Social ecology, individual risk, and recidivism: A multilevel examination of main and moderating influences

Journal of Criminal Justice

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 452-459

  Tillyer, Marie Skubak ^a   Vose, Brenda ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053181493     PISSN: 00472352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Abrams L.S., Snyder S.M. Youth offender reentry: Models for intervention and directions for future inquiry. Children and Youth Services Review 2010, 32:1787-1795.
2. Andrews D.A., Bonta J. LSI-R the level of service inventory revised user's manual 1995, Multi-Health Systems Inc., North Tonawanda, NY.
3. Bahr S.J., Harris L., Fisher J.K., Armstrong A.H. Successful reentry: What differentiates successful and unsuccessful parolees?. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 2010, 54:667-692.
4. Bartosh D.L., Garby T., Lewis D., Gray S. Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 2003, 47:422-438.
5. Bazemore G., Stinchcomb J. A civic engagement model of reentry: Involving community through service and restorative justice. Federal Probation 2004, 68:14-24.
6. Bechtel K., Lowenkamp C.T., Latessa E.J. Assessing the risk of re-offending for juvenile offenders using the youth level of service/case management inventory. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 2007, 45:85-108.
7. Bennet T., Holloway K., Farrington D. The statistical association between drug misuse and crime: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior 2008, 13:107-118.
8. Bonta J. Native inmates: Institutional response, risk, and needs. Canadian Journal of Criminology 1989, 31:49-62.
9. Bonta J., Motiuk L.L. Utilization of an interview-based classification instrument: A study of correctional halfway houses. Criminal Justice and Behavior 1985, 12:333-352.
10. Braga A.A., Piehl A.M., Hureau D. Controlling violent offenders released to the community: An evaluation of the Boston Reentry Initiative. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 2009, 46:411-436.
11. Coulson G., Ilacqua G., Nutbrown V., Giulekas D., Cudjoe F. Predictive utility of the LSI for incarcerated female offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior 1996, 23:427-439.
12. DeLisi M. Career criminals in society 2005, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
13. Flores A., Lowenkamp C.T., Smith P., Latessa E.J. Validating the level of service inventory-revised on a sample of federal probationers. Federal Probation 2006, 70:44-49.
14. Fox K.J. Second chances: A comparison of civic engagement in offender reentry programs. Criminal Justice Review 2010, 35:335-353.
15. Garland B., Wodahl E.J., Mayfield J. Prisoner reentry in a small metropolitan community: Obstacles and policy recommendations. Criminal Justice Policy Review 2011, 22:90-110.
16. Glaze L.E., Bonczar T.B. Probation and parole in the United States, 2006 2007, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Washington, DC.
17. Gendreau P. The principles of effective intervention with offenders. Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply 1996, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. A.T. Harland (Ed.).
18. Gendreau P., Goggin C., Smith P. Is the PCL-R really the "unparalleled" measure of offender risk? A lesson in knowledge cumulation. Criminal Justice and Behavior 2002, 29:397-426.
19. Gendreau P., Little T., Goggin C. A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!. Criminology 1996, 34:575-607.
20. Gottfredson M.R., Hirschi T. A general theory of crime 1990, Standford University Press, Stanford.
21. Gottfredson S.D., Taylor R.B. Community contexts and criminal offenders. Communities and crime reduction 1988, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, UK. T. Hope, M. Shaw (Eds.).
22. Grunwald H.E., Lockwood B., Harris P.W., Mennis J. Influences of neighborhood context, individual history, and parenting behavior on recidivism among juvenile offenders. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 2010, 39:1067-1079.
23. Haynie D.L. Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter?. American Journal of Sociology 2001, 106:1013-1057.
24. Hipp J.R., Petersilia J., Turner S. Parolee recidivism in California: The effect of neighborhood context and social service agency characteristics. Criminology 2010, 48:947-979.
25. Holsinger A.M., Lowenkamp C.T., Latessa E.J. Exploring the validity of the level of service inventory-revised with native American offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice 2006, 34:331-337.
26. Kim D., Joo H., McCarty W.P. Risk assessment and classification of day reporting center clients: An actuarial approach. Criminal Justice and Behavior 2008, 35:792-811.
27. Kirk D.S. Examining the divergence across self-report and official data sources on inferences about the adolescent life-course of crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 2006, 22:107-129.
28. Kubrin C.E., Stewart E.A. Predicting who reoffends: The neglected role of neighborhood context in recidivism studies. Criminology 2006, 44:165-197.
29. Langan P.A., Levin D.J. Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994 2002, U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC.
30. Langton C.M., Barbaree H.E., Seto M.C., Peacock E.J., Harkins L., Hansen K.T. Actuarial assessment of risk for re-offense among adult sex offenders: Evaluating the predictive accuracy of the Static-2002 and five other instruments. Criminal Justice and Behavior 2007, 34:37-59.
31. Lowenkamp C.T., Holsinger A.M., Latessa E.J. Risk/need assessment, offender classification, and the role of childhood abuse. Criminal Justice and Behavior 2001, 28:543-563.
32. Lowenkamp C.T., Cullen F.T., Pratt T.C. Replicating Sampson and Grove's test of social disorganization theory: Revisiting a criminological classic. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 2003, 40:351-373.
33. Lowenkamp C.T., Bechtel K. The predictive validity of the LSI-R on a sample of offenders drawn from the records of the Iowa department of corrections data management system. Federal Probation 2007, 71:25-29.
34. Lowenkamp C.T., Lovins B., Latessa E.J. Validating the level of service inventory-revised and the level of service inventory: Screening version with a sample of probationers. The Prison Journal 2009, 89:192-204.
35. Lynch J.P., Sabol W.J. Prisoner reentry in perspective 2001, The Urban Institute, Washington, DC.
36. Makarios M., Steiner B., Travis L.F. Examining the predictors of recidivism among men and women released from prison in Ohio. Criminal Justice and Behavior 2010, 37:1377-1391.
37. Mears D.P., Wang X., Hay C., Bales W.D. Social ecology and recidivism: Implications for prisoner reentry. Criminology 2008, 46:301-340.
38. Miethe T.D., McDowall D. Contextual effects in models of criminal victimization. Social Forces 1993, 71:741-759.
39. Miles H., Raynor P. Community sentences in Jersey: Risk, need, and rehabilitation 2004, Jersey Probation and After Care Service, St. Helier, Jersey.
40. Mills J.F., Kroner D.G. The effect of discordance among violence and general recidivism risk estimates on predictive accuracy. Criminal Behavior & Mental Health 2006, 16:155-166.
41. Moffitt T.E. Adolescence-limited and life course persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review 1993, 100:674-701.
42. Murray J., Farrington D.P. Parental imprisonment: Effects on boys? antisocial behavior and delinquency through the life-course. Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry 2005, 46:1269-1278.
43. Nuttall J., Hollmen L., Staley E.M. The effect of earning a GED on recidivism rates. Journal of Correctional Education 2003, 54:90-94.
44. Osgood D.W., Chambers J.M. Social disorganization outside the metropolis: An analysis of rural youth violence. Criminology 2000, 38:81-115.
45. Ostermann M. How do former inmates perform in the community? A survival analysis of rearrests, reconvictions, and technical parole violations. Crime and Delinquency 2011, Advance online publication. 10.1177/0011128710396425.
46. Palmer E.J., Hollin C.R. The level of service inventory-revised with English women prisoners: A needs and reconviction analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior 2007, 34:971-984.
47. Phillips L.A., Lindsay M. Prison to society: A mixed methods analysis of coping with reentry. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 2011, 55:136-154.
48. Pratt T.C., Cullen F.T. Assessing macro-level predictors and theories of crime: A meta-analysis. Crime and Justice 2005, 32:373-393.
49. Raudenbush S.W., Bryk A.S. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods 2002, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. 2nd edition.
50. Raudenbush S.W., Bryk A.S., Congdon R. HLM 6 Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling 2000, Scientific Software International.
51. Raynor P., Knych J., Roberts C., Merrington S. Risk and need assessment in probation services: An evaluation 2000, Home Office Research Study 211, Home Office, London.
52. Sabol W.J., Couture H. Prison inmates at midyear 2007 2008, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC.
53. Sampson R.J., Wooldredge J.D. Linking the micro- and macro-level dimensions of lifestyle-routine activity and opportunity models of predatory victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 1987, 3:371-393.
54. Sampson R.J., Raudenbush S.W., Earls F. Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 1997, 277:918-924.
55. Sampson R.J., Groves W.B. Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. The American Journal of Sociology 1989, 94:774-802.
56. Shaw C.R., McKay H.D. Juvenile delinquency and urban areas 1942, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
57. Shields I.W. The use of the young offender-level of service inventory (YO-LSI) with adolescents. IARCA Journal on Community Corrections 1993, 5:10-26.
58. Simourd D.J. Use of dynamic risk/needs assessment instruments among long term incarcerated offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior 2004, 31:306-323.
59. Smith D.A. The neighborhood context of police behavior. Crime and Justice 1986, 8:313-341.
60. Smith P., Cullen F.T., Latessa E.J. Can 14,737 women be wrong? A meta-analysis of the LSI-R and recidivism for female offenders. Criminology & Public Policy 2009, 8:183-208.
61. Smith W.R., Frazee S.G., Davison E.L. Furthering the integration of routine activity and social disorganization theories: Small units of analysis and the study of street robbery as a diffusion process. Criminology 2000, 38:489-524.
62. Smith D.A., Visher C.A. Street-level justice: Situational determinants of police arrest decisions. Social Problems 1981, 29:167-177.
63. Spohn C., Holleran D. The effect of imprisonment on recidivism rates of felony offenders: A focus on drug offenders. Criminology 2002, 40:329-358.
64. Sung H., Mahoney A.M., Mellow J. Substance abuse treatment gap among adult parolees: Prevalence, correlates, and barriers. Criminal Justice Review 2011, 36:40-57.
65. Thornberry T.P., Krohn M.D. The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. CJ 2000: Innovations in Measurement and Analysis 2000, 33-83. National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC. D. Duffee, R.D. Crutchfield, S. Mastrofski, L. Mazerolle, D. McDowall, B. Ostrom (Eds.).
66. Ulmer J.T. Intermediate sanctions: A comparative analysis of the probability and severity of recidivism. Sociological Inquiry 2001, 71:164-193.
67. Vose B., Cullen F.T., Smith P. The empirical status of the level of service inventory. Federal Probation 2008, 72:22-29.
68. Vose B., Lowenkamp C.T., Smith P., Cullen F.T. Gender and the predictive validity of the LSI-R: A study of parolees and probationers. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 2009, 25:459-471.
69. Wang X., Mears D.P., Bales W.D. Race-specific employment contexts and recidivism. Criminology 2010, 48:1171-1211.
70. Wehrman M.M. Race, concentrated disadvantage, and recidivism: A test of interaction effects. Journal of Criminal Justice 2010, 38:538-544.
71. Wikstrom P.H., Ceccaato V., Hardie B., Treiber K. Activity fields and the dynamics of crime: Advancing knowledge about the role of the environment in crime causation. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 2010, 26:55-87.
72. Wilcox Rountree P., Land K.C., Miethe T.D. Macro-micro integration in the study of victimization: A hierarchical logistic model analysis across Seattle neighborhoods. Criminology 1994, 32:387-414.
73. Wilcox P., Madensen T.D., Tillyer M.S. Guardianship in context: Implications for burglary victimization risk and prevention. Criminology 2007, 45:771-803.
74. Zimmerman G.M. Impulsivity, offending, and the neighborhood: Investigating the person-context nexus. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 2010, 26:301-332.