Separation of metal ions and chelating agents by nanofiltration

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 345, Issue 1-2, 2009, Pages 31-35

  Balanya T ^a   Labanda, J ^b   Llorens, J ^b   Sabate J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Chelates; Citrate; Copper; Heavy metal; Nanofiltration

Indexed keywords

CHELATES; CHELATING AGENT; CITRATE; CONTAMINATED SOILS; ELECTROSTATIC INTERACTIONS; MEMBRANE CHARACTERISTICS; OPERATION VARIABLES; PROCESS EFFICIENCY; SEPARATION OF METAL IONS; STERIC HINDRANCES;

CHELATION; COPPER; HEAVY METALS; METAL IONS; METAL RECOVERY; METALS; NANOFILTRATION; SOIL POLLUTION;

EXTRACTION;

CHELATING AGENT; CITRIC ACID; COPPER; METAL ION;

ADDITION REACTION; ARTICLE; ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEAVY METAL REMOVAL; NANOFILTRATION; PH MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; STEREOSPECIFICITY;

EID: 72049114438     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.08.009     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Sikdar S., Grosse D., and Rogut I. Membrane technologies for remediating contaminated soils: a critical review. J. Membr. Sci. 151 (1998) 75-85
2. Ortega L., Lebrun R., Blais J.F., and Hausler R. Treatment of an acidic leachate containing metal ions by nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Tech. 54 (2007) 306-314
3. Volchek K., Velicogna D., Obenauf A., Somers A., Wong B., and Tremblay A.Y. Novel applications of membrane processes in soil cleanup operations. Desalination 147 (2002) 123-126
4. Pichtel J., and Pichtel T. Comparison of solvents for ex situ removal of chromium and lead from contaminated soil. Environ. Eng. Sci. 14 (1997) 97-104
5. Xu Y., and Zhao D. Removal of copper from contaminated soil by use of poly(amidoamine) dendrimers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39 (2005) 2369-2375
6. Tandy S., Bossart K., Mueller R., Ritschel J., Hauser L., Schulin R., and Nowack B. Extraction of heavy metals from soils using biodegradable chelating agents. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38 (2004) 937-944
7. Finzgar N., and Lestan D. Multi-step leaching of Pb and Zn contaminated soils with EDTA. Chemosphere 66 (2007) 824-832
8. Kim C., Lee Y., and Ong S. Factors affecting EDTA extraction of lead from lead-contaminated soils. Chemosphere 51 (2003) 845-853
9. Palma D., Ferrantelli P., Merli C., and Petrucci E. Treatment of the solution extracted from metal contaminated soils by reverse osmosis and chemical precipitation. Ann. Chim-Rome 93 (2003) 1005-1011
10. Di Palma L., Ferrantelli P., and Medici F. Heavy metals extraction from contaminated soil: recovery of the flushing solution. J. Environ. Manage. 77 (2005) 205-211
11. Xie T., and Marshall W. Approaches to soil remediation by complexometric extraction of metal contaminants with regeneration of reagents. J. Environ. Monit. 3 (2001) 411-416
12. Molinari R., Poerio T., and Argurio P. Polymer assisted ultrafiltration for copper-citric acid chelate removal from wash solutions of contaminated soil. J. Appl. Electrochem. 35 (2005) 375-380
13. Hong P., Li C., Banerji S., and Regmi T. Extraction, recovery, and biostability of EDTA for remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soil. J. Soil Contam. 8 (1999) 81-103
14. Lee C., and Marshall W. Recycling of complexometric extractants to remediate a soil contaminated with heavy metals. J. Environ. Monitor. 4 (2002) 325-329
15. Udovic M., and Lestan D. EDTA leaching of Cu contaminated soils using ozone/UV for treatment and reuse of washing solution in a closed loop. Water Air Soil Pollut. 181 (2007) 319-327
16. Molinari R., Poerio T., and Argurio P. Chemical and operational aspects in running the polymer assisted ultrafiltration for separation of copper(II)-citrate complexes from aqueous media. J. Membr. Sci. 295 (2007) 139-147
17. Bowen W.R., and Mukhtar H. Characterization and prediction of separation performance of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 112 (1996) 263-274
18. Schaep J., Vandecasteele C., Leysen R., and Doyen W. Salt retention of zirfon membranes. Sep. Purif. Tech. 14 (1998) 127-131
19. Schaep J., Vandecasteele C., Mukhtar H., and Bowen W.R. Analysis of the salt retention of nanofiltration membranes using the Donnan-steric partitioning pore model. Sep. Sci. Tech. 34 (1999) 3009-3030
20. Sabaté J., Labanda J., and Llorens J. Nanofiltration of biogenic amines in acidic conditions: influence of operation variables and modeling. J. Membr. Sci. 310 (2008) 594-601
21. Lin S., Wang T., and Juang R. Metal rejection by nanofiltration from diluted solutions in the presence of complexing agents. Sep. Sci. Tech. 39 (2004) 363-376
22. Ku Y., Chen S., and Wang W. Effect of solution composition on the removal of copper ions by nanofiltration. Sep. Purif. Tech. 43 (2005) 135-142
23. + Separation by nanofiltration-complexation with resorcinarene. Sep. Sci. Tech. 39 (2004) 2577-2595
24. Sorin A., Favre-Réguillon A., Pellet-Rostaing S., Sbaï M., Szymczyk A., Fievet P., and Lemaire M. Rejection of Gd(III) by nanofiltration assisted by complexation on charged organic membrane: influences of pH, pressure, flux, ionic strength and temperature. J. Membr. Sci. 267 (2005) 41-49
25. Favre-Réguillon A., Sorin A., Pellet-Rostaing S., Bernier G., and Lemaire M. Nanofiltration assisted by complexation: a promising process for the separation of trivalent long-lived minor actinides from lanthanides. C.R. Chimie 10 (2007) 994-1000
26. Szoke S., Patzay G., and Weiser L. Cobalt (III) EDTA complex removal from aqueous alkaline borate solutions by nanofiltration. Desalination 175 (2005) 179-185
27. Poriel L., Chitry F., Pellet-Rostaing S., Lemaire M., and Favre-Réguillon A. Zirconium and hafnium separation. Part 3. Ligand-enhanced separation of zirconium and hafnium from aqueous solution using nanofiltration. Sep. Sci. Tech. 41 (2006) 2883-2893
28. Szymczyk A., Sba M., Fievet P., and Vidonne A. Transport properties and electrokinetic characterization of an amphoteric nanofilter. Langmuir 22 (2006) 3910-3919
29. Sabaté J., Pujolà M., Labanda J., and Llorens J. Influence of pH and operation variables on biogenic amines nanofiltration. Sep. Purif. Tech. 58 (2008) 424-428
30. Tanninen J., Mänttäri M., and Nyström M. Nanofiltration of concentrated acidic copper sulphate solutions. Desalination 189 (2006) 92-96
31. Atkins P.W. Physical Chemistry. sixth ed. (1998), Oxford University Press, Oxford
32. Marcus Y. Ion Properties. sixth ed. (1997), Marcel Dekker, New York
33. García-Aleman J., and Dickson J.M. Permeation of mixed-salt solutions with commercial and pore dilled nanofiltration membranes: membrane charge inversion phenomena. J. Membr. Sci. 239 (2004) 163-172
34. Yaroshchuk A.E. Negative rejection of ions in pressure-driven membrane processes. Adv. Col. Int. Sci. 139 (2008) 150-173
35. Juang R., and Ju H. Effect of added complexing agents on extraction of Cu (II) from sulfate solutions by di(2-ethylhexyl)phosphoric acid. Sep. Sci. Tech. 36 (2001) 2499-2514