The empirical status of the level of service inventor

Federal Probation

Volumn 72, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 22-29

  Vose, Brenda ^a   Cullen, Francis T ^b   Smith, Paula ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 62149130992     PISSN: 00149128     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. *Andrews, D.A. (1982). The level of supervisory inventory (LSI): The first follow-up. Ontario, Canada: Ministry of Correctional Services.
2. Andrews, D.A., Bonta, J. (1995). LSl-R the level of service inventory revised user's manual. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems Inc.
3. Andrews, D.A., Bonta, J. (1998). The psychology of criminal conduct (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Company.
4. Andrews, D.A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R.D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P, & Cullen, F.T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically-informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
5. *Andrews, D.A., Kiessling, I.J., Mickus, S., & Robinson, D. (1986). The construct validity of interview-based risk assessments in corrections. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 18,460-471.
6. Ayres, I. (2007). Super crunchers: Why thinking-by-numbers is the new way to he smart. New York: Bantam Books.
7. *Austin, J., Coleman, D., Peyton, J., & Dedel Johnson, K. (2003). Reliability and validity study of the LSl-R risk assessment instrument. Washington, DC: The Institute on Crime, Justice and Corrections.
8. *Barnoski, R., & Aos, S. (2003). Washington's offender accountability act: An analysis of the department of corrections' risk assessment. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
9. *Bechtel, K., Lowenkamp, C.T., & Latessa, E.J. (2007). Assessing the risk of re-offending for juvenile offenders using the youth level of service/case management inventory. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 45(3/4), 85-108.
10. *Bonta. J. (1989). Native inmates: Institutional response, risk, and needs. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 31,49-62.
11. Bonta, J. (2002). Offender risk assessment guidelines for selection and use. Criminal justice and Behavior, 29, 355-379.
12. Bonta, J. (1996). Risk-needs assessment and treatment. In A.T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 18-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. *Bonta, J., & Motiuk, L.L. (1985). Utilization of an interview-based classification instrument: A study of correctional halfway houses. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 333-352.
14. *Bonta, J. & Motiuk, L.L. (1987). The diversion of incarcerated offenders to correctional halfway houses. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24, 302-323.
15. *Bonta, J. & Motiuk, L.L. (1990). Classification to halfway houses: A quasi experimental evaluation. Criminology, 28,497-506.
16. *Bonta, J. & Motiuk, L.L. (1992). Inmate classification. Journal of Criminal Justice, 20, 343-353.
17. *Coulson, G., llacqua, G., Nutbrown, V., & Cud-joe, F. (1996). Predictive utility of the LSI for incarcerated female offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 427-439.
18. *Dahle, K.P. (2006). Strengths and limitations of actuarial prediction of criminal reoffence in a German prison sample: A comparative study of LSI-R, HCR-20 and PCL-R. International journal of Law & Psychiatry, 29, 431-442.
19. *Dowdy, E.R., Lacy, M.G., & Unnithan, N.P. (2002). Correctional prediction and the level of supervision inventory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30,29-39.
20. Feeley, M.M., & Simon, J. (1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology, 30,449-474.
21. *Flores, A.W., Lowenkamp, C.T., Holsinger, A.M., & Latessa, E.J. (2006). Predicting outcome with the level of service inventory revised: The importance of implementation integrity. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 523-529.
22. *Flores, A.W., Lowenkamp, C.T., Smith, P., & Latessa, E.J. (2006). Validating the level of service inventory-revised on a sample of federal probationers. Federal Probation, 70(2), 44-49.
23. *Folsom, J., & Atkinson, J.L. (2007). The generalizability of the LSI-R and the CAT to the prediction of recidivism in female offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1044-1056.
24. Gardner, W., Lidz, C.W., Mulvey, E.P., & Shaw, E.C. (1996). Clinical versus actuarial predictions of violence in patients with mental illness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 602-609.
25. Gendreau, P. (1996). Offender rehabilitation what we know and what needs to be done. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23,144-161.
26. Gendreau, P. (1996). The principles of effective intervention with offenders. In A. T Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 117-130). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. *Gendreau, P. Goggin, C.E., & Law, M.A. (1997). Predicting prison misconducts. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24,414-431.
28. *Gendreau, P., Goggin, C.E., & Smith, P. (2002). Is the PCL-R really the "unparalleled" measure of offender risk? A lesson in knowledge cumulation. Criminal justice and Behavior, 29,397-426.
29. *Gendreau, P., Little, T, & Goggin, C.E, (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works! Criminology, 34, 575-607.
30. *Girard, L, & Wormith, J.S. (2004). The predictive validity of the level of service inventory-Ontario revision on general and violent recidivism among various offender groups. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 150-181.
31. Glaze, L.E., & Bonczar, T.P. (2007). Probation and parole in the United States, 2006. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
32. Grove, W.M., & Meehl, P.E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 293-323.
33. Grove, W.M., Zald, D.H., Lebow, B.S., Snitz, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12,19-30.
34. *Hendricks, B., Werner, T., & Shipway, L. (2006). Recidivism among spousal abusers: Predictions and program evaluations. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 703-716.
35. *Hollin, C.R., & Palmer, E.J. (2006). The level of service inventory-revised profile of English prisoners: Risk and reconviction analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 347-366.
36. Hollin, C.R., Palmer, E.J., & Clark, D. (2003). The level of service inventory-revised profile of english prisoners a needs analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30,422-440.
37. *Holsinger, A.M., Lowenkamp, C.T., & Latessa, E. J. (2006). Exploring the validity of the level of service inventory-revised with native american offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34,331-337.
38. Holtfreter, K., & Culp, R. (2007). Gender and risk assessment the empirical status of the LSI-R tor women. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23,363-382.
39. *Holtfreter, K., Reisig, M.D., & Morash, M. (2004). Poverty, state capital, and recidivism among women offenders. Criminology & Public Policy, 3,185-208.
40. *Ilacqua, G.E., Coulson, G. E., Lombardo, D., & Nutbrovm, V. (1999). Predictive validity of the young offender level of service inventory for criminal recidivism of male and female young offenders. Psychological Reports, 84, 1214-1218.
41. *Kelly, C.E. & Welsh, W.N. (2008). The predictive validity of the level of service inventory-revised for drug-involved offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35,819-831.
42. *Kirkpatrick, B. (1998). Field test of the LSI-R: A study of offenders under intensive community supervision. Perspectives, 22, 24-28.
43. *Kirkpatrick, B. (1999). Exploratory research of female risk prediction and LSI-R. Corrections Compendium, 24(5), 1-3, 14-17.
44. *lowenkamp, C.T. & Bechtel, K. (2007). The predictive validity of the LSI-R on a sample of offenders drawn from the records of the Iowa department of corrections data management system. Federal Probation, 71(3), 25-29.
45. *Lowenkamp, C.T., Holsinger, A.M., & Latessa, E. J. (2001). Risk/Need assessment, offender classification, and the role of childhood abuse. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 543-563.
46. Lowenkamp, C.T., Lovins, B., & Latessa, E.J. (in press). Validating the Level of Service Invetory-Revised and the Level of Service Inventory Screening Version with a sample of probationers. Prison Journal.
47. *Lowenkamp, C.T., Smith, P., & Latessa, E.J. (2008). Can 14,737 women be wrong? A meta-analytic review of the research on the relationship between the LSI-R and recidivism among female offenders. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
48. *Marczyk, G.R., Heilbrum, K., Lander, T., & DeMatteo, D. (2003). Predicting juvenile recidivism with the PCL.:YV, MAYSI, and YLS/CMI. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 2,7-18.
49. *Miles, H., & Raynor, P. (2004). Community sentences in jersey: Risk, need and rehabilitation. St. Helier, Jersey: Jersey Probation and After Care Service.
50. *Mills, J.F., Kroner, D.G., & Hemmati, T. (2003). Predicting violent behavior through a static-stable variable lens. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18,891-904.
51. *Mills, J.R, Jones, M. N., & Kroner, D. G. (2005). An examination of the generalizability of the LSI-Rand VRAG probability bins. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32,565-585.
52. *Mills, J.F., & Kroner, D.G. (2006). The effect of discordance among violence and general recidivism risk estimates on predictive accuracy. Criminal Behaviour & Mental Health, 16,155-166,
53. *Motiuk, L.L., Bonta, J., & Andrews, D.A. (1986). Classification in correctional halfway houses the relative and incremental predictive criterion validities of the Megargee-MMPI and LSI systems. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 13,33-46.
54. *Motiuk, M.S., Motiuk, L.L., & Bonta, J, (1992). A comparison between self-report and interview-based inventories in offender classification. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 19,143-159.
55. *O'Keefe, M.L., Klebe, K., & Hromas, S. (1998). Validation of the level of supervision inventory (LSI) for community based offenders in Colorado: Phase II. Colorado Spring, CO: Colorado Department of Corrections.
56. *Palmer, E.J., & Hollin, C.R. (2007). The level of service inventory-revised with English women prisoners a needs and reconviction analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 971-984.
57. Raynor, P. (2007). Risk and need assessment in British probation: The contribution of LS1-R. Psychology, Crime & Law, 13,125-138.
58. *Raynor, P., Knych, J., Roberts, C, & Merrington, S. (2000). Risk and need assessment in probation services: An evaluation. Home Office Research Study 211. London: Home Office.
59. *Reisig, M.D., Holtfreter, K., & Morash, M. (2006). Assessing recidivism risk across female pathways to crime. Justice Quarterly, 23,384-405.
60. Sarbin, T.R. (1943). A contribution to the study of actuarial and individual methods of prediction. American Journal of Sociology, 48(5), 593-602.
61. *Sehlager, M.D., & Simourd, D.J. (2007). Validity of the level of service inventory-revised (LSI-R) among african american and his-panic male offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34,545-554
62. *Schmidt, F., Hoge, R.D., & Gomes, L. (2005). Reliability and validity analyses of the youth level of services/case management inventory. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 329-344.
63. *Shields, I.W. (1993). The use of the young offender-level of service inventory (YO-LSI) with adolescents. IARCA Journal on Community Corrections, 5,10,26.
64. *Simourd, D.J. (2004). Use of Dynamic Risk/ Needs Assessment Instruments Among Long Term Incarcerated Offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 306-323.
65. Van Voorhis, P. (2000). An overview of offender classification systems. In P. Van Voorhis, M. Braswell, & D. Lester (Eds.), Correctional counseling & rehabilitation (4th ed., pp. 81-108). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Company.
66. *Vose, B. (2008). Assessing the predictive validity of the level of service inventory revised: Recidivism among Iowa parolees and probationers. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati.