Exploring the time course of face matching: Temporal constraints impair unfamiliar face identification under temporally unconstrained viewing

Vision Research

Volumn 51, Issue 19, 2011, Pages 2145-2155

  Özbek, Müge ^a,c   Bindemann, Markus ^b,c  

^a BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Eye movements; Face perception; Time course; Unfamiliar faces

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; EYE TRACKING; FACE; FACE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; EYE MOVEMENTS; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80053102508     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: 18785646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.08.009     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Althoff R.R., Cohen N.J. Eye-movement-based memory effect: A reprocessing effect in face perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1999, 25:997-1010.
2. Barton J.J., Radcliffe N., Cherkasova M.V., Edelman J., Intriligator J.M. Information processing during face recognition: The effects of familiarity, inversion, and morphing on scanning fixations. Perception 2006, 35:1089-1105.
3. Bindemann M. Scene and screen center bias early eye movements in scene viewing. Vision Research 2010, 50:2577-2587.
4. Bindemann M., Avetisyan M., Blackwell K. Finding needles in haystacks: Identity mismatch frequency and facial identity verification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2010, 16:378-386.
5. Bindemann M., Sandford A. Me, myself, and I: Different recognition rates for three photo-IDs of the same person. Perception 2011, 40:625-627.
6. Bindemann M., Scheepers C., Burton A.M. Viewpoint and center of gravity affect eye movements to human faces. Journal of Vision 2009, 9(2):1-16. (article no. 17).
7. Blais C., Jack R.E., Scheepers C., Fiset D., Caldara R. Culture shapes how we look at faces. PLoS ONE 2008, 3(8):e3022.
8. Bruce V. Changing faces: Visual and non-visual coding processes in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology 1982, 73:105-116.
9. Burton A.M., White D., McNeill A. The Glasgow face matching test. Behavior Research Methods 2010, 42:286-291.
10. Butler S.H., Harvey M. Effects of aging and exposure duration on perceptual biases in chimeric face processing. Cortex 2008, 6:665-672.
11. Coolican J., Eskes G.A., McMullen P.A., Lecky E. Perceptual biases in processing facial identity and emotion. Brain and Cognition 2008, 66:176-187.
12. Davies G., Griffiths L. Eyewitness identification and the English courts: A century of trial and error. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law 2008, 15:435-449.
13. Duchaine B.C., Nakayama K. Developmental prosopagnosia and the Benton facial recognition test. Neurology 2004, 62:1219-1220.
14. Duchaine B.C., Weidenfeld A. An evaluation of two commonly used tests of unfamiliar face recognition. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:713-720.
15. Ellis H.D., Young A.W., Koenken G. Covert face recognition without prosopagnosia. Behavioural Neurology 1993, 6:27-32.
16. Farah M.J., Wilson K.D., Drain M., Tanaka J.N. What is " special" about face perception?. Psychological Review 1998, 105:482-498.
17. Haith M.M., Bergman T., Moore M.J. Eye contact and face scanning in early infancy. Science 1977, 198:853-855.
18. Hallett P.E. Eye movements. Handbook of perception and human performance: Sensory processes and perception 1986, Vol. I:10-102. Wiley, New York.
19. Henderson J.M. Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7:498-504.
20. Henderson J.M. Regarding scenes. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2007, 16:219-222.
21. Henderson J.M., Williams C.C., Falk R.J. Eye movements are functional during face learning. Memory and Cognition 2005, 33:98-106.
22. Hsiao J.H., Cottrell G. Two fixations suffice in face recognition. Psychological Science 2008, 19:998-1006.
23. Janik S.W., Wellens A.R., Goldberg M.L., Dell'Osso L.F. Eyes as the center of focus in the visual examination of human faces. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1978, 47:857-858.
24. Johnston R.A., Hill H., Carman N. Recognizing faces: Effects of lighting direction, inversion, and brightness reversal. Perception 1992, 21:365-375.
25. Kemp R., Towell N., Pike G. When seeing should not be believing: Photographs, credit cards and fraud. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1997, 11:211-222.
26. Logie R.H., Baddeley A.D., Woodhead M.M. Face recognition, pose and ecological validity. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1987, 1:53-69.
27. Longmore C.A., Liu C.H., Young A.W. Learning faces from photographs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:77-100.
28. Maurer D., Le Grand R., Mondloch C.J. The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Science 2002, 6:255-260.
29. Megreya A.M., Bindemann M., Havard C. Sex differences in unfamiliar face identification: Evidence from matching tasks. Acta Psychologica 2011, 137:83-89.
30. Megreya A.M., Havard C. Left face matching bias: Right hemisphere dominance or scanning habits. Laterality 2011, 26:75-92.
31. Meinhardt-Injac B., Persike M., Meinhardt G. The time course of face matching by internal and external features: Effects of context and inversion. Vision Research 2010, 50:1598-1611.
32. Morrison D.J., Bruce V., Burton A.M. Covert face recognition in neurologically intact patients. Psychological Research 2000, 63:83-94.
33. Rayner K., Pollatsek A. The psychology of reading 1989, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
34. Scheck B., Neufeld P., Dwyer J. Actual innocence 2000, Random House, New York.
35. Sergent J., Bindra D. Differential hemispheric processing of faces: Methodological considerations and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin 1981, 89:541-554.
36. Simons D.J., Levin D.T. Failure to detect changes to people in real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1998, 5:644-649.
37. Tatler B.W. The central fixation bias in scene viewing: Selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions. Journal of Vision 2007, 7(14):1-17. (article no. 4).
38. Van Belle G., De Graef P., Verfaillie K., Busigny T., Rossion B. Whole not hole: Expert face recognition requires holistic face perception. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:2620-2629.
39. Veres-Injac B., Schwaninger A. The time course of processing external and internal features of unfamiliar faces. Psychological Research 2009, 73:43-53.
40. Vinette C., Gosselin F., Schyns P.G. Spatio-temporal dynamics of face recognition in a flash: It's in the eyes. Cognitive Science 2004, 28:289-301.
41. Wells G.L., Memon A., Penrod S.D. Eyewitness evidence: Improving its probative value. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2006, 7:45-75.
42. Young A.W., Hellawell D., de Haan E.H.F. Cross-domain semantic priming in normal subjects and a prosopagnosic patient. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1988, 40A:561-580.
43. Young A.W., Hellawell D., Hay D.C. Configurational information in face perception. Perception 1987, 16:747-759.
44. Yovel G., Tambini A., Brandman T. The asymmetry of the fusiform face area is a stable individual characteristic that underlies the left-visual-field superiority for faces. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:3061-3068.