Cognitive anchoring on self-generated decisions reduces operator reliance on automated diagnostic aids

Human Factors

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 332-341

  Madhavan, Poornima ^a   Wiegmann, Douglas A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC AIDS; SELF-GENERATED DIAGNOSES; SYSTEM FAILURES;

AUTOMATION; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; FEEDBACK; RISK ANALYSIS;

DECISION MAKING;

ARTICLE; AUTOANALYSIS; AUTOMATION; COGNITION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC KIT; HUMAN; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; LABORATORY AUTOMATION; OPERATOR; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; SELF EVALUATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EQUIPMENT; PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY; UNITED STATES;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; AUTOMATION; COGNITION; COGNITIVE DISSONANCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; HUMANS; ILLINOIS; PROTECTIVE DEVICES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 26944443722     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1518/0018720054679489     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Block, R. A., & Harper, D. R. (1991). Overconfidence in estimation: Testing the anchoring-and-adjustment hypothesis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49, 188-207.
2. Brehm, J., & Cohen, A. R. (1962). Explorations in cognitive dissonance. New York: Wiley.
3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Erlbaum.
5. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
6. Dzindolet, M. T., Pierce, L. G., Beck, H. P., & Dawe, L. A. (2002). The perceived utility of human and automated aids in a visual detection task. Human Factors, 44, 79-94.
7. Dzindolet, M. T., Pierce, L. G., Beck, H. P., Dawe, L. A., & Anderson, B. W. (2001). Predicting misuse and disuse of combat identification systems. Military Psychology, 13, 147-164.
8. Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1982). Theory of diagnostic interference: 1. Imagination and the psychophysics of evidence (Tech. Report No. 2). Chicago: University of Chicago, School of Business.
9. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10. Harvey, J. H., Town, J. P., & Yarkin, L. K. (1981). How fundamental is the "fundamental attribution error"? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 346-349.
11. Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1992). Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 1-55.
12. Krull, D. S. (2001). On partitioning the fundamental attribution error: Dispositionalism and the correspondence bias. In G. B. Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the Legacy and Future of Social Cognition (pp. 211-227). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Lee, J., & Moray, N. (1992). Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics, 35, 1243-1270.
14. Oshikawa, S. (1970). Consumer pre-decision conflict and post-decision dissonance. Behavioral Science, 15, 132-140.
15. Parasuraman, R., Hancock, P. A., & Olofinboba, O. (1997). Alarm effectiveness in driver-centered collision-warning systems. Ergonomics, 40, 390-399.
16. Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39, 230-253.
17. Riley, V. (1989). A general model of mixed-initiative human-machine systems. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting (pp. 124-128). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
18. Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
19. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
20. Wickens, C. D., & Hollands, J. G. (2000). Engineering psychology and human performance (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21. Wiegmann, D. A. (2002). Agreeing with automated diagnostic aids: A study of users' concurrence strategies. Human Factors, 44, 44-50.
22. Wiegmann, D. A., Rich, A., & Zhang, H. (2001). Automated diagnostic aids: The effects of aid reliability on users' trust and reliance. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2, 352-367.