Otoacoustic estimation of cochlear tuning: Validation in the chinchilla

JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 343-365

  Shera, Christopher A ^a,b   Guinan Jr , John J ^a,b   Oxenham, Andrew J ^c  

^a MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory nerve; Basilar membrane; Cochlea; Coherent reflection; Filter theory; Frequency selectivity; Model; Otoacoustic emissions; Psychophysical masking

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CAT; CHINCHILLA; COCHLEA; COCHLEAR NERVE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GUINEA PIG; HEARING; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALS; CATS; CHINCHILLA; COCHLEA; GUINEA PIGS; HUMANS; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS;

EID: 77957193260     PISSN: 15253961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10162-010-0217-4     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. BANAKIS R, CHEATHAM MA, DALLOS P, SIEGEL JH (2008) Spontaneous and tone-evoked otoacoustic emissions in mice. Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abs 31: 195
2. BERGEVIN C, SHERA CA (2010) Coherent reflection without traveling waves: on the origin of long-latency otoacoustic emissions in lizards. J Acoust Soc Am 127: 2398-2409
3. BERGEVIN C, FREEMAN DM, SAUNDERS JC, SHERA CA (2008) Otoacoustic emissions in humans, birds, lizards, and frogs: evidence for multiple generation mechanisms. J Comp Physiol A 194: 665683
4. BODE H (1945) Network analysis and feedback amplifier design. Van Nostrand Reinhold, Princeton
5. BREDBERG G (1968) Cellular patterns and nerve supply of the human organ of Corti. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 236: 1-135
6. CEDOLIN L, DELGUTTE B (2005) Pitch of complex tones: rate-place and interspike interval representations in the auditoiy nerve. J Neurophysiol 94: 347-362
7. CHOI YS, LEE SY, PARHAM K, Neely ST, Kim DO (2008) Stimulusfrequency otoacoustic emission: measurements in humans and simulations with an active cochlear model. J Acoust Soc Am 123: 2651-2669
8. CLEVELAND WS (1993) Visualizing data. Hobart, Summit, NJ
9. COOPER NP, RHODE WS (1997) Apical cochlear mechanics: a review of recent observations. In: Palmer AR, Rees A, Summefield AQ, Meddis R (eds) Psychophysical and physiological advances in hearing, Whurr, London, pp 11-17
10. DREISBACH LE, SIEGEL JH, CHEN W (1998) Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions measured at low and high frequencies in untrained human subjects. Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abs 21: 349
11. ECGERMONT JJ (1993) Wiener and Volterra analyses applied to the auditoiy system. Hear Res 66: 177-201
12. ENGSTRÖM. H, ADES HW, ANDERSSON A (1966) Structural pattern of the organ of Corti. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore
13. EVANS EF, WILSON JP (1973) Frequency selectivity in the cochlea. In: Møller AR, Boston P (eds) Basic mechanisms in hearing. Academic, New York, pp 519-551
14. GARBES PAZ (1994) Evaluating human neural tuning curves from a mechanical model of the cochlea by relating them to psychophysical, masking data. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
15. GEISLER CD, SANG C (1995) A cochlear model using feed-forward outer-hair-cell forces, Hear Res 86: 132-146
16. GHAFFARI R, ARANYOSI AJ, FREEMAN DM (2007) Longitudinally propagating traveling waves of the mammalian tectorial membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 16,510-16,515
17. GHAFFARI R, ARANYOSI AJ, RICHARDSON GP, FREEMAN DM (2009) Wave upon, wave: balancing sensitivity and frequency selectivity of hearing, submitted
18. GLASBERG BR, MOORE BCJ (1990) Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res 47: 103-138
19. GLASBERG BR, MOORE BCJ (2000) Frequency selectivity as a function of level, and frequency measured with uniformly exciting notched noise. J Acoust Soc Am 108: 2318-2328
20. GLASBERG BR, MOORE BCJ, PATTERSON RD, NIMMO-SMITH I (1984) Dynamic range and asymmetry of the auditory filter. J Acoust Soc Am 76: 419-427
21. GOODMAN SS, FITZPATRICK DF, ELLISON JC, JESTEADT W, KEEFE DH (2009) High-frequency click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and behavioral thresholds in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 125: 1014-1032
22. GREENWOOD DD (1961) Critical bandwidth and the frequency coordinates of the basilar membrane. J Acoust Soc Am 33: 1344-1356
23. GREENWOOD DD (1990) A cochlear frequency-position function for several species-29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am 87: 2592-2605
24. GUINAN JJ (1986) Effect of efferent neural activity on cochlear mechanics. Scand Audiol Suppl 25: 53-62
25. GUINAN JJ, COOPER NP (2008) Medial olivocochlear efferent inhibition of basilar-membrane responses to clicks: evidence for two modes of cochlear mechanical, excitation. J Acoust Soc Am 124: 1080-1092
26. GUINAN JJ, LIN T, CHENG H (2005) Medial-olivocochlear-efferent inhibition of the first peak of auditory-nerve responses: evidence for a new motion within the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 118: 2421-2433
27. HARTMANN WM. (1997) Signals, sound, and sensation. AIP, Woodbury
28. HEFFNER RS, HEFFNER HE (1982) Hearing in the elephant (Elephas maximus): absolute sensitivity, frequency discrimination, and sound localization. J Comp Physiol Psych 96: 926-944
29. HILLERY CM, NARINS PM (1984) Neurophysiological evidence for a traveling wave in the amphibian inner ear. Science 225: 1037-1039
30. HOUTGAST T (1973) Psychophysical experiments on 'tuning curves' and 'two-tone inhibition.' Acustica 29: 168-179
31. KALLURI R, SHERA CA (2007a) Comparing stimulus-frequency otoacoustic: emissions measured by compression, suppression, and spectral smoothing. J Acoust Soc Am 122: 3562-3575
32. KALLURI R, SHERA CA (2007b) Near equivalence of human clickevoked and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 121: 2097-2110
33. KARAVITAKI KD, MOUNTAIN DC (2007) Evidence for outer hair cell driven oscillatory fluid flow in the tunnel of Corti. Biophys J 92: 3284-3293
34. KUHN A, SAUNDERS JC (1980) Psychophysical tuning curves in the parakeet: a comparison, between simultaneous and forward masking procedures. J Acoust Soc Am 68: 1892-1894
35. LIBERMAN MC (1978) Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber. J Acoust Soc Am 63: 442-455
36. LIBERMAN MC (1982) The cochlear frequency map for the cat: labeling auditory-nerve fibers of known characteristic frequency. J Acoust Soc Am 72: 1441-1449
37. LIBERMAN MC, KIANG NYS (1978) Acoustic trauma in cats: cochlear pathology and auditory-nerve activity. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 358: 1-63
38. LONSBURY-MARTIN BL, MARTIN GK, PROBST R, COATS AC (1988) Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the nonhuman primate. II. Cochlear anatomy. Hear Res 33: 69-94
39. McGEE T, RYAN A, DALLOS P (1976) Psychophysical tuning curves of chinchillas. J Acoust Soc Am 60: 1146-1150
40. MEENDERINK SW, NARINS PM (2006) Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions in the Northern leopard frog, Rana pipiens pipiens: implications for inner ear mechanics. Hear Res 220: 67-75
41. MOORE BCJ (1978) Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward masking J Acoust Soc Am 63: 524-532
42. MOORE BCJ, GLASBERG BR (1981) Auditory filter shapes derived in simultaneous and forward masking. J Acoust Soc Am 70: 1003-1014
43. MOORE BCJ, GLASBERG BR, ROBERTS B (1984) Refining the measurement of psychophysical tuning curves. J Acoust Soc Am 76: 10571066
44. NEFF DL (1985) Stimulus parameters governing confusion effects in forward masking. J Acoust Soc Am 78: 1966-1976
45. NOWOTNY M, GUMMER AW (2006) Nanomechanics of the subtectorial space caused by electromechanics of cochlear outer hair cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 2120-2125
46. O'LOUGHLIN BJ, MOORE BCJ (1981) Improving psychoacoustical tuning curves. Hear Res 5: 343-346
47. OXENHAM AJ, DAU T (2001) Towards a measure of auditory-filter phase response. J Acoust Soc Am 110: 3169-3178
48. OXENHAM. AJ, SHERA CA (2003) Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 4: 541-554
49. PAPOULIS A (1962) The Fourier integral and its applications. McGraw-Hill, New York
50. PATTERSON RD (1976) Auditory filter shapes derived with, noise stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 59: 640-654
51. PATTERSON RD, NIMMD-SMITH I, WEBER DL, MILROY R (1982) The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. J Acoust Soc Am 72: 1788-1803
52. RECIO-SHNOSO A, TEMCHIN AN, VAN DIJK P, FAN YH, RUGGERO MA (2005) Wiener-kernel analysis of responses to noise of chinchilla. J Neurophysiol 93: 3615-3634
53. REN T (2002) Longitudinal pattern of basilar membrane vibration in the sensitive cochlea, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 17,101-17,106
54. RONKEN DA (1991) Spike discharge properties that are related to the characteristic frequency of single units in the frog auditory nerve. J Acoust Soc Am 90: 2428-2440
55. ROSEN SR, BAKER RJ, DARLING A (1998) Auditory filter nonlinearity at 2 kHz in normal hearing listener. J Acoust Soc Am 103: 2539-2350
56. RUGGERO MA, RICH NC (1983) Chinchilla auditory-nerve responses to low-frequency tones. J Acoust Soc Am 73: 2096-2108
57. RUGGERO MA, TEMCHIN AN (2005) Unexceptional, sharpness of frequency tuning in the human cochlea. Proc: Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 18,614-18,619
58. RUGGERO MA, TEMCHIN AN (2007) Similarity of traveling-wave delays in the hearing organs of humans and other tetrapods. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 8: 153-166
59. RUGGERO MA, RICH. NC, ROBLES L, SHIVAFUJA BG (1990) Middle-ear response in the chinchilla and its relationship to mechanics at the base of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 87: 1612-1629
60. RUSSELL IJ, LEGAN PK, LUKASHKINA VA, LUKASHKIN AN, GOODYEAR RJ, RICHARDSON GP (2007) Sharpened cochlear tuning in a mouse with a genetically modified tectorial membrane. Nat Neurosci 10: 215-223
61. SALT AN (2001) Cochlear fluids simulator vl.6h, (http;//oto.wustl, edu/cochlea/model.htm, downloaded. 1 Dec. 2005)
62. SCHAIRER KS, ELLISON JC, FITZPATRICK D, KEEFE DH (2006) Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission latency and level to investigate cochlear mechanics. J Acoust Soc Am 120: 901914
63. SERAFIN JV, MOODY DB, STEBBINS WC (1982) Frequency selectivity of the monkey's auditory system: psychophysical tuning curves. J Acoust Soc Am 71: 1513-1518
64. SHERA CA (2003) Mammalian spontaneous otoacoustic emissions are amplitude-stabilized cochlear standing waves. J Acoust Soc Am 114: 244-262
65. SHERA CA (2007) Laser amplification with a twist: traveling-wave propagation, and gain functions from throughout the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 122: 2738-2758
66. SHERA CA, GUINAN JJ (2003) Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning. J Acoust Soc Am 113: 2762-2772
67. SHERA CA, ZWEIG G (1993) Order from chaos: resolving the paradox of periodicity in evoked otoacoustic emission. In: Duifhuis H, Horst JW, van Dijk P, van Netten SM (eds) Biophysics of hair cell sensory systems. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 54-63
68. SHERA CA, GUINAN JJ, OXENHAM AJ (2002) Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 3318-3323
69. SHERA CA, TUBIS A, TALMADGE CL (2005) Coherent reflection in a two-dimensional, cochlea: short-wave versus long-wave scattering in the generation of reflection-source otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 118: 287-313
70. SHERA CA, TUBIS A, TALMADGE CL (2008) Testing coherent reflection, in chinchilla: auditory-nerve responses predict stimulus-frequency emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 124: 381-395
71. SIEGEL JH, TEMCHIN AN, RUGGERO MA (2003) Empirical estimates of the spatial origin of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions. Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abs 26: 679
72. SIEGEL JH, CERKA AJ, TEMCHIN AN, RUGGERO MA (2004) Similar twotone suppression, patterns in SFOAEs and the cochlear microphonics indicate comparable spatial summation, of underlying generators. Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abs 27: 539
73. SIEGEL JH, CERKA AJ, RECIO-SPINOSO A, TEMCHIN AN, VAN DIJK P, RUGGERO MA (2005) Delays of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions and cochlear vibrations contradict the theory of coherent reflection filtering. J Acoust Soc Am 118: 2434-2443
74. SISTO R, MOLETI A (2007) Transient evoked otoacoustic emission latency and cochlear tuning at different stimulus levels. J Acoust Soc Am 122: 2183-2190
75. SONGER JE, ROSOWSKI JJ (2007) Transmission matrix analysis of the chinchilla middle ear. J Acoust Soc Am 122: 932-942
76. STEELE CR, BAKER G, TOLOMEO J, ZETES D (1993) Electro-mechanical models of the outer hair cell. In: Duifhuis H, Horst JW, van Dijk P, van Netten SM (eds) Biophysics of hair cell sensory systems. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 207-214
77. STEVENS SS, WARSHOFSKY F (1965) Sound and hearing. Time-Life Books, New York
78. TALMADGE CL, TUBIS A, LONG GR, PISKORSKI P (1998) Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures. J Acoust Soc Am 104: 1517-1543
79. TALMADGE CL, TUBIS A, LONG GR, TONG C (2000) Modeling the combined effects of basilar .membrane nonlinearity and roughness on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission fine structure. J Acoust Soc Am 108: 2911-2932
80. TEMCHIN AN, RECIO-SPINOSO A, VAN DIJK P, RUGGERO MA (2005) Wiener kernels of chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers: verification using responses to tones, clicks, and noise and comparison, with basilar-membrane vibrations. J Neurophysiol 93: 3635-3648
81. TEMCHIN AN, RICH NC, RUGGERO MA (2008) Threshold timing curves of chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers. I. Dependence on characteristic frequency and relation, to the magnitudes of cochlear vibrations. J Neurophysiol 100: 2889-2898
82. TSUJI J, LIBERMAN MC (1997) Intracellular labeling of auditory nerve fibers in guinea pig: central and peripheral projections. J Comp Neurol 381: 188-202
83. VON BÉKÉSY G (1960) Experiments in hearing. McGraw-Hill, New York
84. WEN B, BOAHEN KA (2003) A linear cochlear model with active bidirectional coupling. Proc 25th Ann Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 3: 2013-2016
85. WRIGHT AA (1984) Dimensions of the cochlear stereocilia in man and in guinea pig. Hear Res 13: 89-98
86. ZWEIO G, SHERA CA (1995) The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 98: 2018-2047