Effects of echoic mimicry using hummed sounds on human-computer interaction

Speech Communication

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 559-573

  Suzuki, Noriko ^a,b   Takeuchi, Yugo ^a,c   Ishii, Kazuo ^d   Okada, Michio ^a  

^a ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL   (Japan)

^b NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c SHIZUOKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d SONY CORPORATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

Echoic mimicry; Human computer interaction; Hummed sounds; Interpersonal relations; Psychological evaluation

Indexed keywords

ANIMATION; PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH COMMUNICATION;

ECHOIC MIMICRY;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 0038527366     PISSN: 01676393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00180-2     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Beskow, J., Elenius, K., McGlashan, S., 1997. Olga - a dialogue system with an animated talking agent. In: Eurospeech97. pp. 1651-1654.
2. Cassel J., Thrisson K.R. The power of a nod and a glance: envelope vs. emotional feedback in animated conversational agents. J. Appl. Artif. Intell. 13:1999;519-538.
3. Cassel, J., Stone, M., Douville, B., Prevost, S., Achorn, B., Steedman, M., Badler, N., Pelachaud, C., 1994. Modeling the interaction between speech and gesture. In: 16th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. pp. 153-158.
4. Chafe W.L. Linking intonation units in spoken english. Haiman J., Thompson S.A. Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse. 1988;1-27 Benjamins.
5. Couper-Kuhlen E. The prosody of repetition: on quoting and mimicry. Couper-Kuhlen E., Selting M. Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies. 1996;366-405 Cambridge University Press.
6. Dennett D.C. The Intentional Stance. 1987;MIT Press.
7. Fujita, F., Kageyama, K., 1997. An open architecture for robot entertainment. In: Proc. Autonomous Agents, pp. 435-442.
8. Masataka N. Pitch characteristics of Japanese maternal speech to infants. J. Child Lang. 19:1992;213-223.
9. Nakata, T., Sato, T., Mori, T., 1998. Expression of emotion and intention by robot body movement. In: Intelligent Autonomous Systems, 5, pp. 352-359.
10. Nass C., Steuer J., Henriksen L., Dryer D.C. Machines, social attributions, and ethopoeia: performance assessments of computers subsequent to "self-" or "other-" evaluations. J. Human-Computer Studies. 40:1994;543-559.
11. Shimojima, A., Koiso, H., Swerts, M., Katagiri, Y., 1998. An informational analysis of echoic responses in dialogue. In: 20th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. pp. 951-956.
12. Strommen, E., 1998. When the interface is a talking dinosaur: learning across media with actimates barney. In: CHI98. pp. 288-295.
13. Suzuki, N., Takeuchi, Y., Ishii, K., Okada, M., 1999. Evaluation of affiliation in interaction with artificial creatures. In: Eurospeech99. pp. 259-262.
14. Suzuki N., Takeuchi Y., Ishii K., Okada M. Talking eye: autonomous creatures for augmented chatting. J. Rob. Auton. Syst. 31:2000;171-184.
15. Takeuchi, Y., Katagiri, Y., Nass, C., Fogg, B.J., 1998. Social response and cultural dependency in human-computer interaction. In: Joint workshop on cross-cultural communication - towards culturally situated agents, PRICAI98. pp. 114-123.
16. Tannen D. Repetition in conversation: toward a poetics of talk. J. Lang. 63:1987;574-605.
17. Walker, M.A., 1992. Redundancy in collaborative dialogue. In: COLING-92. pp. 345-351.
18. Wertsch J.V. Voice of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. 1991;Harvard University Press.