Double-guidewire technique for difficult bile duct cannulation: a multicenter randomized, controlled trial

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 70, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 700-709

  Herreros de Tejada, Alberto ^a   Calleja, Jose Luis ^a   Díaz, Gonzalo ^a   Pertejo, Virginia ^a   Espinel, Jesús ^a   Cacho, Guillermo ^a   Jiménez, Javier ^a   Millán, Isabel ^a   García, Fernando ^a   Abreu, Luis ^a  

^a Clinical Epidemiology Unit   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION PNEUMONIA; BILE DUCT; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; BLEEDING; CANNULATION; CHOLANGITIS; CHOLECYSTITIS; CHOLESTASIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEATH; DOUBLE GUIDEWIRE TECHNIQUE; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GUIDE WIRE; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC DISEASE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PANCREAS DISEASE; PANCREATITIS; PERFORATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARD; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; TREATMENT FAILURE; VATER PAPILLA STENOSIS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CATHETERIZATION; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; COMMON BILE DUCT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 70349456396     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.03.031     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. NIH state-of-the-science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy. NIH Consens State Sci Statements 19 (2002) 1-26
2. Freeman M.L., Nelson D.B., Sherman S., et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 335 (1996) 909-918
3. Loperfido S., Angelini G., Benedetti G., et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 48 (1998) 1-10
4. Masci E., Toti G., Mariani A., et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 96 (2001) 417-423
5. Williams E.J., Taylor S., Fairclough P., et al. Risk factors for complication following ERCP; results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 39 (2007) 793-801
6. Freeman M.L., DiSario J.A., Nelson D.B., et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 54 (2001) 425-434
7. Vandervoort J., Soetikno R.M., Tham T.C., et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 56 (2002) 652-656
8. Friedland S., Soetikno R.M., Vandervoort J., et al. Bedside scoring system to predict the risk of developing pancreatitis following ERCP. Endoscopy 34 (2002) 483-488
9. Freeman M.L., Nelson D.B., Sherman S., et al. Same-day discharge after endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy: observations from a prospective multicenter complication study. The Multicenter Endoscopic Sphincterotomy (MESH) Study Group. Gastrointest Endosc 49 (1999) 580-586
10. Johnson G.K., Geenen J.E., Johanson J.F., et al. Evaluation of post-ERCP pancreatitis: potential causes noted during controlled study of differing contrast media. Midwest Pancreaticobiliary Study Group. Gastrointest Endosc 46 (1997) 217-222
11. Bailey A.A., Bourke M.J., Williams S.J., et al. A prospective randomized trial of cannulation technique in ERCP: effects on technical success and post-ERCP pancreatitis. Endoscopy 40 (2008) 296-301
12. Seifert H., Binmoeller K.F., Schmitt T., et al. Ein neues papillotom fur sondierung, vorschnitt oder konventionelle papillotomie. [German]. Z Gastroenterol 37 (1999) 1151-1155
13. Siegel J.H. Precut papillotomy: a method to improve success of ERCP and papillotomy. Endoscopy 12 (1980) 130-133
14. Weston A.P. Sincalide: a cholecystokinin agonist as an aid in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-a prospective assessment. J Clin Gastroenterol 24 (1997) 227-230
15. Slivka A. A new technique to assist in bile duct cannulation. Gastrointest Endosc 44 (1996) 636
16. Fry L.C., Barriga J.A., Linder J.D., et al. Placement of a biliary catheter in the pancreatic duct to aid common bile duct cannulation. Endoscopy 35 (2003) 97
17. Dumonceau J.M., Deviere J., and Cremer M. A new method of achieving deep cannulation of the common bile duct during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy 30 Suppl (1998) S80
18. Gyokeres T., Duhl J., Varsanyi M., et al. Double guide wire placement for endoscopic pancreaticobiliary procedures. Endoscopy 35 (2003) 95-96
19. Maeda S., Hayashi H., Hosokawa O., et al. Prospective randomized pilot trial of selective biliary cannulation using pancreatic guide-wire placement. Endoscopy 35 (2003) 721-724
20. Gotoh Y., Tamada K., Tomiyama T., et al. A new method for deep cannulation of the bile duct by straightening the pancreatic duct. Gastrointest Endosc 53 (2001) 820-822
21. Draganov P., Devonshire D.A., and Cunningham J.T. A new technique to assist in difficult bile duct cannulation at the time of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. JSLS 9 (2005) 218-221
22. Kramer R.E., Azuaje R.E., Martinez J.M., et al. The double-wire technique as an aid to selective cannulation of the common bile duct during pediatric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 45 (2007) 438-442
23. Shahzad I., Prashant S., Shashin S., et al. Role of double guide wire cannulation during ERCP. [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 67 (2008) AB158
24. Kei I., Naotaka F., Yutaka N., et al. The usefulness and safety of pancreatic guidewire placement for achieving deep cannulation of the bile duct. [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 67 (2008) AB94
25. Deviere J. Using the pancreas for common bile duct cannulation?. Endoscopy 35 (2003) 750-751
26. Gonzalez Lama Y., Abreu L., Calleja J.L., et al. Selective biliary cannulation using pancreatic guide-wire placement: further evidence needed to support the use of an already known technique. Endoscopy 36 (2004) 457 author reply 8
27. Cotton P.B., Lehman G., Vennes J., et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 37 (1991) 383-393
28. Wilson E.B. Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. J Am Stat Assoc 22 (1927) 209-212
29. Cheng C.L., Sherman S., Watkins J.L., et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 101 (2006) 139-147
30. Katsinelos P., Paroutoglou G., Kountouras J., et al. A comparative study of standard ERCP catheter and hydrophilic guide wire in the selective cannulation of the common bile duct. Endoscopy 40 (2008) 302-307
31. Doppl W.E., Weber H.P., Temme H., et al. Evaluation of ERCP- and endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatic damage: a prospective study on the time course and the significance of serum levels of pancreatic secretory enzymes. Eur J Med Res 1 (1996) 303-311
32. Panteghini M., Pagani F., Alebardi O., et al. Time course of changes in pancreatic enzymes, isoenzymes and, isoforms in serum after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Clin Chem 37 (1991) 1602-1605
33. Cheon Y.K., Cho K.B., Watkins J.L., et al. Frequency and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis correlated with extent of pancreatic ductal opacification. Gastrointest Endosc 65 (2007) 385-393
34. Artifon E.L., Sakai P., Cunha J.E., et al. Guidewire cannulation reduces risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and facilitates bile duct cannulation. Am J Gastroenterol 102 (2007) 2147-2153
35. Karamanolis G., Katsikani A., Viazis N., et al. A prospective cross-over study using a sphincterotome and a guidewire to increase the success rate of common bile duct cannulation. World J Gastroenterol 11 (2005) 1649-1652
36. Lella F., Bagnolo F., Colombo E., et al. A simple way of avoiding post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 59 (2004) 830-834
37. Freeman M.L., and Guda N.M. ERCP cannulation: a review of reported techniques. Gastrointest Endosc 61 (2005) 112-125
38. Maydeo A., and Borkar D. Techniques of selective cannulation and sphincterotomy. Endoscopy 35 (2003) S19-S23