Evidence that the mismatch negativity to pattern violations does not vary with deviant probability

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 122, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 2236-2245

  Sculthorpe, Lauren D ^a,b   Campbell, Kenneth B ^b  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Memory comparison; Mismatch negativity; N1; Probability; Sensory memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PATTERN STIMULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; WORKING MEMORY;

ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CEREBRAL CORTEX; COGNITION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80053206698     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: 18728952     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.04.018     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Alain C., Woods D.L., Ogawa K.H. Brain indices of automatic pattern processing. NeuroReport 1994, 6:140-144.
2. Baldeweg T. ERP repetition effects and mismatch negativity generation: a predictive coding perspective. J Psychophysiol 2007, 21:204-213.
3. Bendixen A., Roeber U., Schröger E. Regularity extraction and application in dynamic auditory stimulus sequences. J Cogn Neurosci 2007, 19:1664-1677.
4. Bendixen A., Prinz W., Horváth J., Trujillo-Barreto N.J., Schröger E. Rapid extraction of auditory feature contingencies. Neuroimage 2008, 41:1111-1119.
5. Bendixen A., Schröger E. Memory trace formation for abstract auditory features and its consequences in different attentional contexts. Biol Psychol 2008, 78:231-241.
6. Butler R.A. Effect of changes in stimulus frequency and intensity on habituation of the human vertex potential. J Acoust Soc Am 1968, 44:945-950.
7. Cowan N., Winkler I., Teder W., Näätänen R. Memory prerequesites of mismatch negativity in the auditory event-related potential (ERP). J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1993, 19:909-921.
8. Deacon D., Nousak J.M., Pilotti M., Ritter W., Yang C.-M. Automatic change detection: Does the auditory system use representations of individual stimulus features or gestalts?. Psychophysiology 1998, 35:413-419.
9. Giard M.-H., Perrin F., Pernier J., Bouchet P. Brain generators implicated in the processing of auditory stimulus deviance. A topographic event-related potential study. Psychophysiology 1990, 27:627-640.
10. Grimm S., Schröger E. The processing of frequency deviations within sounds: evidence for the predictive nature of the mismatch negativity (MMN) system. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2007, 25:241-249.
11. Haenschel C., Vernon D.J., Dwivedi P., Gruzelier J.H., Baldeweg T. Event-related brain potential correlates of human auditory sensory memory-trace formation. J Neurosci 2005, 25:10494-10501.
12. Horváth J., Czigler I., Sussman E., Winkler I. Simultaneously active pre-attentive representations of local and global rules for sound sequences in the human brain. Cogn Brain Res 2001, 12:131-144.
13. Horváth J., Czigler I., Jacobsen T., Maess B., Schröger E., Winkler I. MMN or no MMN: no magnitude of deviance effect on the MMN amplitude. Psychophysiology 2008, 45:60-69.
14. Huotilainen M., Kujala A., Alku P. Long-term memory traces facilitate short-term memory trace formation in audition in humans. Neurosci Lett 2001, 310:133-136.
15. Imada T., Hari R., Loveless N., McEvoy L., Sams M. Determinants of the auditory mismatch response. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993, 87:144-153.
16. Jacobsen T., Schröger E. Is there pre-attentive memory-based comparison of pitch?. Psychophysiology 2001, 38:723-727.
17. Javitt D.C., Grochowski S., Shelley A.-M., Ritter W. Impaired mismatch negativity (MMN) generation in schizophrenia as a function of stimulus deviance, probability, and interstimulus/interdeviant interval. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998, 108:143-153.
18. May P., Tiitinen H. Mismatch negativity (MMN), the deviance-elicited auditory deflection, explained. Psychophysiology 2010, 47:66-122.
19. Molholm S., Gomes H., Lobosco J., Deacon D., Ritter W. Feature versus gestalt representation of stimuli in the mismatch negativity system of 7- to 9-year-old children. Psychophysiology 2004, 41:385-393.
20. Näätänen R., Gaillard A.W.K., Mäntysalo S. Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica 1978, 42:313-329.
21. Näätänen R, Sams M, Järvilehto T, Soininen K. Probability of deviant stimulus and event-related brain potentials. In: Psychophysiology 1980. Amsterdam: VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag Jena and Elsevier Biomedical Press; 1982. p. 397-405.
22. Näätänen R. The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behav Brain Sci 1990, 13:201-288.
23. Näätänen R., Winkler I. The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychol Bull 1999, 125:826-859.
24. Näätänen R., Kujala T., Winkler I. Auditory processing that leads to conscious perception: a unique window to central auditory processing opened by the mismatch negativity and related responses. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:4-22.
25. Picton T.W., Alain C., Otten L., Ritter W., Achim A. Mismatch negativity: different water in the same river. Audiol Neuro-otol 2000, 5:111-139.
26. Sabri M., Campbell K.B. Effects of sequential and temporal probability of deviant occurrence on mismatch negativity. Cogn Brain Res 2001, 12:171-180.
27. Sams M., Hari R., Rif J., Knuutila J. The human auditory sensory memory trace persists about 10s: Neuromagnetic evidence. J Cogn Neurosci 1993, 5:363-370.
28. Sato Y., Yabe H., Hiruma T., Sutoh T., Shinozaki N., Nashida T., et al. The effect of deviant stimulus probability on the human mismatch process. NeuroReport 2000, 11:3703-3708.
29. Sato Y., Yabe H., Todd J., Michie P., Shinozaki N., Sutoh T., et al. Impairment of a frontal attention-switch mechanism in schizophrenic patients. Biol Psychol 2002, 62:49-63.
30. Schröger E., Wolff C. Mismatch response of the human brain to changes in sound location. NeuroReport 1996, 7:3005-3008.
31. Schröger E. Mismatch negativity, a microphone into auditory memory. J Psychophysiol 2007, 21:138-146.
32. Sculthorpe L.D., Collin C.A., Campbell K.B. The influence of strongly focused visual attention on the detection of change in an auditory pattern. Brain Res 2008, 1234:78-86.
33. Sculthorpe L.D., Ouellet D.R., Campbell K.B. MMN elicitation during natural sleep to violations of an auditory pattern. Brain Res 2009, 1290:52-62.
34. Shelley A.-M., Silipo G., Javitt D.C. Diminished responsiveness of ERPs in schizophrenic subjects to changes in auditory stimulation parameters: implications for theories of cortical dysfunction. Schizophr Res 1999, 37:65-79.
35. Sinkkonen J., Kaski S., Huotilainen M., Ilmoniemi R.J., Näätänen R., Kaila K. Optimal resource allocation for novelty detection in a human auditory memory. NeuroReport 1996, 7:2479-2482.
36. Sonnadara R.R., Alain C., Trainor L.J. Effects of spatial separation and stimulus probability on the event-related potentials elicited by occasional changes in sound location. Brain Res 2006, 1071:175-185.
37. Sussman E.S., Gumenyuk V. Organization of sequential sounds in auditory memory. NeuroReport 2005, 16:1519-1523.
38. Tiitinen H., May P., Reinikainen K., Näätänen R. Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory. Nature 1994, 372:90-92.
39. Winkler I., Karmos G., Näätänen R. Adaptive modeling of the unattended acoustic environment reflected in mismatch negativity event-related potential. Brain Res 1996, 742:239-252.
40. Winkler I. Interpreting the mismatch negativity. J Psychophysiol 2007, 21:147-163.
41. Woestenburg J.C., Verbaten M.N., Slangen J.L. The removal of the eye-movement artifact from the EEG by regression analysis in the frequency domain. Biol Psychol 1983, 16:127-147.