Protection by low-dose kanamycin against noise-induced hearing loss in mice: Dependence on dosing regimen and genetic background

Hearing Research

Volumn 280, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 141-147

  Ohlemiller, Kevin K ^a   Rybak Rice, Mary E ^a   Rosen, Allyson D ^a   Montgomery, Scott C ^b   Gagnon, Patricia M ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KANAMYCIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CELL FUNCTION; CELL PROTECTION; CELL SURVIVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DOSE REDUCTION; DRUG DOSE REGIMEN; DRUG EFFICACY; EAR PROTECTION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HAIR CELL; HEARING LOSS; LOW DRUG DOSE; MOUSE; NOISE INJURY; NONHUMAN; OTOTOXICITY; PERINATAL PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

AGING; ANIMALS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; HAIR CELLS, AUDITORY; HEARING LOSS, NOISE-INDUCED; KANAMYCIN; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, INBRED CBA; MICE, INBRED STRAINS; MODELS, ANIMAL;

EID: 80053052187     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: 18785891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Bernard P.A. Freedom from ototoxicity in aminoglycoside treated neonates: a mistaken notion. Laryngoscope 1981, 91:1985-1994.
2. Canlon B., Meltser I., Johansson P.Y.T. Glucocorticoid receptors modulate auditory sensitivity to acoustic trauma. Hearing Res. 2007, 226:61-69.
3. Chance M.R., Chang J., Liu S., Gokulrangan G., Chen D.H.-C., Lindsay A., Geng R., Zheng Q.Y.K.A. Proteomics, bioinfomatics and targeted gene expression analysis reveals up-regulation of cochlin and identifies other potential biomarkers in the mouse model for deafness in usher syndrome type 1F. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010, 19:1515-1527.
4. Chen C.-S., Saunders J.C. The sensitive period for ototoxicity of kanamycin in mice: morphological evidence. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 1983, 238:217-223.
5. Chen F., Sha S.-H., Schacht J. Stress-induced changes in mitochondrial peroxiredoxin in mouse cochlear hair cells. Abstr. Assn. Res. Otolaryngol. 2008, 31:50.
6. Davis R.R., Newlander J.K., Ling X.-B., Cortopassi G.A., Kreig E.F., Erway L.C. Genetic basis for susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss in mice. Hearing Res. 2001, 155:82-90.
7. Dirnagl U., Simon R.P., Hallenbeck J.M. Ischemic tolerance and endogenous neuroprotection. TINS 2003, 26:248-254.
8. Eisen A., Fisman E.Z., Rubenfire M., Freimark D., McKechnie R., Tenenbaum A., Motro M., Adler Y. Ischemic preconditioning: nearly two decades of research. A comprehensive review. Atherosclerosis 2004, 172:201-210.
9. Erway L.C., Willott J.F. Genetic susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss. Scientific Basis of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss 1996, 56-64. Thieme, New York. A. Axelsson (Ed.).
10. Fernandez E.A., Ohlemiller K.K., Gagnon P.M., Clark W.W. Protection against noise-induced hearing loss in young CBA/J mice by low-dose kanamycin. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2010, 11:235-244.
11. Handbook of Genetically Standardized JAX Mice 1997, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor ME. R.R. Fox, B.A. Witham, L.A. Neleski (Eds.).
12. Gagnon P.M., Simmons D.D., Bao J., Lei D., Ortmann A.,J., Ohlemiller K.K. Temporal and genetic influences on protection against noise-induced hearing loss by hypoxic preconditioning in mice. Hearing Res. 2007, 226:79-91.
13. Gidday J.M. Cerebral preconditioning and ischaemic tolerance. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2006, 7:437-448.
14. Henley C.M., Rybak L.P. Ototoxicity in developing animals. Brain Res. Rev. 1995, 20:68-90.
15. Henry K.R. Influence of genotype and age on noise-induced auditory losses. Behav. Genet. 1982, 12:563-573.
16. Henry K.R. Age-related changes in sensitivity of the postpubertal ear to acoustic trauma. Hearing Res. 1982, 8:285-294.
17. Henry K.R., Chole R.A., McGinn M.D., Frush D.P. Increased ototoxicity in both young and old mice. Arch. Otolaryngol. 1981, 107:92-95.
18. Hirose K., Liberman M.C. Lateral wall histopathology and endocochlear potential in the noise-damaged mouse cochlea. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2003, 4:339-352.
19. Jiang H., Sha S., Schacht J. NF-kB pathway protects cochlear hair cells from aminoglycoside-induced ototoxicity. J. Neurosci. Res. 2005, 79:644-651.
20. Johnson K.R., Erway L.C., Cook S.A., Willott J.F., Zheng Q.Y. A major gene affecting age-related hearing loss in C57BL/6J mice. Hearing Res. 1997, 114:83-92.
21. Kujawa S.G., Liberman M.C. Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after 'temporary' noise-induced hearing loss. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:14077-14085.
22. Lehotsky J., Burda J., Danielisova V., Gottlieb M., Kaplan P., Saniova B. Ischemic tolerance: the mechanisms of neuroprotective strategy. Anatom. Rec. 2009, 292:2002-2012.
23. Li H.-S. Genetic influences on susceptibility of the auditory system to aging and environmental factors. Scand. Audiol. 1992, 36:1-39. (Suppl.).
24. Li H., Steyger P.S. Synergistic ototoxicity due to noise exposure and aminoglycoside antibiotics. Noise & Health 2009, 11:26-32.
25. Li H.S. Influence of genotype and age on acute acoustic trauma and recovery in CBA/Ca and C57BL/6J mice. Acta Oto-Laryngol 1992, 112:956-967.
26. Matsunobu T., Satoh Y., Ogawa K., Shiotani A. Heme oxygenase-1 expression in the guinea pig cochlea induced by intense noise stimulation acta. Otolaryngol 2009, 129:18-23.
27. Muller M., von Hunerbein K., Hoidis S., Smolders J.W.T. A physiological place-frequency map of the cochlea in the CBA/J mouse. Hearing Res. 2005, 202:63-73.
28. Niu X., Canlon B. Protective mechanisms of sound conditioning. Adv. Otorhinolaryngol. 2002, 59:96-105.
29. Ohlemiller K.K. Contributions of mouse models to understanding of age- and noise-related hearing loss. Brain Res. 2006, 1091:89-102.
30. Ohlemiller K.K. Recent findings and emerging questions in cochlear noise injury. Hearing Res. 2008, 245:5-17.
31. Ohlemiller K.K. Mechanisms and genes in human strial presbycusis from animal models. Brain Res. 2009, 1277:70-83.
32. Ohlemiller K.K., Gagnon P.M. Genetic dependence of cochlear cells and structures injured by noise. Hearing Res. 2007, 224:34-50.
33. Ohlemiller K.K., Wright J.S., Heidbreder A.F. Vulnerability to noise-induced hearing loss in 'middle-aged' and young adult mice: a dose-response approach in CBA, C57BL, and BALB inbred strains. Hearing Res. 2000, 149:239-247.
34. Ohlemiller K.K., Dahl A.R., Gagnon P.M. Divergent aging characteristics in CBA/J and CBA/CaJ mouse cochleae. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2010, 11:605-623.
35. Ohlemiller K.K., Rybak Rice M.E., Rellinger E.A., Ortmann A.J. Divergence of noise vulnerability in cochleae of young CBA/J and CBA/CaJ mice. Hearing Res. 2011, 272:13-20.
36. Ou H.C., Bohne B.A., Harding G.W. Noise damage in the C57BL/CBA mouse cochlea. Hearing Res. 2000, 145:111-122.
37. Peppi M., Kujawa S.G., Sewell W. A corticosteroid-responsive transcription factor, promeolytic leukemia zinc finger protein, mediates protection of the cochlea from acoustic trauma. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:735-741.
38. Pujol R. Sensitive developmental period and acoustic trauma: facts and hypotheses. Noise-induced Hearing Loss 1992, 196-203. Mosby, St. Louis. A.L. Dancer (Ed.).
39. Ran R., Xu H., Lu A., Bernaudin M., Sharp F.R. Hypoxic preconditioning in the brain. Dev. Neurosci. 2005, 27:87-92.
40. Rybak L.P. Mechanisms of cisplatin ototoxicity and progress in otoprotection. Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2007, 15:364-369.
41. Saunders J.C., Chen C.-S. Sensitive periods of susceptibility to auditory trauma in mammals. Environ. Health Persp. 1982, 44:63-66.
42. Sha S.-H., Kanicki A., Dootz G.A., Talaska A.E., Halsey K., Dolan D.F., Altschuler R.A. Age-related auditory pathology in the CBA/J mouse. Hearing Res. 2008, 243:87-94.
43. Shi X., Nuttall A.L. Expression of adhesion molecular proteins in the cochlear lateral wall of normal and PARP-1 mutant mice. Hearing Res. 2007, 224:1-14.
44. So H.-S., Kim H.J.,Y.,K., Kim E., Pae H.-O., Chung H.-T., Kim H.-J., Kwon K.-B., Lee K.-M., Lee H.-Y., Moon S.-K., Park R. Evidence that cisplatin-induced auditory damage is attenuated by downregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines via Nrf2/HO-1. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2008, 9:290-306.
45. Taleb M., Brandon C.S., Lee F.-S., Harris K.C., Dillmann W.H., Cunningham L.L. Hsp70 inhibits aminoglycoside-induced hearing loss and cochlear hair cell death. Cell Stress Chaperones 2009, 14:427-437.
46. Wang Y., Liberman M.C. Restraint stress and protection from acoustic injury in mice. Hearing Res. 2002, 165:96-102.
47. Wang Y., Hirose K., Liberman M.C. Dynamics of noise-induced cellular injury and repair in the mouse cochlea. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2002, 3:248-268.
48. Willott J.F. Aging and the Auditory System: Anatomy, Physiology, and Psychophysics Singular 1991, Publishing Group, San Diego.
49. Wu W.-J., Sha S., McLaren J.D., Kawamoto K., Raphael Y., Schacht J. Aminoglycoside ototoxicity in adult CBA, C57BL, and BALB mice and the Sprague-Dawley rat. Hearing Res. 2001, 158:165-178.
50. Yamamoto H., Omelchenko I., Shi S., Nuttall A.L. The influence of NfkB signal-transduction pathways on the murine inner ear by acoustic overstimulation. J. Neurosci. Res. 2009, 87:1832-1840.
51. Yoshida N., Liberman M.C. Sound conditioning reduces noise-induced permanent threshold shift in mice. Hearing Res. 2000, 148:213-219.
52. Yoshida N., Kristiansen A., Liberman M.C. Heat stress and protection from permanent acoustic injury in mice. J. Neurosci. 1999, 19:10116-10124.
53. Zheng Q.Y., Johnson K.H., Erway L.C. Assessment of hearing in 80 inbred strains of mice by ABR threshold analysis. Hearing Res. 1999, 130:94-107.