The bridging and bonding role of online communities

Society Online: The Internet in Context

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 31-42

  Norris, Pippa ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78651526869     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781452229560.n2     Document Type: Chapter

References (19)

1. Bimber, B. (1998). The internet and political transformation: Populism, community, and accelerated pluralism. Polity, 31(1), 133-160. doi:10.2307/3235370 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3235370
2. Davis, R. (1999). The web of politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3. Edwards, B., & Foley, M. W. (1998). Civil society and social capital beyond Putnam. American Behavioral Scientist, 42, 124-139. doi:10.1177/0002764298042001010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764298042001010
4. Gaines, B. R., & Shaw, M. L. G. (2001). Human-computer interaction in online communities. Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology, 33(1), 3-15.
5. Hafner, K. (2001). The Well: A story of love, death, and real life in the seminal online community. New York: Carroll & Graf.
6. Horrigan, J., Rainie, L., & Fox, S. (2001). Online communities: Networks that nurture long-distance relationships and local ties (Pew Internet and American Life Project). [Online]. Retrieved April 15, 2003, from http://www.pewinternet.org.
7. Hill, K. A., & Hughes, J. E. (1998). Cyberpolitics: Citizen activism in the age of the internet. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield.
8. Holmes, D. (1997). Virtual politics: Identity and community in cyberspace. London: Sage.
9. Jones, S. (Ed.). (1998). Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting computer-mediated communication and community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452243689 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452243689
10. Kim, A. J. (2000). Community building on the Web. Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press.
11. McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (1998). Coming out in the age of the internet: Identity "demarginalization" through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 681-694. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.681
12. Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Portess, A., & Landholt, P. (1996). The downside of social capital. The American Prospect, 26, 18-21.
14. Preece, J. (2001). Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success. Behaviour & Information Technology, 20, 347-356. doi:10.1080/01449290110084683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01449290110084683
15. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Free Press.
16. Putnam, R. D. (2002). Introduction. In R. D.Putnam (Ed.), The dynamics of social capital. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
18. Schuler, D. (1996). New community networks: Wired for change. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
19. Tsagarousianou, R., Tambini, D., & Bryan, C. (1998). Cyberdemocracy. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203448847 http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203448847