Lai P.Y. Development of defect-free asymmetric polysulfone membranes for gas separation using response surface methodology. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2004, 40:191-207.
31. Sivakumar M., Annadurai G., Mohan D. Studies on Box-Behnken design experiments: cellulose acetate-polyurethane ultrafiltration membranes for BSA separation. Bioprocess Eng. 1999, 21:65-68.
32. Khayet M., Cojocaru C., Garcia-Payo C. Application of response surface methodology and experimental design in direct contact membrane distillation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46(17):5673-5685.
33. Idris A., Ismail A.F., Noordin M.Y., Shilton S.J. Optimization of cellulose acetate hollow fiber reverse osmosis membrane production using Taguchi method. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 205:223-237.
34. Montgomery D.C. Design and Analysis of Experiments 1991, 1-318. Wiley, New York.
35. Mansourpanah Y., Madaeni S.S., Rahimpour A., Farhadian A., Taheri A.H. Formation of appropriate sites on nanofiltration membrane surface for binding TiO2 photo-catalyst: performance, characterization and fouling-resistant capability. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 330:297-306.
36. Ferjani E., Lajimi R.H., Deratani A., Roudesli M.S. Bulk and surface modification of cellulose diacetate based RO/NF membranes by polymethylhydrosiloxane preparation and characterization. Desalination 2002, 146:325-330.
37. Ismail A.F., Mustaffar M.I., Illias R.M., Abdullah M.S. Effect of dope extrusion rate on morphology and performance of hollow fibers membrane for ultrafiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 49:10-19.
38. Kim I.C., Yun H.G., Lee K.H. Preparation of asymmetric polyacrylonitrile membrane with small pore size by phase inversion and post-treatment process. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 199:75-84.
39. Yoo S.H., Kim J.H., Jho J.Y., Won J., Kang Y.S. Influence of the addition of PVP on the morphology of asymmetric polyimide phase inversion membranes: effect of PVP molecular weight. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 236:203-207.
40. Kim J.H., Min B.R., Park H.C., Won J., Kang Y.S. Phase behavior and morphological studies of polyimide/PVP/solvent/water systems by phase inversion. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 81:3481-3495.
41. Kunst B., Sourirajan S. Evaporation rate and equilibrium phase separation data in relation to casting conditions and performance of porous cellulose acetate reverse osmosis membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1970, 14:1983-1996.