Sustained change blindness to incremental scene rotation: A dissociation between explicit change detection and visual memory

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 66, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 800-807

  Hollingworth, Andrew ^a,c   Henderson, John M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c E11 SSH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 7944228727     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194974     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. CHUA, K.-P., & CHUN, M. M. (2003). Implicit scene learning is viewpoint dependent. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 72-80.
2. DIWADKAR, V. A., & MCNAMARA, T. P. (1997). Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science, 8, 302-307.
3. FERNÁNDEZ-DUQUE, D., & THORNTON, I. M. (2000). Change detection without awareness: Do explicit reports underestimate the representation of change in the visual system? Visual Cognition, 7, 324-344.
4. HAYHOE, M. M., BENSINGER, D. G., & BALLARD, D. H. (1998). Task constraints in visual working memory. Vision Research, 38, 125-137.
5. HENDERSON, J. M., & HOLLINOWORTH, A. (2003a). Eye movements and visual memory: Detecting changes to saccade targets in scenes. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 58-71.
6. HENDERSON, J. M., & HOLLINGWORTH, A. (2003b). Global transsaccadic change blindness during scene perception. Psychological Science, 14, 493-497.
7. HOLLINGWORTH, A. (2003). Failures of retrieval and comparison constrain change detection in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 388-403.
8. HOLLINGWORTH, A. (2004). Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: The roles of short- and long-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 519-537.
9. HOLLINGWORTH, A., & HENDERSON, J. M. (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 113-136.
10. HOLLINGWORTH, A., WILLIAMS, C. C., & HENDERSON, J. M. (2001). To see and remember: Visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 761-768.
11. IRWIN, D. E. (1991). Information integration across saccadic eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 20-456.
12. MCCLOSKEY, M., & ZARAGOZA, M. (1985). Misleading postevent information and memory for events: Arguments and evidence against memory impairment hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 1-16.
13. MITROFF, S. R., SIMONS, D. J., & FRANCONERI, S. L. (2002). The siren song of implicit change detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 798-815.
14. MITROFF, S. R., SIMONS, D. J., & LEVIN, D. T. (in press). Nothing compares 2 views: Change blindness can result from failures to compare retained information. Perception & Psychophysics.
15. O'REGAN, J. K. (1992). Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 461-488.
16. O'REGAN, J. K., & NOË, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 939-1011.
17. RENSINK, R. A., O'REGAN, J. K., & CLARK, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373.
18. SIMONS, D. J. (1996). In sight, out of mind: When object representations fail. Psychological Science, 7, 301-305.
19. SIMONS, D. J. (2000). Current approaches to change blindness. Visual Cognition 7, 1-16.
20. SIMONS, D. J., CHABRIS, C. F., SCHNUR, T. T., & LEVIN, D. T. (2002). Evidence for preserved representations in change blindness. Consciousness & Cognition, 11, 78-97.
21. SIMONS, D. J., FRANCONERI, S. L., & REIMER, R. L. (2000). Change blindness in the absence of visual disruption. Perception, 29, 1143-1154.
22. SIMONS, D. J., & WANG, R. F. (1998). Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes. Psychological Science, 9, 315-320.
23. TARR, M. J., & BÜLTHOFF, H. H. (1998). Image-based object recognition in man, monkey, and machine. In M. J. Tarr & H. H. Bülthoff (Eds.), Object recognition in man, monkey, and machine (pp. 1-20). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. WILLIAMS, P., & SIMONS, D. J. (2000). Detecting changes in novel 3D objects: Effects of change magnitude, spatiotemporal continuity, and stimulus familiarity. Visual Cognition, 7, 297-322.