Effect of solution composition on the removal of copper ions by nanofiltration

Separation and Purification Technology

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 135-142

  Ku, Young ^a   Chen, Shi Wei ^a   Wang, Wen Yu ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Chelates; Copper ion; Nanofiltration; Salt retention; Surfactant

Indexed keywords

COMPOSITION EFFECTS; COPPER; PERMSELECTIVE MEMBRANES; PH EFFECTS; REVERSE OSMOSIS; SALTS; SOLUTIONS; STAINLESS STEEL; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS;

ALKALINE SOLUTIONS; CHELATES; COPPER ION; SALT RETENTION;

NANOFILTRATION;

EID: 17644413576     PISSN: 13835866     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2004.10.011     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. J. Schaep, B. Van der Bruggen, C. Vandecasteele, and D. Wilms Influence of ion size and charge in nanofiltration Sep. Purif. Technol. 14 1998 155
2. F.G. Donnan Theory of membrane equilibria and membrane potentials in the presence of non-dialysing electrolytes. A contribution to physical-chemical physiology J. Membr. Sci. 100 1995 45
3. K. Mehiguene, Y. Garba, S. Taha, N. Gondrexon, and G. Dorange Influence of operating conditions on the retention of copper and cadmium in aqueous solutions by nanofiltration: experimental results and modeling Sep. Purif. Technol. 15 1999 181
4. Y. Xu, and R.E. Leburn Investigation of the solute separation by charged nanofiltration membrane: effect of pH, ionic strength and solute type J. Membr. Sci. 158 1999 93
5. G. Hagmeyer, and R. Gimbel Modeling the salt rejection of nanofiltration membranes for ternary ion mixtures and for single salts at different pH values Desalination 117 1998 247
6. K.H. Ahn, K.G. Song, H.Y. Cha, and I.T. Yeom Removal of ions in nickel electroplating rinse water using low-pressure nanofiltration Sep. Purif. Technol. 15 1999 181
7. K. Mehiguene, S. Taha, N. Gondrexon, J. Cabon, and G. Dorange Copper transfer modeling through a nanofiltration membrane in the case of ternary aqueous solution Desalination 127 2000 135
8. M. Ernst, A. Bismarck, J. Springer, and M. Jekel Zeta-potential and rejection rates of a polyethersulfone nanofiltration membrane in single salt solutions J. Membr. Sci. 165 2000 251
9. H.C. Van der Horst, J. Timmer, M.K.T. Robbertsen, and J. Leenders Use of nanofiltration for concentration and demineralization in the dairy industry: model for mass transport J. Membr. Sci. 104 1995 205
10. A.E. Childress, and S.S. Deshmukh Effect of humic substances and anionic surfactant on the surface charge and performance of reverse osmosis membrane Desalination 118 1998 167
11. G. Morel, N. Ouazzani, A. Graciaa, and J. Lachaise Surfactant modified ultrafiltration for nitrate ion removal J. Membr. Sci. 134 1997 47
12. N. Kallay Interfacial Dynamics 2000 Marcel Dekker New York
13. A.E. Childress, and M. Elimelech Relating nanofiltration membrane performance to membrane charge (electrokinetic) characteristics Environ. Sci. Technol. 34 2000 3710
14. D.B. Hough, and H.M. Rendall G.D. Parfitt C.H. Rochester Adsorption from Solution at the Solid/Liquid Interface 1983 Academic Press London
15. Z.V.P. Murthy, and S.K. Gupta Estimation of mass transfer coefficient using a combined nonlinear membrane transport and film theory model Desalination 109 1997 39
16. Z.V.P. Murthy, and S.K. Gupta Simple graphical method to estimate membrane transport parameters and mass transfer coefficient in a membrane cell Sep. Sci. Technol. 31 1996 77