The processing of frequency deviations within sounds: Evidence for the predictive nature of the Mismatch Negativity (MMN) system

Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience

Volumn 25, Issue 3-4, 2007, Pages 241-249

  Grimm, Sabine ^a   Schröger, Erich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Electrophysiology; Event related brain potentials; Mismatch negativity; Pre attentive change detection

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;

EID: 35348829075     PISSN: 09226028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Cowan, N. (1984). On short and long auditory stores. Psychological Bulletin, 96(2), 341-370.
2. Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and Memory: An Integrated Framework (Vol. 26). New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Deacon, D., Nousak, J. M., Pilotti, M., Ritter, W., & Yang, C. M. (1998). Automatic change detection: does the auditory system use representations of individual stimulus features or gestalts? Psychophysiology, 35(4), 413-419.
4. Deacon, D., Pilotti, M., & Tinsley, C. (1995). Is the pre-attentive comparison of auditory stimuli effected on the basis of feature or gestalt representations? Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology: Supplement, 44, 190-196.
5. Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods, 134(1), 9-21.
6. Deouell, L. Y. (in press). The frontal generator of the mismatch negativity revisited. Journal of Psychophysiology.
7. Giard, M. H., Lavikainen, J., Reinikainen, K., Perrin, F., Bertrand, O., Pernier, J., et al. (1995). Separate representations of stimulus frequency, intensity, and duration in auditory sensory memory - an event-related potential and dipole model analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(2), 133-143.
8. Gomes, H., Bernstein, R., Ritter, W., Vaughan, H. G., Jr., & Miller, J. (1997). Storage of feature conjunctions in transient auditory memory. Psychophysiology, 34(6), 712-716.
9. Gomes, H., Ritter, W., & Vaughan, H. (1995). The nature of preattentive storage in the auditory system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(1), 81-94.
10. Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24(2), 95-111.
11. Grimm, S., Roeber, U., Trujillo-Barreto, N. J., & Schröger, E. (2006). Mechanisms for detecting auditory temporal and spectral deviations operate over similar time windows but are divided differently between the two hemispheres. Neuroimage, 32(1), 275-282.
12. Grimm, S., Schröger, E., Bendixen, A., Bäß, P., Roye, A.,& Deouell, L. Y. (under revision). Optimizing the auditory distraction paradigm: Behavioral and event-related potential effects in a lateralized multi-deviant approach. Clinical Neurophysiology.
13. Huotilainen, M., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Lavikainen, J., Tiitinen, H., Alho, K., Sinkkonen, J., et al. (1993). Interaction between representations of different features of auditory sensory memory. Neuroreport, 4(11), 1279-1281.
14. Jankowiak, S., & Berti, S. (2007). Behavioral and event-related potential distraction effects with regularly occurring auditory deviants. Psychophysiology, 44(1), 79-85.
15. Kujala, T., Tervaniemi, M., & Schröger, E. (2007). The mismatch negativity in cognitive and clinical neuroscience: theoretical and methodological considerations. Biol Psychol, 74(1), 1-19.
16. Mauchly, J. W. (1940). Significance test for sphericity of a normal n-variate distribution. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 11, 204-209.
17. Molholm, S., Gomes, H., Lobosco, J., Deacon, D., & Ritter, W. (2004). Feature versus gestalt representation of stimuli in the mismatch negativity system of 7- to 9-year-old children. Psychophysiology, 41(3), 385-393.
18. Näätänen, R. (1992). Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Näätänen, R. (1995). The mismatch negativity: a powerful tool for cognitive neuroscience. Ear and Hearing, 16(1), 6-18.
20. Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A. W. K., & Mäntysalo, S. (1978). Early Selective-Attention Effect on Evoked-Potential Reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica, 42(4), 313-329.
21. Näätänen, R., Jacobsen, T., & Winkler, I. (2005). Memory-based or afferent processes in mismatch negativity (MMN): a review of the evidence. Psychophysiology, 42(1), 25-32.
22. Näätänen, R., Pakarinen, S., Rinne, T., & Takegata, R. (2004). The mismatch negativity (MMN): towards the optimal paradigm. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115(1), 140-144.
23. Näätänen, R., & Winkler, I. (1999). The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychol Bull, 125(6), 826-859.
24. Pakarinen, S., Takegata, R., Rinne, T., Huotilainen, M., & Näätänen, R. (2007). Measurement of extensive auditory discrimination profiles using the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the auditory event-related potential (ERP). Clin Neurophysiol, 118(1), 177-185.
25. Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., & Echallier, J. F. (1989). Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 72(2), 184-187.
26. Picton, T. W., Alain, C., Otten, L., Ritter, W., & Achim, A. (2000). Mismatch negativity: Different water in the same river. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 5(3-4), 111-139.
27. Ritter, W., Deacon, D., Gomes, H., Javitt, D. C., & Vaughan, H. G., Jr. (1995). The mismatch negativity of event-related potentials as a probe of transient auditory memory: a review. Ear Hear, 16(1), 52-67.
28. Ritter, W., Sussman, E., & Molholm, S. (2000). Evidence that the mismatch negativity system works on the basis of objects. Neuroreport, 11(1), 61-63.
29. Rosburg, T. (2003). Left hemispheric dipole locations of the neuromagnetic mismatch negativity to frequency, intensity and duration deviants. Cognitive Brain Research, 16(1), 83-90.
30. Schairer, K. S., Gould, H. J., & Pousson, M. A. (2001). Source generators of mismatch negativity to multiple deviant stimulus types. Brain Topography, 14(2), 117-130.
31. Schröger, E. (1997). On the detection of auditory deviations: a preattentive activation model. Psychophysiology, 34(3), 245-257.
32. Schröger, E. (2005). The mismatch negativity as a tool to study auditory processing. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 91(3), 490-501.
33. Schröger, E. (in press). Mismatch negativity: a microphone into auditory memory. Journal of Psychophysiology.
34. Sussman, E., Gomes, H., Nousak, J. M., Ritter, W., & Vaughan, H. G., Jr. (1998). Feature conjunctions and auditory sensory memory. Brain Res, 793(1-2), 95-102.
35. Takegata, R., Brattico, E., Tervaniemi, M., Varyagina, O., Näätänen, R., & Winkler, I. (2005). Preattentive representation of feature conjunctions for concurrent spatially distributed auditory objects. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 25(1), 169-179.
36. Takegata, R., & Morotomi, T. (1999). Integrated neural representation of sound and temporal features in human auditory sensory memory: an event-related potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 274(3), 207-210.
37. Warren, R. M. (1974). Auditory temporal discrimination by trained listeners. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 237-256.
38. Warren, R. M., & Ackroff, J. M. (1976). Two types of auditory sequence perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 20, 387-394.
39. Widmann, A., Kujala, T., Tervaniemi, M., Kujala, A., & Schröger, E. (2004). From symbols to sounds: visual symbolic information activates sound representations. Psychophysiology, 41(5), 709-715.