Impact of introduction of wire-guided cannulation in therapeutic biliary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)

Volumn 26, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1552-1558

  Nakai, Yousuke ^a   Isayama, Hiroyuki ^a   Tsujino, Takeshi ^a   Sasahira, Naoki ^a   Hirano, Kenji ^a   Kogure, Hirofumi ^a   Sasaki, Takashi ^a   Kawakubo, Kazumichi ^a   Yagioka, Hiroshi ^a   Yashima, Yoko ^a   Mizuno, Suguru ^a   Yamamto, Keisuke ^a   Arizumi, Toshihiko ^a   Togawa, Osamu ^a   Matsubara, Saburo ^a   Yamamoto, Natsuyo ^a   Tada, Minoru ^a   Omata, Masao ^b   Koike, Kazuhiko ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b YAMANASHI PREFECTURAL CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Learning curve; Post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis; Wire guided cannulation

Indexed keywords

AMYLASE; CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; AMYLASE BLOOD LEVEL; ARTICLE; CANNULATION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GUIDE WIRE; HUMAN; HYPERAMYLASEMIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TIME; WIRE GUIDED BILIARY CANNULATION;

EID: 80053107079     PISSN: 08159319     EISSN: 14401746     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06788.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Cavallini G, Tittobello A, Frulloni L, Masci E, Mariana A, Di Francesco V. Gabexate for the prevention of pancreatic damage related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gabexate in digestive endoscopy-Italian group. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996; 335: 919-23.
2. Masci E, Cavallini G, Mariani A etal. Comparison of two dosing regimens of gabexate in the prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2003; 98: 2182-6.
3. Murray B, Carter R, Imrie C, Evans S, O'Suilleabhain C. Diclofenac reduces the incidence of acute pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 2003; 124: 1786-91.
4. Andriulli A, Solmi L, Loperfido S etal. Prophylaxis of ERCP-related pancreatitis: a randomized, controlled trial of somatostatin and gabexate mesylate. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2004; 2: 713-18.
5. Katsinelos P, Kountouras J, Chatzis J etal. High-dose allopurinol for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2005; 61: 407-15.
6. Mosler P, Sherman S, Marks J etal. Oral allopurinol does not prevent the frequency or the severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2005; 62: 245-50.
7. Tsujino T, Komatsu Y, Isayama H etal. Ulinastatin for pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized, controlled trial. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2005; 3: 376-83.
8. Li ZS, Pan X, Zhang WJ etal. Effect of octreotide administration in the prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia: a multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2007; 102: 46-51.
9. Elmunzer BJ, Waljee AK, Elta GH, Taylor JR, Fehmi SM, Higgins PD. A meta-analysis of rectal NSAIDs in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gut 2008; 57: 1262-7.
10. Bai Y, Xu C, Yang X, Gao J, Zou DW, Li ZS. Glyceryl trinitrate for prevention of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 690-5.
11. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G etal. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1998; 48: 1-10.
12. Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB etal. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2001; 54: 425-34.
13. Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TC etal. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2002; 56: 652-6.
14. Masci E, Mariani A, Curioni S, Testoni PA. Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 830-4.
15. Freeman ML, Guda NM. Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a comprehensive review. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2004; 59: 845-64.
16. Tsujino T, Isayama H, Komatsu Y etal. Risk factors for pancreatitis in patients with common bile duct stones managed by endoscopic papillary balloon dilation. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2005; 100: 38-42.
17. Cheng CL, Sherman S, Watkins JL etal. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2006; 101: 139-47.
18. Cotton PB, Garrow DA, Gallagher J, Romagnuolo J. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2009; 70: 80-8.
19. Siegel JH, Pullano W. Two new methods for selective bile duct cannulation and sphincterotomy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1987; 33: 438-40.
20. Lella F, Bagnolo F, Colombo E, Bonassi U. A simple way of avoiding post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2004; 59: 830-4.
21. Artifon EL, Sakai P, Cunha JE, Halwan B, Ishioka S, Kumar A. Guidewire cannulation reduces risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and facilitates bile duct cannulation. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2007; 102: 2147-53.
22. Lee TH, Park H, Park JY etal. Can wire-guided cannulation prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2009; 69: 444-9.
23. Bailey AA, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ etal. A prospective randomized trial of cannulation technique in ERCP: effects on technical success and post-ERCP pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 296-301.
24. Katsinelos P, Paroutoglou G, Kountouras J etal. A comparative study of standard ERCP catheter and hydrophilic guide wire in the selective cannulation of the common bile duct. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 302-7.
25. Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Zagari RM etal. Can a wire-guided cannulation technique increase bile duct cannulation rate and prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2009; 104: 2343-50.
26. Cheung J, Tsoi KK, Quan WL, Lau JY, Sung JJ. Guidewire versus conventional contrast cannulation of the common bile duct for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2009; 70: 1211-19.
27. Maeda S, Hayashi H, Hosokawa O etal. Prospective randomized pilot trial of selective biliary cannulation using pancreatic guide-wire placement. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 721-4.
28. Ito K, Fujita N, Noda Y etal. Pancreatic guidewire placement for achieving selective biliary cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography. World J. Gastroenterol. 2008; 14: 5595-600.
29. Herreros de Tejada A, Calleja JL, Diaz G etal. Double-guidewire technique for difficult bile duct cannulation: a multicenter randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2009; 70: 700-9.
30. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J etal. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1991; 37: 383-93.
31. Harewood GC, Baron TH. An assessment of the learning curve for precut biliary sphincterotomy. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2002; 97: 1708-12.
32. Verma D, Gostout CJ, Petersen BT, Levy MJ, Baron TH, Adler DG. Establishing a true assessment of endoscopic competence in ERCP during training and beyond: a single-operator learning curve for deep biliary cannulation in patients with native papillary anatomy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2007; 65: 394-400.
33. Akaraviputh T, Lohsiriwat V, Swangsri J, Methasate A, Leelakusolvong S, Lertakayamanee N. The learning curve for safety and success of precut sphincterotomy for therapeutic ERCP: a single endoscopist's experience. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 513-16.