Efficient summary statistical representation when change localization fails

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 855-859

  Haberman, Jason ^a,c   Whitney, David ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Change blindness; Face perception; Object recognition; Visual awareness

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053110055     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0125-6     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Albrecht, A. R., & Scholl, B. J. (2010). Perceptually averaging in a continuous visual world: Extracting statistical summary representations over time. Psychological Science, 21, 560-567. doi: 10. 1177/0956797610363543.
2. Alvarez, G. A. (2011). Representing multiple objects as an ensemble enhances visual cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 122-131. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2011. 01. 003.
3. Alvarez, G. A., & Oliva, A. (2008). The representation of simple ensemble visual features outside the focus of attention. Psychological Science, 19, 392-398. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9280. 2008. 02098. x.
4. Alvarez, G. A., & Oliva, A. (2009). Spatial ensemble statistics are efficient codes that can be represented with reduced attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 7345-7350. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0808981106.
5. Ariely, D. (2001). Seeing sets: Representation by statistical properties. Psychological Science, 12, 157-162.
6. Beck, M. R., & Levin, D. T. (2003). The role of representational volatility in recognizing pre- and postchange objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 458-468.
7. Bulakowski, P. F., Bressler, D. W., & Whitney, D. (2007). Shared attentional resources for global and local motion processing. Journal of Vision, 7(10), 10: 1-10. doi: 10. 1167/7. 10. 10.
8. Chong, S. C., & Treisman, A. (2003). Representation of statistical properties. Vision Research, 43, 393-404. doi: 10. 1016/S0042-6989(02)00596-5.
9. Dakin, S. C., & Watt, R. J. (1997). The computation of orientation statistics from visual texture. Vision Research, 37, 3181-3192.
10. de Fockert, J., & Wolfenstein, C. (2009). Rapid extraction of mean identity from sets of faces. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1716-1722. doi: 10. 1080/17470210902811249.
11. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1976). Pictures of facial affect. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
12. Fernandez-Duque, D., & Thornton, I. M. (2000). Change detection without awareness: Do explicit reports underestimate the representation of change in the visual system? Visual Cognition, 7, 323-344.
13. Friedman, A. (1979). Framing pictures: Role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 316-355.
14. Haberman J, Harp T, Whitney D (2009) Averaging facial expression over time. Journal of Vision, 9(11), 1: 1-13. doi: 10. 1167/9. 11. 1.
15. Haberman, J., & Whitney, D. (2007). Rapid extraction of mean emotion and gender from sets of faces. Current Biology, 17, R751-R753.
16. Haberman, J., & Whitney, D. (2009). Seeing the mean: Ensemble coding for sets of faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 718-734. doi: 10. 1037/a0013899.
17. Haberman, J., & Whitney, D. (2010). The visual system discounts emotional deviants when extracting average expression. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 1825-1838. doi: 10. 3758/APP. 72. 7. 1825.
18. Haberman, J., & Whitney, D. (2011). Ensemble perception: Summarizing the scene and broadening the limits of visual processing. Chapter to appear in an edited volume, A Festschrift in honor of Anne Treisman, Wolfe, J. & Robertson, L., (eds), (in press).
19. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). High-level scene perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 243-271. doi: 10. 1146/annurev. psych. 50. 1. 243.
20. Hollingworth, A. (2003). Failures of retrieval and comparison constrain change detection in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 388-403.
21. Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2004). Sustained change blindness to incremental scene rotation: A dissociation between explicit change detection and visual memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 800-807.
22. Mitroff, S. R., Simons, D. J., & Franconeri, S. L. (2002). The siren song of implicit change detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 798-815. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 28. 4. 798.
23. Mitroff, S. R., Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (2004). Nothing compares 2 views: Change blindness can occur despite preserved access to the changed information. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1268-1281. doi: 10. 3758/BF03194997.
24. Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2001). Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope. International Journal of Computer Vision, 42, 145-175.
25. Parkes, L., Lund, J., Angelucci, A., Solomon, J. A., & Morgan, M. (2001). Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 739-744.
26. Pashler, H. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 369-378.
27. Phillips, W. A. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 283-290. doi: 10. 3758/BF03203943.
28. Potter, M. C. (1976). Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 509-522.
29. Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9280. 1997. tb00427. x.
30. Simons, D. J., & Ambinder, M. S. (2005). Change blindness-Theory and consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 44-48.
31. Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28, 1059-1074. doi: 10. 1068/p2952.
32. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 644-649.
33. Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381, 520-522.
34. Torralba, A., & Oliva, A. (2003). Statistics of natural image categories. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 14, 391-412. doi: 10. 1088/0954-898X_14_3_302.
35. Watamaniuk, S. N. J., & Duchon, A. (1992). The human visual-system averages speed information. Vision Research, 32, 931-941.
36. Watamaniuk, S. N. J., & McKee, S. P. (1998). Simultaneous encoding of direction at a local and global scale. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 191-200.
37. Watanabe, K. (2003). Differential effect of distractor timing on localizing versus identifying visual changes. Cognition, 88, 243-257.
38. Williams, D. W., & Sekuler, R. (1984). Coherent global motion percepts from stochastic local motions. Vision Research, 24, 55-62. doi: 10. 1016/0042-6989(84)90144-5.