Self-naming practices on the internet: Identity, authenticity, and community

Cultural Studies - Critical Methodologies

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 224-235

  Gatson, Sarah N ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Identity; Online ethnography; Self

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052987891     PISSN: 15327086     EISSN: 1552356X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1532708611409531     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Baumle, A. K. (2009). Sex discrimination and law firm culture on the internet: Lawyers at the information age watercooloer. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
2. Baym, N. (1995a). The emergence of community in CMC. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), CyberSociety: Computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 35-68). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
3. Baym, N. (2000). Tune in, log on: Soaps, fandom, and online community. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
4. Bennis, W., and Slater, P. (1968). The Temporary Society. New York: Harper Collins.
5. Blumer, H. (1998). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method (3rd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
6. Boellstorff, T. (2008). Coming of age in Second Life: An anthropologist explores the virtually human. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
7. Boyd, D (2008). Taken out of context: American teen sociality in networked publics (PhD Dissertation). University of California Berkeley, CA.
8. Broad, K. L., & Joos, K. (2004). Online inquiry of public selves: Methodological considerations. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 923-946.
9. Buchannan, T., & Smith, J. L. (1999). Research on the internet: Validation of a World-Wide Web Mediated Personality Scale. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 565-571.
10. Burke, P. J. (2004). Identities and social structure: The 2003 Cooley-Mead Award Address. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 5-15.
11. Busher, H., & James, N. (2007). Email communication as a technology of oppression: Attenuating identity in online research. Annual Conference of the British Sociological Association, University of London. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2381/439
12. Davis, J. L. (2008). Presentation of self and the personal interactive homepage: An enthnography of MySpace (Thesis). College Station: Texas A&M University.
13. Davis, J. L. (2010). Architecture of the personal interactive homepage: Constructing the self through MySpace. New Media and Society. doi:10.1177/1461444809354212. Retrieved from http://nms.sagepub.com/content/ early/recent.
14. De Saille, S. (2006). A cyberian in the multiverse: Towards a feminist subject position for cyberspace. Conference Proceedings-Thinking Gender-the NEXT Generation: UK Postgraduate Conference in Gender Studies (e-paper no. 19). University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. Retrieved 23, 2006, from http://www.gender- studies.leeds.ac.uk/assets/files/epapers/epaper19-stevie-de-saille.pdf
15. Early, F. H. (2001). Staking her claim: Buffy the vampire slayer as transgressive woman warrior. Journal of Popular Culture, 35(3), 11-28.
16. Early, F. H., & Kennedy K. (Eds.). (2001). Athena's daughters: Television's new women warriors. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
17. Ellison, R. (1952). Invisible man. New York, NY: Random House.
18. Ess, C., & The Association of Internet Researchers ethics working committee. (2002). Ethical decision-making and Internet research. Retrieved from http://aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf
19. Fanon, F. (1968). Black skin, white masks. (Trans. C. Farrington). New York, NY: Grove.
20. Feagin, J. R. (2006). Systemic racism: A theory of oppression. New York, NY: Routledge.
21. Foner, L. N. (2001). Cryptography and the politics of one's true name. In J. Frenkel (Ed.), "True names" and the opening of the cyberspace frontier (pp. 143-170). New York, NY: Tom Doherty.
22. Frankenberg, R. (1993). White women, race matters: The social construction of whiteness. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
23. Gatson, S. N. (2003). On being amorphous: Autoethnography, genealogy, and a multiracial identity. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(1):20-48.
24. Gatson, S. N. (2007). Assessing the likelihood of internet informationseeking leading to offline drug use by youth. In E. Murguia, M. Tackett-Gibson, & A. Lessem (Eds.), Real drugs in a virtual world: Drug discourse and community online (pp. 99-120). Lanham, MD: Lexington.
25. Gatson, S. N., & Zweerink, A. (2000). Choosing community: Rejecting anonymity in cyberspace. Research in Community Sociology, 10, 105-137.
26. Gatson, S. N., & Zweerink, A. (2004a). "Natives" practising and inscribing community: Ethnography online. Qualitative Research, 4, 179-200.
27. Gatson, S. N., & Zweerink, A. (2004b). Interpersonal culture on the internet: Television, the internet, and the making of a community. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen.
28. Gergen, K. J. (1968). Personal Consistency and the presentation of self. In C. Gordon and K. J. Gergen (eds.), The Self in Social Interaction (299-308). New York: John Wiley.
29. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday.
30. Goodsell, T. L., & Williamson, O. (2008). The case of the brick huggers: The practice of an online community. City and Community, 7, 251-271.
31. Hall, M. (2007, October 30). Want to understand your teen? Look online. Social networking pages offer a window into their world. USA Today, p. 11A.
32. Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London, UK: SAGE.
33. Howard, P. N. (2002). Network ethnography and the hypermedia organization: New organizations, new media, new methods. New Media & Society, 4, 550-574.
34. James, N., & Busher, H. (2006). Credibility, authenticity and voice: Dilemmas in online interviewing. Qualitative Research, 6, 403-420.
35. James, N., & Busher, H. (2007). Ethical issues in online educational research: Protecting privacy, establishing authenticity in email interviewing. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 30(1):101-113.
36. Katovich, M. A. (1988). Inauthentic identities, suspicion, and honor. In D. R. Maines & C. J. Couch (Eds.), Communication and social structure (pp. 113-129). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
37. Kendall, L. (1998). Recontextualizing "Cyberspace": Methodological Considerations for Online Research. In S. Jones (ed.), Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net (57-74). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
38. Kendall, L. (2002). Hanging out in the virtual pub: Masculinities and relationships online. Berkeley: University of California Press.
39. Koch, S. C., Mueller, B., Kruse, L., & Zumbach, J. (2005). Constructing gender in chat groups. Sex Roles, 53, 29-41.
40. Lee, M. (2006). What's missing in feminist research in new information and communication technologies? Feminist Media Studies, 6, 191-210.
41. Markham, A. (1998). Life online: Researching real experiences in virtual space. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
42. Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2010, July 7). "I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately": Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1461444810365313. Retrieved from http://nms.sagepub.com/content/ early/2010/06/22/1461444810 365313.abstract
43. Mason-Schrock, D. (1996). Transsexuals' narrative construction of the "true self." Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 176-192.
44. McIntosh, P. (1988). White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack. Retrieved from http://www.case.edu/president/aaction/UnpackingTheKnapsack.pdf.
45. Mead, G. H. (1967). Mind, self, & society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist (2nd ed.) Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
46. Miller, H. (1995). Goffman on the internet: The presentation of self in electronic life. Paper presented at the Embodied Knowledge and Virtual Space Conference. Retrieved from http://www.ntu.ac.uk/soc/psych/miller/goffman. htm-l
47. Mitchell, W. J. (2000). e-topia: "Urban life Jim, but not as we know it." Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Moore, W. L. (2007). Reproducing racism: White space, elite law schools, and racial inequality. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
49. Nakamura, L. (2002). Cybertypes: Race, ethnicity, and identity on the internet. New York: Routledge.
50. Nakamura, L. (2009). Don't hate the player, hate the game: The racialization of labor in the World of Warcraft. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 26, 128-144.
51. Nieckarz, Jr., P. P. (2005). Community in cyberspace? The role of the Internet in facilitating and maintaining a community of live music collecting and trading. City & Community, 4, 403-423.
52. Norris, P. (2004). The bridging and bonding role of online communities. In P. N. Howard & S. Jones (Eds.), Society online: The internet in context (pp. 31-42). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
53. Pearce, C., & Artemsia (2009). Communities of play: Emergent cultures in multiplayer games and virtual worlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Popova, M. (2007, November). Readers respond. Advertising Age, 18.
55. Powell, K. (2008). Drumming against the quiet: The sounds of Asian American identity in an amorphous landscape. Qualitative Inquiry, 14, 901-925.
56. Robinson, L. (2007). The cyberself: the self-ing project goes online, symbolic interaction in the digital age. New Media & Society, 9, 93-110.
57. Sharf, B. F. (1997). Communicating breast cancer on-line: Support and empowerment on the internet. Women and Health, 26, 63-82.
58. Shaw, D. F. (1997). Gay men and computer communication: A discourse of sex and identity in cyberspace. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Virtual culture: Identity & communication in cybersociety (pp. 133-145). London, UK: SAGE.
59. TV Tropes & Idioms. (n. d.). So bad it's good. Retrieved from http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/SoBadItsGood/Film
60. Simpson, M. (1974). Cognitive flexibility and social structure. Department of Sociology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX. Mimeographed.
61. Stafford, N. (2002). Bite me! An unofficial guide to the world of Buffy the Vampire Slayer (2nd ed.). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: ECW.
62. Strasser, T. (2002). The name game. Retrieved from http://www. jewishjournal.com/home/preview.php?id=8789).
63. Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings.
64. Subrahmanyam, K., Smahel, D., & Greenfield, P. (2006). Connecting developmental constructions to the internet: Identity presentation and sexual exploration in online teen chat rooms. Developmental Psychology, 42, 395-406.
65. Travers, A. (2000). Writing the public in cyberspace: Redefining inclusion on the net (American Popular History and Culture Series). New York: Garland.
66. Travers, M. (2009). New methods, old problems: A sceptical view of innovation in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 9, 161-179.
67. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
68. Tuszynski, S. (2006). IRL (In real life): Breaking down the binary of online versus offline social interaction (Dissertation). Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH. Retrieved from www.ohiolink.edu/etd/send-pdf.cgi? bgsu1143431168
69. Waters, M. (1990). Ethnic options: Choosing identities in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
70. Whitty, M. T. (2007). Revealing the "real" me, searching for the "actual" you: Presentations of self on an internet dating site. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1707-1723.
71. Whitty, M. T., & Buchannan, T. (2010). What's in a screen name? Attractiveness of different types of screen names used by online daters. International Journal of Internet Science, 5, 5-19.
72. Zurcher, L. (1977). The mutable self: A self-concept for social change. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
73. Zweerink, A., & Gatson, S. N. (2002). WWW. Buffy.com: Cliques, boundaries, and hierarchies in an internet community. In R. Wilcox & D. Lavery (Eds.), Fighting the forces: What's at stake in Buffy the Vampire Slayer (pp. 239-249). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.