'Speaking' deficit into (or out of) existence: How language constrains classroom teachers' knowledge about instructing diverse learners

International Journal of Inclusive Education

Volumn 15, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 819-833

  Paugh, Patricia Cahill ^a   Dudley Marling, Curt ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

^b BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

discourse analysis; inclusion; social processes; sociocultural theory; teacher talk

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053004882     PISSN: 13603116     EISSN: 14645173     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13603110903437144     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Allington, R.L., and A. McGill-Franzen. 1989. Different programs, indifferent instruction. In Beyond separate education, ed. A. Gartner and D. Lipsky, 75-98. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
2. Anderson, G.L. 1990. Toward a critical constructionist approach to school administration: Invisibility, legitimation, and the study of non-events. Educational Administration Quarterly 26: 38-59.
3. Artiles, A., and E. Kozleski. 2007. Beyond convictions: Interrogating culture, history, and power in inclusive education. Language Arts 84: 357-64.
4. Bakhtin, M.M. 1981. The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin. Trans. C. Emerson and M. Holdquist, ed. M. Holdquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
5. Berry, R. 2006. Inclusion, power, and community: Teachers and students interpret the language of community in an inclusion classroom. American Educational Research Journal 43: 489-529.
6. Bloome, D., S. Carter, B. Christian, S. Madrid, S. Otto, N. Shuart-Faris, and M. Smith. 2008. Discourse analysis in classrooms: Approaches to language and literacy research. New York: Teachers College Press.
7. Carini, P., and M. Himley. 2000. From another angle: Children's strengths and school standards. New York: Teachers College Press.
8. Compton-Lilly, C. 2009. Exploring literacy and identity at multiple timescales: Possibilities for longitudinal qualitative research. Paper presented at the National Council of Teachers of English Research Assembly, February, in Los Angeles, CA.
9. Danforth, S. 2000. What can the field of developmental disabilities learn from Michel Foucault? Mental Retardation 38: 364-9.
10. Danforth, S., and V. Navarro. 2001. Hyper talk: Sampling the social construction of ADHD in everyday language. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 32: 167-90.
11. Delpit, L. 2003. Educators as 'seed people' growing a new future. Educational Researcher 32: 14-21.
12. Dyson, A.H., and L. Labbo. 2003. Popular literacies and the 'All' children: Rethinking literacy development for contemporary childhood. Language Arts 81: 100-9.
13. Escamilla, K., and S. Hopewell. 2007. The role of code switching in the written expression of early elementary simultaneous bilinguals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, in Chicago, IL.
14. Fairclough, N. 2001. Language and power. 2nd ed. London: Longman.
15. Garcia, O. 2001. Learning to notice LOTE-speaking students in classrooms: Transforming the preparation of teachers for English Language Learners. Paper presented at the first annual conference on Teaching English Language Learners, June, at Brown University. Retrieved October 5, 2009, from http:www.alliance. brown.edu/tdl/conf2001/Garcia-key-IntRev.shtml (accessed March 29, 2010).
16. Gee, J.P. 1996. Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. 2nd ed. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
17. Gee, J.P. 2004. Discourse analysis: What makes it critical? In Critical discourse analysis in education, ed. R. Rogers, 19-50.
18. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Graham, L., and R. Slee. 2008. An illusory interiority: Interrogating the discourse/s of inclusion. Educational Philosophy and Theory 40: 277-93.
19. Greenleaf, C., G. Hull, and B. Reilly. 1994. Learning from our diverse students: Helping teachers rethink problematic teaching and learning situations. Teaching and Teacher Education 10: 521-41.
20. Halliday, M., and C. Mathiessen. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar. 3rd ed. London: Arnold.
21. Klingner, J., and B. Harry. 2006. The special education referral and decision-making process for English language learners: Child study team meetings and placement conferences. Teachers College Record 108: 2247-81.
22. Marsh, M. 2002. Examining the discourses that shape our teacher identities. Curriculum Inquiry 32: 453-69.
23. Martin, J.R. 2000. Close reading: Functional linguistics as a tool for critical discourse analysis. In Researching language in schools and communities: Functional linguistics perspective, ed. L. Unsworth, 275-303. London: Cassell.
24. Miller, L. 1993. What we call smart: A new narrative for intelligence and learning. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing.
25. Oakes, J. 2005. Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26. Paugh, P. 2002. Collaborative conversations: A systematic inquiry into students who struggle in school. Unpublished diss., Boston College.
27. Waterhouse, S. 2004. Deviant and non-deviant identities in the classroom: Patrolling the boundaries of the normal social world. European Journal of Special Needs Education 19: 69-84.
28. Young, L., and B. Fitzgerald. 2006. The power of language: How discourse influences society. London: Equinox.