Knowledge creation: Synthesis, tools and products

CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal

Volumn 182, Issue 2, 2010, Pages

  Brouwers, Melissa ^a   Stacey, Dawn ^b,c   O'Connor, Annette ^b,c  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b U of Ottawa School of Nursing   (Canada)

^c OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; REVIEW; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; LITERATURE; STANDARD;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 77949884002     PISSN: 08203946     EISSN: 14882329     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.081230     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006;26:13-24.
2. Grimshaw JM, Santesso N, Cumpston M, et al. Knowledge for knowledge translation: the role of the Cochrane Collaboration. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006;26: 55-62.
3. Ioannidis JPA. Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses. CMAJ 2009 DOI:10.1503/cmaj.081086.
4. Clinical Evidence. A guide to the text. How much do we know?. London (UK): BMJ Publishing Group; 2009. Available: http://clinicalevidence.bmj.com/ ceweb /about /knowledge .jsp (accessed 2009 Aug. 10).
5. Committee to Advise the Public Health Service on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 1990.
6. National Guidelines Clearinghouse (NGC). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 1998. Available: www.guideline.gov (accessed 2009 Sept. 10).
7. Browman GP, Snider A, Ellis P. Negotiating for change. The healthcare manager as catalyst for evidence-based practice: changing the healthcare environment and sharing experience. Healthc Pap 2003;3:10-22.
8. Palda VA, Davis D, Goldman J. A guide to the Canadian Medical Association handbook on clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ 2007;177:1221-1226 (Pubitemid 350178611)
9. Program in Evidence-based Care. Program in evidence-based care handbook 2008. Toronto (ON): Cancer Care Ontario; 2008. Available: www.cancercare.on.ca/ common /pages/UserFile.aspx?fileId=50876 (accessed 2009 Sept. 10).
10. The guidelines manual 2007. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2007 Available: www.nice.org.uk/aboutnice/howwework /developingniceclinicalguidelines/clinicalguidelinedevelopmentmethods/ theguidelines manual2007/the-guidelines-manual-2007.jsp (accessed 2009 Aug. 10).
11. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. SIGN 50: A guideline developer's handbook. Edinburgh (UK): Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network; 2008 Available: www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/50/index.html (accessed 2009 Aug. 10).
12. AGREE Collaboration Writing Group. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:18-21.
13. AGREE Research Trust [homepage]. The Trust; 2008 Available: www.agreetrust .org (accessed 2009 Aug. 10).
14. Fretheim A, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 3. Group composition and consultation process. Health Res Policy Syst 2006;4:15.
15. Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, et al. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach it. Edinburgh (UK): Elsevier; 2005.
16. Atkins D, Eccles M, Flottorp S, et al. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations 1: critical appraisal of existing approaches. The GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Serv Res 2004;4:38.
17. Brouwers MC, Somerfield MR, Browman GP. A for effort: learning from the application of the GRADE approach to cancer guideline development. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:1025-1026
18. Atkins D, Briss PA, Eccles M, et al. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations 2: pilot study of a new system. BMC Health Serv Res 2005;5:25.
19. Guyatt GH, Oxman A, Vist G, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008;336:924-926 (Pubitemid 351632017)
20. ADAPTE Group. ADAPTE manual for guideline adaptation. The Group; 2007. Available: www.adapte.org (accessed 2009 Aug. 10).
21. Harrison M, Legare F. Adapting clinical practice guidelines to local context and assessing barriers to their use. CMAJ. DOI:10.1503/cmaj.081232.
22. Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Thomas R, et al. Toward evidence-based quality improvement. Evidence [and its limitations] of the effectiveness of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies 1966-1998. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21(Suppl 2):S14-20.
23. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004;8:iii-iv, 1-72.
24. Grol R. Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Med Care 2001;39(Suppl 2):II46-54.
25. Grol R, Dalhuijsen J, Thomas S, et al. Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study. BMJ 1998;317:858-861 (Pubitemid 28434555)
26. Grol R, Buchan H. Clinical guidelines: What can we do to increase their use? Med J Aust 2006;185:301-302 (Pubitemid 44515428)
27. Graham ID, Beardall S, Carter AO, et al. What is the quality of drug therapy clinical practice guidelines in Canada? CMAJ 2001;165:157-163
28. Schiffman RN, Dixon J, Brandt C, et al. The guideline implementability appraisal [GLIA]: development of an instrument to identify obstacles to guideline implementation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2005;5:23. (Pubitemid 41214245)
29. Shiffman RN, Dixon J, Brandt C, et al. Guideline Implementability Appraisal (GLIA) v1.0 [Internet]. New Haven (CT): Yale University; 2005. Available: http:/ /nutmeg.med.yale.edu/glia (accessed 2009 Sept. 10).
30. Manuel DG, Kwong K, Tanuseputro P, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of different guidelines on statin treatment for preventing deaths from coronary heart disease: modelling study. BMJ 2006;332:1419.
31. O'Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V, et al. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: a Cochrane systematic review. BMJ 1999;319:731-734 (Pubitemid 29431525)
32. Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ 2006; 333:417.
33. Jacobsen MJ, O'Connor A. Population needs assessment: A workbook for assessing patients' and practitioners' decision making needs. Ottawa (ON): Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2006. Available http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/ docs/implement /Population -Needs.pdf (accessed 2009 Oct. 9).
34. Coulter A, Ellins J. Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. BMJ 2007;335:24-27 (Pubitemid 47066902)
35. Kennedy AD, Sculpher MJ, Coulter A, et al. Effects of decision aids for menorrhagia on treatment choices, health outcomes, and costs: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002;288:2701-2708
36. O'Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions [review]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;(2):CD001431.
37. Sepucha KR, Fowler FJ Jr, Mulley AG Jr. Policy support for patient-centered care: the need for measurable improvements in decision quality. Health Aff (Millwood) 2004;(Suppl Web Exclusives):VAR54-62.
38. Gravel K, Legare F, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Implement Sci 2006;1:16.