Spatial overlap enhances geographic range size conservatism

Ecography

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 671-675

  Mouillot, David ^a,b   Gaston, Kevin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIRD; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; HERITABILITY; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; PHYLOGENETICS; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; RANGE SIZE; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

AVES;

EID: 70349104773     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05679.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Barraclough, T. G. et al. 1998. Revealing the factors that promote speciation Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 353 : 241 249.
2. Böhning-Gaese, K. et al. 2006. Range size: disentangling current traits, phylogenetic and biogeographic factors Am. Nat. 167 : 555 567.
3. Chesser, R. T. Zink, R. M. 1994. Modes of speciation in birds: a test of Lynch's method Evolution 48 : 490 497.
4. Coyne, J. A. Orr, H. A. 1998. The evolutionary genetics of speciation Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 353 : 287 305.
5. Diniz-Filho, J. A. Torres, N. M. 2002. Phylogenetic comparative methods and the geographic range size - body size relationship in new world terrestrial carnivora Evol. Ecol. 16 : 351 367.
6. Gaston, K. J. 2003. The structure and dynamics of geographic ranges. Oxford Univ. Press.
7. Guernier, V. et al. 2004. Ecology drives the worldwide distribution of human diseases PLoS Biol. 2 : 740 746.
8. Hawkins, B. A. et al. 2007. Climate, niche conservatism, and the global bird diversity gradient Am. Nat. 170 : S16 S27.
9. Hunt, G. et al. 2005. Species-level heritability reaffirmed: a comment on "On the heritability of geographic range sizes" Am. Nat. 166 : 129 135.
10. Jablonski, D. 1987. Heritability at the species level: analysis of geographic ranges of Cretaceous mollusks Science 238 : 360 363.
11. Jablonski, D. Hunt, G. 2006. Larval ecology, geographic range, and species survivorship in Cretaceous mollusks: organismic versus species-level explanations Am. Nat. 168 : 556 564.
12. Kozak, K. H. Wiens, J. J. 2007. Climatic zonation drives latitudinal variation in speciation mechanisms Proc. R. Soc. B 274 : 2995 3003.
13. Mouillot, D. Gaston, K. J. 2007. Geographic range size heritability: what do neutral models with different modes of speciation predict? Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 16 : 367 380.
14. Orme, C. D. L. et al. 2005. Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat Nature 436 : 1016 1019.
15. Orme, C. D. L. et al. 2006. Global patterns of geographic range size in birds PLoS Biol. 4 : 1276 1283.
16. Peterson, A. T. et al. 1999. Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time Science 285 : 1265 1267.
17. Phillimore, A. B. et al. 2008. Sympatric speciation in birds is rare: insights from range data and simulations Am. Nat. 171 : 646 657.
18. Pielou, C. 1991. After the ice age: the return of life to glaciated North America. University of Chicago Press.
19. Qian, H. Ricklefs, R. E. 2004. Geographical distribution and ecological conservatism of disjunct genera of vascular plants in eastern Asia and eastern North America J. Ecol. 92 : 253 265.
20. Silvertown, J. et al. 2006. Phylogeny and the hierarchical organization of plant diversity Ecology 87 : S39 S49.
21. Thomas, C. D. et al. 2004. Extinction risk from climate change Nature 427 : 145 148.
22. Via, S. 2001. Sympatric speciation in animals: the ugly duckling grows up Trends Ecol. Evol. 16 : 381 390.
23. Waldron, A. 2007. Null models of geographic range size evolution reaffirm its heritability Am. Nat. 170 : 221 231.
24. Webb, T. J. Gaston, K. J. 2003. On the heritability of geographic range sizes Am. Nat. 161 : 553 566.
25. Webb, T. J. Gaston, K. J. 2005. Heritability of geographic range sizes revisited: a reply to Hunt et al Am. Nat. 166 : 136 143.
26. Wiens, J. J. Graham, C. H. 2005. Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36 : 519 539.