Follow-up of latency and threshold shifts of auditory brainstem responses after single and interrupted acoustic trauma in guinea pig

Brain Research

Volumn 1304, Issue , 2009, Pages 66-79

  Gourévitch, Boris ^a   Doisy, Thibaut ^a   Avillac, Marie ^a   Edeline, Jean Marc ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

ABR; Audiogram; Hearing loss; Permanent shift; Temporary shift; Toughening

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; EXPERIMENTAL GUINEA PIG; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NOISE INJURY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; AUDIOMETRY, EVOKED RESPONSE; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BRAIN STEM; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GUINEA PIGS; HEARING LOSS, NOISE-INDUCED; MALE; PRESSURE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS;

CAVIA;

EID: 71749119789     PISSN: 00068993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.09.041     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Ahroon W.A., and Hamernik R.P. Noise-induced hearing loss in the noise-toughened auditory system. Hear. Res. 129 (1999) 101-110
2. Ahroon W.A., and Hamernik R.P. The effects of interrupted noise exposures on the noise-damaged cochlea. Hear. Res. 143 (2000) 103-109
3. Attanasio G., Quaranta N., and Sallustio V. Development of resistance to noise. Scand. Audiol. Suppl. 48 (1998) 45-52
4. Attias J., and Pratt H. Auditory evoked potentials and audiological follow-up of subjects developing noise-induced permanent threshold shift. Audiology 23 (1984) 498-508
5. Banai K., Nicol T., Zecker S.G., and Kraus N. Brainstem timing: implications for cortical processing and literacy. J. Neurosci. 25 (2005) 9850-9857
6. Batra R., Kuwada S., and Maher V.L. The frequency-following response to continuous tones in humans. Hear. Res. 21 (1986) 167-177
7. Boettcher F.A. Auditory brain-stem response correlates of resistance to noise-induced hearing loss in Mongolian gerbils. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94 (1993) 3207-3214
8. Bohmer A. The Preyer reflex-an easy estimate of hearing function in guinea pigs. Acta Otolaryngol. 106 (1988) 368-372
9. Buchwald J.S., and Huang C. Far-field acoustic response: origins in the cat. Science 189 (1975) 382-384
10. Campo P., Subramaniam M., and Henderson D. The effect of 'conditioning' exposures on hearing loss from traumatic exposure. Hear. Res. 55 (1991) 195-200
11. Canlon B., Miller J., Flock A., and Borg E. Pure tone overstimulation changes the micromechanical properties of the inner hair cell stereocilia. Hear. Res. 30 (1987) 65-72
12. Canlon B., Borg E., and Flock A. Protection against noise trauma by pre-exposure to a low level acoustic stimulus. Hear. Res. 34 (1988) 197-200
13. Chen Y.S., Liu T.C., Cheng C.H., Yeh T.H., Lee S.Y., and Hsu C.J. Changes of hair cell stereocilia and threshold shift after acoustic trauma in guinea pigs: comparison between inner and outer hair cells. ORL J. Otorhinolaryngol. Relat. Spec. 65 (2003) 266-274
14. Church M.W., and Gritzke R. Effects of ketamine anesthesia on the rat brain-stem auditory evoked potential as a function of dose and stimulus intensity. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 67 (1987) 570-583
15. Clark W.W. Recent studies of temporary threshold shift (TTS) and permanent threshold shift (PTS) in animals. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90 (1991) 155-163
16. Clark W.W., and Bohne B.A. Animal model for the 4-kHz tonal dip. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 87 (1978) 1-16
17. Clark W.W., Bohne B.A., and Boettcher F.A. Effect of periodic rest on hearing loss and cochlear damage following exposure to noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82 (1987) 1253-1264
18. Cody A.R., and Robertson D. Variability of noise-induced damage in the guinea pig cochlea: electrophysiological and morphological correlates after strictly controlled exposures. Hear. Res. 9 (1983) 55-70
19. Cook R.O., Konishi T., Salt A.N., Hamm C.W., Lebetkin E.H., and Koo J. Brainstem-evoked responses of guinea pigs exposed to high noise levels in utero. Dev. Psychobiol. 15 (1982) 95-104
20. Dancer A.L., Henderson D., Salvi R.J., and Hamernik R.P. Noise-induced hearing loss (1992), Mosby Year Book, St Louis
21. Donaldson G.S., and Ruth R.A. Derived-band auditory brain-stem response estimates of traveling wave velocity in humans. II. Subjects with noise-induced hearing loss and Meniere's disease. J. Speech Hear. Res. 39 (1996) 534-545
22. Doyle W.J., and Fria T.J. The effects of hypothermia on the latencies of the auditory brain-stem response (ABR) in the rhesus monkey. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 60 (1985) 258-266
23. Edeline J.M., and Neuenschwander-el Massioui N. Retention of CS-US association learned under ketamine anesthesia. Brain Res. 457 (1988) 274-280
24. Eldred K.M., Gannon W.F., and von Gierke H. A laboratory method for the study of acoustic trauma. Laryngoscope 58 (1957) 465-477
25. Elhilali M., Fritz J.B., Klein D.J., Simon J.Z., and Shamma S.A. Dynamics of precise spike timing in primary auditory cortex. J. Neurosci. 24 (2004) 1159-1172
26. Francois I. The use of auditory brainstem responses (ABR) for the compensation of work-related hearing loss. A comparative study of the hearing deficit and the ABR latencies in function to noise exposition, age and sex; its application in the medico-legal compensation of work-related deafness. PhD Thesis (1999), Université de Dijon, France
27. Franks J.R. Number of workers exposed to occupational noise. Semin. Hear. 9 (1988) 287-297
28. Fredelius L., Rask-Andersen H., Johansson B., Urquiza R., Bagger-Sjoback D., and Wersall J. Time sequence of degeneration pattern of the organ of Corti after acoustic overstimulation. A light microscopical and electrophysiological investigation in the guinea pig. Acta Otolaryngol. 106 (1988) 81-93
29. Gorga M.P., Worthington D.W., Reiland J.K., Beauchaine K.A., and Goldgar D.E. Some comparisons between auditory brain stem response thresholds, latencies, and the pure-tone audiogram. Ear Hear. 6 (1985) 105-112
30. Goulios H., and Robertson D. Noise-induced cochlear damage assessed using electrophysiological and morphological criteria: an examination of the equal energy principle. Hear. Res. 11 (1983) 327-341
31. Hamernik R.P., and Ahroon W.A. Sound-induced priming of the chinchilla auditory system. Hear. Res. 137 (1999) 127-136
32. Hamernik R.P., Qiu W., and Davis B. Cochlear toughening, protection, and potentiation of noise-induced trauma by non-Gaussian noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113 (2003) 969-976
33. Hamernik R.P., Qiu W., and Davis B. Hearing loss from interrupted, intermittent, and time varying non-Gaussian noise exposure: the applicability of the equal energy hypothesis. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122 (2007) 2245-2254
34. Harada T., and Tokuriki M. Brain-stem auditory evoked potentials in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 104 (1997) 43-50
35. Harada T., Tokuriki M., and Tanioka Y. Age-related changes in the brainstem auditory evoked potentials of the marmoset. Hear. Res. 128 (1999) 119-124
36. Harding G.W., Bohne B.A., and Ahmad M. DPOAE level shifts and ABR threshold shifts compared to detailed analysis of histopathological damage from noise. Hear. Res. 174 (2002) 158-171
37. Heil P. Coding of temporal onset envelope in the auditory system. Speech Commun. 41 (2003) 123-134
38. Heil P. First-spike latency of auditory neurons revisited. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14 (2004) 461-467
39. Heil P., and Irvine D.R. First-spike timing of auditory-nerve fibers and comparison with auditory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 78 (1997) 2438-2454
40. Henderson D., Hamernik R.P., Salvi R.J., and Ahroon W.A. Comparison of auditory-evoked potentials and behavioral thresholds in the normal and noise-exposed chinchilla. Audiology 22 (1983) 172-180
41. Hogg R.V., and Ledolter J. Engineering statistics (1987), MacMillan
42. International Organization for Standardization (1990) Acoustics: determination of occupational noise exposure and estimation of noise-induced hearing impairment. International Standard ISO 1990-1999, Geneva.
43. Janczewski G., Kochanek K., Dawidowicz J., Dobrzynski P., and Checinski P. Evaluation of the effect of auditory fatigue on the human ear based on the measurement of brain stem auditory potentials (ABR). II. Relation of temporary auditory threshold shift and changes in the latency of wave V. Med. Pr. 39 (1988) 170-174
44. Joris P., and Yin T.C. A matter of time: internal delays in binaural processing. Trends Neurosci. 30 (2007) 70-78
45. Klug A., Khan A., Burger R.M., Bauer E.E., Hurley L.M., Yang L., Grothe B., Halvorsen M.B., and Park T.J. Latency as a function of intensity in auditory neurons: influences of central processing. Hear. Res. 148 (2000) 107-123
46. Kruskal W.H., and Wallis W.A. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 47 (1952) 583-621
47. Liberman M.C., and Dodds L.W. Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. II. Stereocilia damage and alterations of spontaneous discharge rates. Hear. Res. 16 (1984) 43-53
48. Liberman M.C., and Dodds L.W. Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves. Hear. Res. 16 (1984) 55-74
49. Maison S.F., and Liberman M.C. Predicting vulnerability to acoustic injury with a noninvasive assay of olivocochlear reflex strength. J. Neurosci. 20 (2000) 4701-4707
50. Mann H.B., and Whitney D.R. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann. Math. Stat. 18 (1947) 50-60
51. Markand O.N. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 11 (1994) 319-342
52. McFadden S.L., Henderson D., and Shen Y.H. Low-frequency 'conditioning' provides long-term protection from noise-induced threshold shifts in chinchillas. Hear. Res. 103 (1997) 142-150
53. Miller J.D. Effects of noise on people. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 56 (1974) 729-764
54. Miller J.D., Watson C.S., and Covell W.P. Deafening effects of noise on the cat. Acta. Otolaryngol. Suppl. 176 (1963) 1-91
55. Nadaraya E.A. On estimating regression. Theor. Probab. Appl. 9 (1964) 141-142
56. Neubauer H., and Heil P. Towards a unifying basis of auditory thresholds: the effects of hearing loss on temporal integration reconsidered. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 5 (2004) 436-458
57. Ngan E.M., and May B.J. Relationship between the auditory brainstem response and auditory nerve thresholds in cats with hearing loss. Hear. Res. 156 (2001) 44-52
58. Ologe F.E., Olajide T.G., Nwawolo C.C., and Oyejola B.A. Deterioration of noise-induced hearing loss among bottling factory workers. J. Laryngol. Otol. 122 (2008) 786-794
59. Picton T.W., Hillyard S.A., Krausz H.I., and Galambos R. Human auditory evoked potentials. I. Evaluation of components. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 36 (1974) 179-190
60. Picton T.W., Woods D.L., Baribeau-Braun J., and Healey T.M. Evoked potential audiometry. J. Otolaryngol. 6 (1976) 90-119
61. Pineda J.A., Holmes T.C., Swick D., and Foote S.L. Brain-stem auditory evoked potentials in squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 73 (1989) 532-543
62. Qiu W., Davis B., and Hamernik R.P. Hearing loss from interrupted, intermittent, and time varying Gaussian noise exposures: the applicability of the equal energy hypothesis. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121 (2007) 1613-1620
63. Rajan R., and Johnstone B.M. Residual effects in monaural temporary threshold shifts to pure tones. Hear. Res. 12 (1983) 185-197
64. Robertson D., and Wilson S.A. Changes in cochlear sensitivity do not alter relative thresholds of different spontaneous rate categories of primary auditory nerve fibres. Hear. Res. 51 (1991) 29-32
65. Roeser R.J., Michael Valente M., and Hosford-Dunn H. Audiology: diagnosis (2000), Thieme 616 pages
66. Rosenhamer H.J., Lindstrom B., and Lundborg T. On the use of click-evoked electric brainstem responses in audiological diagnosis. III. Latencies in cochlear hearing loss. Scand. Audiol. 10 (1981) 3-11
67. Rupa V., and Dayal A.K. Wave V latency shifts with age and sex in normals and patients with cochlear hearing loss: development of a predictive model. Br. J. Audiol. 27 (1993) 273-279
68. Ryan A.F., Bennett T.M., Woolf N.K., and Axelsson A. Protection from noise-induced hearing loss by prior exposure to a nontraumatic stimulus: role of the middle ear muscles. Hear. Res. 72 (1994) 23-28
69. Salvi R.J., Henderson D., and Hamernik R.P. Single auditory nerve fiber and action potential latencies in normal and noise-treated chinchillas. Hear. Res. 1 (1979) 237-251
70. Santarelli R., Arslan E., Carraro L., Conti G., Capello M., and Plourde G. Effects of isoflurane on the auditory brainstem responses and middle latency responses of rats. Acta Otolaryngol. 123 (2003) 176-181
71. Schmuziger N., Patscheke J., and Probst R. An assessment of threshold shifts in nonprofessional pop/rock musicians using conventional and extended high-frequency audiometry. Ear Hear. 28 (2007) 643-648
72. Simha N., Paquereau J., Cazals Y., and Aran J.M. Effects of electrolytic lesions of the superior olivary complex and trapezoid body on brainstem auditory-evoked potentials in the guinea pig. I. Vertex-tragus recordings. Audiology 27 (1988) 279-290
73. Sinex D.G., Clark W.W., and Bohne B.A. Effects of periodic rest on physiological measures of auditory sensitivity following exposure to noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82 (1987) 1265-1273
74. Sliwinska-Kowalska M., Sulkowski W., Chrzescijanek M., and Kamedula T. Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) in guinea pigs to loud tones noise: a preliminary study. Otolaryngol. Pol. 46 (1992) 409-414
75. Smith D.I., and Mills J.H. Anesthesia effects: auditory brain-stem response. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 72 (1989) 422-428
76. Sohmer H., Kinarti R., and Gafni M. The latency of auditory nerve-brainstem responses in sensorineural hearing loss. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 230 (1981) 189-199
77. Sohmer H., Freeman S., Friedman I., and Lidan D. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) latency shifts in animal models of various types of conductive and sensori-neural hearing losses. Acta Otolaryngol. 111 (1991) 206-211
78. Starr A., and Hamilton A.E. Correlation between confirmed sites of neurological lesions and abnormalities of far-field auditory brainstem responses. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 41 (1976) 595-608
79. Stieve M., Mojallal H., Winter M., Battmer R., and Lenarz T. Normative auditory brainstem response data for hearing threshold in the rabbit. Audiol. Neuro-otol. 11 (2006) 310-317
80. Subramaniam M., Campo P., and Henderson D. Development of resistance to hearing loss from high frequency noise. Hear. Res. 56 (1991) 65-68
81. Subramaniam M., Campo P., and Henderson D. The effect of exposure level on the development of progressive resistance to noise. Hear. Res. 52 (1991) 181-187
82. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1981) Noise effects handbook: a desk reference to health and welfare effects of noise.
83. van Looij M.A., Liem S.S., van der Burg H., van der Wees J., De Zeeuw C.I., and van Zanten B.G. Impact of conventional anesthesia on auditory brainstem responses in mice. Hear. Res. 193 (2004) 75-82
84. Wada S.I., and Starr A. Generation of auditory brain stem responses (ABRs). I. Effects of injection of a local anesthetic (procaine HCI) into the trapezoid body of guinea pigs and cat. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 56 (1983) 326-339
85. Wada S.I., and Starr A. Generation of auditory brain stem responses (ABRs). II. Effects of surgical section of the trapezoid body on the ABR in guinea pigs and cat. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 56 (1983) 340-351
86. Wada S.I., and Starr A. Generation of auditory brain stem responses (ABRs). III. Effects of lesions of the superior olive, lateral lemniscus and inferior colliculus on the ABR in guinea pig. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 56 (1983) 352-366
87. Wang Y., Hirose K., and Liberman M.C. Dynamics of noise-induced cellular injury and repair in the mouse cochlea. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 3 (2002) 248-268
88. Watson G.S. Smooth regression analysis. Sankhya, Ser. A. 26 (1964) 359-372
89. Wilcoxon F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biom. Bull. 1 (1945) 80-83
90. World Heath Organization (1980) Environmental Health Criteria 12, Noise WHO 1980, Geneva.
91. Yamasoba T., Dolan D.F., and Miller J.M. Acquired resistance to acoustic trauma by sound conditioning is primarily mediated by changes restricted to the cochlea, not by systemic responses. Hear. Res. 127 (1999) 31-40
92. Zuo H., Cui B., She X., and Wu M. Changes in guinea pig cochlear hair cells after sound conditioning and noise exposure. J. Occup. Health 50 (2008) 373-379