Vitalizing practice through research and research through practice: The outcomes of a conference to enhance the delivery of care

Physical Therapy

Volumn 91, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1275-1284

  Goldstein, Marc S ^a   Scalzitti, David A ^a   Bohmert, Joanell A ^b   Brennan, Gerard P ^c   Craik, Rebecca L ^d   Delitto, Anthony ^e   Field Fote, Edelle C ^f   Magistro, Charles M ^g   Powers, Christopher M ^h   Shields, Richard K ⁱ  

^a American Physical Therapy Association   (United States)

^b Anoka Hennepin ISD 11   (United States)

^c IHC Health Center South Jordan   (United States)

^d ARCADIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g Claremont   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PUBLIC RELATIONS; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

CONGRESSES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; PHYSICAL THERAPY (SPECIALTY); PLANNING TECHNIQUES; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

EID: 80053198198     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: 15386724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20100339     Document Type: Note

References (37)

1. Bechtel R, Cleland J, Smith B. Researchers and clinicians: a growing divide or narrowing gap. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006; 36:451-461.
2. English RA, Lebovitz Y, Giffin RB; Forum on Drug Discovery, Development, and Translation. Transforming Clinical Research in the United States: Challenges and Opportunities, Workshop Summary. Atlanta, GA: The National Academies Press; 2010.
3. Demers L, Poissant L. Connecting with clinicians: opportunities to strengthen rehabilitation research. Informa Healthcare. 2009;21:152-159.
4. Woolf SH. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA. 2008; 299:211-213.
5. Sung N, Crowley W Jr, Genel M, et al. Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. JAMA. 2003;289: 1278-1287.
6. Translational Research. The Ohio State University Medical Center. Available at: http://medicalcenter.osu.edu/research/translational_research/Pages/index.aspx. Accessed April 20, 2010.
7. Salbach NM. Knowledge translation, evidence-based practice, and you. Physiother Can. 2010;62:293-294.
8. About Translational Research. Institute of Translational Health Sciences. Available at: http://www.iths.org/about/transla tional. Accessed July 9, 2010.
9. Green LW, Ottoson JM, Garcia C, Hiatt RA. Diffusion theory and knowledge dissemination, utilization, and integration in public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009; 30:151-174.
10. Madon T, Hofman KJ, Kupfer L, Glass RI. Implementation science. Science. 2007; 318:1728-1729.
11. Choi BC. Understanding the basic principles of knowledge translation. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59:93.
12. Rogers JD, Martin F. Knowledge translation in disability and rehabilitation research: lessons from the application of knowledge value mapping to the case of accessible currency. Journal of Disability Policy Studies. 2009;20:110-126.
13. Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham ID. Defining knowledge translation. CMAJ. 2009;181: 165-168.
14. Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham ID. Knowledge Translation in Health Care: Moving from Evidence to Practice. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.
15. Davis D, Davis N. Selecting educational interventions for knowledge translation. CMAJ. 2010;182:E89-E93.
16. Brachaniec M, DePaul V, Elliott M, et al. Partnership in action: an innovative knowledge translation approach to improve outcomes for persons with fibromyalgia. Physiother Can. 2009;61:123-127.
17. Wensing M, Bosch M, Grol R. Developing and selecting interventions for translating knowledge to action. CMAJ. 2010;182: E85-E88.
18. Woolf SH, Johnson RE. The break-even point: when medical advances are less important than improving the fidelity with which they are delivered. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:545-552.
19. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348: 2635-2645.
20. Fritz JM, Cleland JA, Brennan GP. Does adherence to the guideline recommendation for active treatments improve the quality of care for patients with acute low back pain delivered by physical therapists? Med Care. 2007;45:973-979.
21. Petrova M, Dale J, Fulford BK. Value-based practice in primary care: easing the tensions between individual values, ethical principles and best evidence. Br J Gen Pract. 2006;56:703-709.
22. Kjeken I, Ziegler C, Skrolsvik J, et al. How to develop patient-centered research: some perspectives based on surveys among people with rheumatic diseases in Scandinavia. Phys Ther. 2010;90:450-460.
23. Tallon D, Chard J, Dieppe P. Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer. Lancet. 2000;355:2037-2040.
24. Harrison M, Légaré F, Graham ID, Fervers B. Adapting clinical practice guidelines for local context and assessing barriers to their use. CMAJ. 2010;182:E78-E84.
25. Brouwers M, Stacey D, O'Connor A. Knowledge creation: synthesis, tools and products. CMAJ. 2010;182:E68-E72.
26. Liang L. The gap between evidence and practice. Health Affairs. 2007;26:w119-w121.
27. Rutten GM, Degen S, Hendriks EJ, et al. Adherence to clinical practice guidelines for low back pain in physical therapy: do patients benefit? Phys Ther. 2010;90: 1111-1122.
28. Etheredge LM. A rapid-learning health system. Health Affairs. 2007;26:w107-w118.
29. Granger CV, Markello SJ, Graham JE, et al. The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation: report of patients with traumatic brain injury discharged from rehabilitation programs in 2000-2007. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;89: 265-278.
30. Duncan JR, Evens RG. Using information to optimize medical outcomes. JAMA. 2009;301:2383-2385.
31. Kerse N, Arroll B, Lloyd T, et al. Evidence databases, the Internet, and general practitioners: the New Zealand story. N Z Med J. 2001;114:89-91.
32. Goldstein MS. Creating a culture of collaboration: vitalizing practice through research and research through practice. Presented at: Vitalizing Practice Through Research and Research Through Practice Conference; American Physical Therapy Association; December 2-4, 2009; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
33. Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA, eds. Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's Guide. 2nd ed. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; September 2010. AHRQ Publication No. 10-EHC049.
34. Kigin CM, Rodgers MM, Wolf SL; PASS Steering Committee Members. The Physical Therapy and Society Summit (PASS) Meeting: observations and opportunities. Phys Ther. 2010;90:1555-1567.
35. Goldstein MS, Scalzitti DA, Craik RL, et al. The Revised Research Agenda for Physical Therapy. Phys Ther. 2011;91:165-174.
36. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Effective Evaluation: Improving the Usefulness of Evaluation Results Through Responsive and Naturalistic Approaches. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc Publishers; 1981.
37. Stufflebeam DL. CIPP Evaluation Model Checklist: a tool for applying the fifth installment of the CIPP Model to assess long-term enterprises. Western Michigan University. June 2002. Available at: http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists/. Accessed September 2010.