Auditory brainstem responses predict auditory nerve fiber thresholds and frequency selectivity in hearing impaired chinchillas

Hearing Research

Volumn 280, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 236-244

  Henry, Kenneth S ^a   Kale, Sushrut ^b   Scheidt, Ryan E ^c   Heinz, Michael G ^a,b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NERVE FIBER; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY MASKING; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD SHIFT; CHINCHILLA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; HEARING LOSS; INNER EAR DISEASE; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NOISE INJURY; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TUNING CURVE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHINCHILLA; COCHLEA; COCHLEAR NERVE; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; HEARING LOSS, NOISE-INDUCED; MALE; MODELS, ANIMAL; NOISE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 80053053650     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: 18785891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Attias J., Pratt H. Auditory evoked potentials and audiological follow up of subjects developing noise induced permanent threshold shift. Audiology 1984, 23:498-508.
2. Borg E., Nilsson R., Engström B. Effect of the acoustic reflex on inner ear damage induced by industrial noise. Acta Otolaryngol. 1983, 96:361-369.
3. Buchwald J.S., Huang C.M. Far field acoustic response: origins in cat. Science 1975, 189:382-384.
4. Chintanpalli A., Heinz M.G. Effect of auditory-nerve response variability on estimates of tuning curves. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2007, 122:EL203-EL209.
5. Chung J.W., Ahn J.H., Kim J.Y., Lee H.J., Kang H.H., Lee Y.K., Kim J.U., Koo S.W. The effect of isoflurane, halothane and pentobarbital on noise-induced hearing loss in mice. Anesth. Analg. 2007, 104:1404-1408.
6. Church M.W., Gritzke R. Effects of ketamine anesthesia on the rat brain-stem auditory evoked potential as a function of dos and stimulus intensity. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1987, 67:570-583.
7. Cody A.R., Johnstone B.M. Acoustic trauma: single neuron basis for the half-octave shift. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1981, 70:707-711.
8. Cody A.R., Robertson D. Variability of noise-induced damage in the guinea-pig cochlea: electro-physiological and morphological correlates after strictly controlled exposures. Hear. Res. 1983, 9:55-70.
9. Cook R.O., Konishi T., Salt A.N., Hamm C.W., Lebetkin E.H., Koo J. Brainstem-evoked responses of guinea-pigs exposed to high noise-levels in utero. Dev. Psychobiol. 1982, 15:95-104.
10. Crumling M.A., Saunders J.C. Tonotopic distribution of short-term adaptation properties in the cochlear nerve of normal and acoustically overexposed chicks. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2007, 8:54-68.
11. Dallos P., Harris D. Properties of auditory-nerve responses in absence of outer hair cells. J. Neurophysiol. 1978, 41:365-383.
12. de Boer E. Mechanics of the cochlea: modeling efforts. The Cochlea 1996, 258-317. Springer, New York. P. Dallos, A.N. Popper, R.R. Fay (Eds.).
13. Don M., Ponton C.W., Eggermont J.J., Kwong B. The effects of sensory hearing loss on cochlear filter times estimated from auditory brainstem response latencies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1998, 104:2280-2289.
14. Doyle W.J., Fria T.J. The effects of hypothermia on the latencies of the auditory brain-stem response (ABR) in the rhesus monkey. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol 1985, 60:258-266.
15. Goldstein J.L., Baer T., Kiang N.Y.S. A theoretical treatment of latency, group delay, and tuning characteristics for auditory-nerve responses to clicks and tones. Physiology of the Auditory System 1971, 133-141. National Education Consultants, Baltimore, MD. M.B. Sachs (Ed.).
16. Gorga M.P., Worthington D.W., Reiland J.K., Beauchaine K.A., Goldgar D.E. Some comparisons between auditory brain stem response thresholds, latencies, and the pure-tone audiogram. Ear Hear. 1985, 6:105-112.
17. Gourevitch B., Doisy T., Avillac M., Edeline J. Follow-up of latency and threshold shifts of auditory brainstem responses after single and interrupted acoustic trauma in guinea pig. Brain Res. 2009, 1304:66-79.
18. Harding G.W., Bohne B.A., Ahmad M. DPOAE level shifts and ABR threshold shifts compared to detailed analysis of histopathological damage from noise. Hear. Res. 2002, 174:158-171.
19. Heinz M.G., Issa J.B., Young E.D. Auditory-nerve rate responses are inconsistent with common hypotheses for the neural correlates of loudness recruitment. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2005, 6:91-105.
20. Heinz M.G., Swaminathan J., Boley J.D., Kale S. Across-fiber coding of temporal fine-structure: effects of noise-induced hearing loss on auditory-nerve fibers. The Neurophysiological Bases of Auditory Perception 2010, 621-630. Springer, New York. E.A. Lopez-Poveda, A.R. Palmer, R. Meddis (Eds.).
21. Henry K.S., Lucas J.R. Auditory sensitivity and the frequency selectivity of auditory filters in the Carolina chickadee (Poecile carolinensis). Anim. Behav. 2010, 80:497-507.
22. Hofstetter P., Ding D., Powers N., Salvi R.J. Quantitative relationship of carboplatin dose to magnitude of inner and outer hair cell loss and the reduction in distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitude in chinchillas. Hear. Res. 1997, 112:199-215.
23. Kale S., Heinz M.G. Envelope coding in auditory-nerve fibers following noise-induced hearing loss. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2010, 11:657-673.
24. Kujawa S.G., Liberman M.C. Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after temporary noise-induced hearing loss. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:14077-14085.
25. Liberman M.C. Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. I. Threshold shift and characteristic-frequency shift. Hear. Res. 1984, 16:33-41.
26. Liberman M.C., Dodds L.W. Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves. Hear. Res. 1984, 16:55-74.
27. Littell R.C., Milliken G.A., Stroup W.W., Wolfinger R.D., Schabenberger O. SAS for Mixed Models 2006, SAS Publishing, Cary, NC. Second ed.
28. Maison S.F., Liberman M.C. Predicting vulnerability to acoustic injury with a noninvasive assay of olivocochlear reflex strength. J. Neurosci. 2000, 20:4701-4707.
29. Moore B.C.J., Huss M., Vickers D.A., Glasberg B.R., Alcantara J.I. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Br. J. Audiol. 2000, 34:205-224.
30. Ngan E.M., May B.J. Relationship between the auditory brainstem response and auditory nerve thresholds in cats with hearing loss. Hear. Res. 2001, 156:44-52.
31. Nordmann A.S., Bohne B.A., Harding B.W. Histopathological differences between temporary and permanent threshold shift. Hear. Res. 2000, 139:13-30.
32. Nousak J.K., Stapells D.R. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses to 1 kHz tones in noise-masked normally-hearing and sensorineurally hearing-impaired adults. Int. J. Audiol. 2005, 44:331-344.
33. Ruggero M.A. Cochlear delays and traveling waves: comments on experimental look at cochlear mechanics. Audiology 1994, 33:131-142.
34. Salvi R.J., Henderson D., Hamernik R.P. Single auditory-nerve fiber and action potential latencies in normal and noise-treated chinchillas. Hear. Res. 1979, 1:237-251.
35. Scheidt R.E., Kale S., Heinz M.G. Noise-induced hearing loss alters the temporal dynamics of auditory-nerve responses. Hear. Res. 2010, 269:23-33.
36. Shera C.A., Tubis A., Talmadge C.L. Testing coherent reflection in chinchilla: auditory-nerve responses predict stimulus-frequency emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2008, 124:381-395.
37. Shera C.A., Guinan J.J., Oxenham A.J. Otoacoustic estimation of cochlear tuning: validation in the chinchilla. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2010, 11:343-365.
38. Strelcyk O., Christoforidis D., Dau T. Relation between derived-band auditory brainstem response latencies and behavioral frequency selectivity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2009, 126:1878-1888.
39. Thomson G.C., Stach B.A., Jerger J.F. Effect of ketamine on the stapedius reflex in the squirrel monkey. Arch. Otolaryngol. 1984, 110:22-24.
40. Trautwein P., Hofstetter P., Wang J., Salvi R., Nostrant A. Selective inner hair cell loss does not alter distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 1996, 86:71-82.
41. Wang C.Y., Dallos P. Latency of whole-nerve action potentials: influence of hair-cell normalcy. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1972, 52:1678-1686.
42. Wang J., Powers N.L., Hofstetter P., Trautwein P., Ding D., Salvi R. Effects of selective inner hair cell loss on auditory nerve fiber threshold, tuning, and spontaneous and driven discharge rate. Hear. Res. 1997, 107:67-82.