Judgment of the humanness of an interlocutor is in the eye of the beholder

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 9, 2011, Pages

  Lortie, Catherine L ^a,b   Guitton, Matthieu J ^a,b  

^a CENTRE DE RECHERCHE DE L INSTITUT UNIVERSITAIRE EN SANTÉ MENTALE DE QUÉBEC   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH; EMOTION; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; LINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS; SOCIAL INTERACTION; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; ROBOTICS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COGNITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EMOTIONS; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; ROBOTICS;

EID: 80053063161     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025085     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Dautenhahn K, (2007) Socially intelligent robots: Dimensions of human-robot interaction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 362: 679-704.
2. Holtgraves TM, Ross SJ, Weywadt CR, Han TL, (2007) Perceiving artificial social agents. Comput Human Behav 23: 2163-2174.
3. Dautenhahn K, Ogden B, Quick T, (2002) From embodied to socially embedded agents: Implications for interaction-aware robots. Cogn Syst Res 3: 397-428.
4. French RM, (2000) The Turing test: The first 50 years. Trends Cogn Sci 4: 115-122.
5. Lee EJ, (2010) The more humanlike, the better? How speech type and users' cognitive style affect social responses to computers. Comput Human Behav 26: 665-672.
6. Turing AM, (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59: 433-460.
7. von der Pütten AM, Krämer NC, Gratch J, Kang SH, (2010) "It doesn't matter what you are!" Explaining social effects of agents and avatars. Comput Human Behav 26: 1641-1650.
8. Giard F, Guitton MJ, (2010) Beauty or realism: The dimensions of skin from cognitive sciences to computer graphics. Comput Human Behav 26: 1748-1752.
9. Ku J, Jang HJ, Kim KU, Kim JH, Park SH, et al. (2005) Experimental results of affective valence and arousal to avatar's facial expressions. CyberPsychol Behav 8: 493-503.
10. Alissandrakis A, Nehaniv CL, Dautenhahn K, (2004) Towards robot cultures?: Learning to imitate in a robotic arm test-bed with dissimilar embodied agents. Interact Stud 5: 3-44.
11. Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Dubowski J, (2006) Does appearance matter in the interaction of children with autism with a humanoid robot? Interact Stud 7: 509-542.
12. Bailenson JN, Yee N, (2005) Digital chameleons: Automatic assimilation of nonverbal gestures in immersive virtual environments. Psychol Sci 16: 814-819.
13. Whalen TE, Petriu DC, Yang L, Petriu EM, Cordea MD, (2003) Capturing behavior for the use of avatars in virtual environments. CyberPsychol Behav 6: 537-544.
14. Nass C, Moon Y, Green N, (1997) Are machines gender neutral? Gender-stereotypic responses to computers with voices. J Appl Soc Psychol 27: 864-876.
15. Suzuki N, Takeuchi Y, Ishii K, Okada M, (2003) Effects of echoic mimicry using hummed sounds on human-computer interaction. Speech Comm 40: 559-573.
16. Korukonda AR, (2003) Taking stock of Turing test: A review, analysis, and appraisal of issues surrounding thinking machines. Int J Hum Comput Stud 58: 240-257.
17. Mayer RE, Johnson WL, Shaw E, Sandhu S, (2006) Constructing computer-based tutors that are socially sensitive: Politeness in educational software. Int J Hum Comput Stud 64: 36-42.
18. Tinwell A, Grimshaw M, Williams A, (2011) Uncanny speech. In: Grimshaw M, editors. Game sound technology and player interaction: Concepts and developments Hershey, PA IGI Global pp. 213-234.
19. Weizenbaum J, (1966) Eliza - A computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Comm ACM 9: 36-45.
20. Pennebaker JW, Chung CK, Ireland M, Gonzales A, Booth RJ, (2007) The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007 Austin, TX LIWC.net.
21. Kahn JH, Tobin RM, Massey AE, Anderson JA, (2007) Measuring emotional expression with the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Am J Psychol 120: 263-286.
22. Tausczik YR, Pennebaker JW, (2010) The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. J Lang Soc Psychol 29: 24-54.
23. Dino A, Reysen S, Branscombe NR, (2009) Online interactions between group members who differ in status. J Lang Soc Psychol 28: 85-93.
24. Pfeil U, Arjan R, Zaphiris P, (2009) Age differences in online social networking: A study of user profiles and the social capital divide among teenagers and older users in MySpace. Comput Human Behav 25: 643-654.
25. Mori M, (1970) Bukimi no tani [The uncanny valley]. Energy 7: 33-35.
26. MacDorman KF, Ishiguro H, (2006) The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research. Interact Stud 7: 297-337.
27. Rollman JB, Krug K, Parente F, (2000) The chat room phenomenon: Reciprocal communication in cyberspace. CyberPsychol Behav 3: 161-166.
28. Vignovic JA, Thompson LF, (2010) Computer-mediated cross-cultural collaboration: Attributing communication errors to the person versus the situation. J Appl Psychol 95: 265-276.
29. Walther JB, (2007) Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Comput Human Behav 23: 2538-2557.
30. Barak A, Gluck-Ofri O, (2007) Degree and reciprocity of self-disclosure in online forums. CyberPsychol Behav 10: 407-417.
31. Bradac JJ, Courtright JA, Bowers JW, (1980) Effects of intensity, immediacy and diversity upon receiver attitudes toward a belief-discrepant message and its source. In: Giles H, Robinson WP, Smith P, editors. Language: Social psychological perspectives Oxford Pergamon pp. 217-221.
32. Jessmer S, Anderson D, (2001) The effect of politeness and grammar on user perceptions of electronic mail. North Am J Psychol 3: 331-346.
33. Kreiner DS, Schnakenberg SD, Green AG, Costello MJ, McClin AF, (2002) Effects of spelling errors on the perception of writers. J Gen Psychol 129: 5-17.
34. Lea M, Spears R, (1992) Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. J Organizational Computi 2: 321-342.
35. Ardissono L, Boella G, Lesmo L, (2000) Plan based agent architecture for interpreting natural language dialogue. Int J Human Comput Stud 52: 583-636.
36. Provine R, (1992) Contagious Laughter: Laughter is sufficient stimulus for laughs and smiles. Bull Psychon Soc 30: 1-4.
37. Cappella JN, Panalp S, (1981) Talk and silence sequences in informal conversations: III Interspeaker influence. Human Comm Res 7: 117-132.
38. Giles H, (1973) Communicative effectiveness as a function of accented speech. Speech Monogr 40: 330-331.
39. Levelt WJM, Kelter S, (1982) Surface form and memory in question answering. Cogn Psychol 14: 78-106.
40. Giles H, Coupland J, Coupland N, (1991) Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In: Giles H, Coupland J, Coupland N, editors. Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics Cambridge Cambridge University Press pp. 1-68.
41. Antheunis ML, Valkenburg PM, Peter J, (2007) Computer-mediated communication and interpersonal attraction: An experimental test of two explanatory hypotheses. CyberPsychol Behav 10: 831-835.