Adapting clinical practice guidelines to local context and assessing barriers to their use

CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal

Volumn 182, Issue 2, 2010, Pages

  Harrison, Margaret B ^a   Légaré, France ^b   Graham, Ian D ^c   Fervers, Béatrice ^d  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION;

GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE;

EID: 77949888621     PISSN: 08203946     EISSN: 14882329     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.081232     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006;26:13-24.
2. Straus S, Haynes RB. Managing evidence-based knowledge: the need for reliable, relevant and readable resources. CMAJ 2009;180:942-945
3. Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, et al. Evidence based medicine: how to practice and teach it. Edinburgh (UK): Elsevier; 2005. p. 95-97
4. Burgers JS, Grol R, Zaat JO, et al. Characteristics of effective clinical guidelines for general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2003;53:15-19 (Pubitemid 36040598)
5. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Available: www.nice.org.uk (accessed 2009 Sept. 15).
6. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004;8:iii-iv, 1-72.
7. Toman C, Harrison MB, Logan J. Clinical practice guidelines: necessary but not sufficient for evidence-based patient education and counseling. Patient Educ Couns 2001;42:279-287
8. GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004;328:1490-1497
9. AGREE Collaboration. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE Project. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:18-23.
10. Harrison MB, Graham ID, Lorimer K, et al. Leg-ulcer care in the community, before and after implementation of an evidence-based service. CMAJ 2005;172:1447-1452
11. Ray-Coquard I, Philip T, Lehmann M, et al. Impact of a clinical guidelines program for breast and colon cancer in a French cancer centre. JAMA 1997;278: 1591-1595
12. Ray-Coquard I, Philip T, de Laroche G, et al. A controlled "before-after" study: impact of a clinical guidelines programme and regional cancer network organization on medical practice. Br J Cancer 2002;86:313-321
13. Harrison MB, Graham ID, Lorimer K, et al. Nurse clinic versus home delivery of evidence-based community leg ulcer care: a randomized health services trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2008;8:243.
14. Fretheim A, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 3. Group composition and consultation process. Health Res Policy Syst 2006;4:15.
15. Graham ID, Harrison MB, Brouwers M, et al. Facilitating the use of evidence in practice: evaluating and adapting clinical practice guidelines for local use by health care organizations. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2002;31:599-611.
16. Graham ID, Harrison MB, Brouwers M. Evaluating and adapting practice guidelines for local use: a conceptual framework. In: Pickering S, Thompson J, editors. Clinical governance in practice. London (UK): Harcourt; 2003. p. 213-229
17. Graham ID, Harrison MB, Lorimer K, et al. Adapting national and international leg ulcer practice guidelines for local use: the Ontario Leg Ulcer Community Care Protocol. Adv Skin Wound Care 2005;18:307-318
18. Burgers JS, Cluzeau FA, Hanna SE, et al. Characteristics of high-quality guidelines: evaluation of 86 clinical guidelines developed in ten European countries and Canada. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2003;19:148-157
19. Fervers B, Burgers JS, Haugh M, et al. Adaptation of clinical guidelines: literature review and proposition for a framework and procedure. Int J Qual Health Care 2006;18:167-176
20. Shiffman RN, Shekelle P, Overhage JM, et al. Standardized reporting of clinical practice guidelines: a proposal from the Conference on Guideline Standardization. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:493-498 (Pubitemid 38124575)
21. Verkerk K, Van Veenendaal H, Severens JL, et al. Considered judgement in evidence-based guideline development. Int J Qual Health Care 2006;18:365-369 (Pubitemid 44468821)
22. Grol R, Dalhuijsen J, Thomas S, et al. Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study. BMJ 1998;317:858-861 (Pubitemid 28434555)
23. AGREE Collaboration. International assessment of quality clinical practice guidelines in oncology using the Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation instrument. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:2000-2007
24. Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Walker A, et al. Changing the behavior of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58:107-112 (Pubitemid 40174916)
25. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999;282:1458-1465
26. Ajzen I. Attitudes, personality and behavior: Berkshire (UK): Open University Press; 1988.
27. Espeland A, Baerheim A. Factors affecting general practitioners' decisions about plain radiography for back pain: implications for classification of guideline barriers - a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2003;3:8.
28. Légaré F, O'Connor AM, Graham ID, et al. Primary health care professionals' views on barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework in practice. Patient Educ Couns 2006;63:380-390
29. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999;282:1458-1465
30. Graham ID, Logan J, O'Connor A, et al. A qualitative study of physicians' perceptions of three decision aids. Patient Educ Couns 2003;50:279-283
31. Kennedy T, Regehr G, Rosenfield J, et al. Exploring the gap between knowledge and behavior: a qualitative study of clinician action following an educational intervention. Acad Med 2004;79:386-393
32. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. New York (NY): The Free Press; 1995.
33. Légaré F, Ratte S, Gravel K, et al. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Patient Educ Couns 2008;73:526-535
34. Larson E. A tool to assess barriers to adherence to hand hygiene guideline. Am J Infect Control 2004;32:48-51.
35. Davis DA, Taylor-Vaisey A. Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ 1997;157:408-416
36. Saillour-Glenisson F, Michel P. Individual and collective facilitators and barriers to the use of clinical guidelines by physicians: a literature review [article in French]. Revue Épidémiologique de Santé Publique. 2003;51:65-80.