6-n-Propylthiouracil taster status not related to reported cruciferous vegetable intake among ethnically diverse children

Nutrition Research

Volumn 31, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 594-600

  Baranowski, Tom ^a   Baranowski, Janice C ^a   Watson, Kathleen B ^a   Jago, Russell ^b   Islam, Noemi ^a   Beltran, Alicia ^a   Martin, Shelby J ^a   Nguyen, Nga ^c   Tepper, Beverly J ^d  

^a CHILDREN S NUTRITION RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^d RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

6 n Propylthiouracil; Children; Dietary intake; Food groups; PROP; Taste sensitivity; Vegetables

Indexed keywords

PROPYLTHIOURACIL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CALORIC INTAKE; CAUCASIAN; CHILD; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIETARY INTAKE; FEMALE; HIGH SCHOOL; HISPANIC; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIMARY SCHOOL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; VEGETABLE;

ADOLESCENT; BODY MASS INDEX; BRASSICACEAE; CHILD; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DIET; DIET RECORDS; ENERGY INTAKE; ETHNIC GROUPS; EXERCISE; FEMALE; FLORIDA; HUMANS; MALE; PHENYLTHIOUREA; PROPYLTHIOURACIL; SELF REPORT; TASTE; VEGETABLES;

EID: 80052965690     PISSN: 02715317     EISSN: 18790739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2011.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Duffy V.B., Davidson A.C., Kidd J.R., Kidd K.K., Speed W.C., Pakstis A.J., et al. Bitter receptor gene (TAS2R38), 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) bitterness and alcohol intake. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2004, 28:1629-1637.
2. Tepper B.J. 6-n-Propylthiouracil: a genetic marker for taste, with implications for food preference and dietary habits. Am J Hum Genet 1998, 63:1271-1276.
3. Tepper B.J., Nurse R.J. PROP taster status is related to fat perception and preference. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998, 855:802-804.
4. Tepper B.J. Nutritional implications of genetic taste variation: the role of PROP sensitivity and other taste phenotypes. Annu Rev Nutr 2008, 28:367-388.
5. Tepper B.J., White E.A., Koelliker Y., Lanzara C., d'Adamo P., Gasparini P. Genetic variation in taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil and its relationship to taste perception and food selection. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2009, 1170:126-139.
6. Keller K., Steinmann L., Nurse R., Tepper B. Genetic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil influences food preference and reported intake in preschool children. Appetite 2002, 38:3-12.
7. Lumeng J.C., Cardinal T.M., Sitto J.R., Kannan S. Ability to taste 6-n-propylthiouracil and BMI in low-income preschool-aged children. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008, 16:1522-1528.
8. Keller K.L., Tepper B. Inherited taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil in diet and body weight in children. Obes Res 2004, 12:904-912.
9. Cullen K.W., Watson K., Zakeri I. Relative reliability and validity of the Block Kids Questionnaire among youth aged 10 to 17 years. J Am Diet Assoc 2008, 108:862-866.
10. Caudwell P., Gibbons C., Hopkins M., Naslund E., King N., Finlayson G., et al. The influence of physical activity on appetite control: an experimental system to understand the relationship between exercise-induced energy expenditure and energy intake. Proc Nutr Soc 2011, 70:171-180.
11. Klesges L.M., Baranowski T., Beech B., Cullen K., Murray D.M., Rochon J., et al. Social desirability bias in self-reported dietary, physical activity and weight concerns measures in 8- to 10-year-old African-American girls: results from the Girls Health Enrichment Multisite Studies (GEMS). Prev Med 2004, 38(Suppl):S78-S87.
12. Hintze J. PASS 2008, NCSS, LLC 2008, Kaysville, Utah.
13. Tepper B.J., Christensen C.M., Cao J. Development of brief methods to classify individuals by PROP taster status. Physiol Behav 2001, 73:571-577.
14. Zhao L., Kirkmeyer S.V., Tepper B.J. A paper screening test to assess genetic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil. Physiol Behav 2003, 28:625-633.
15. Feskanich D., Sielaff B.H., Chong K., Buzzard I.M. Computerized collection and analysis of dietary intake information. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1989, 30:47-57.
16. Cullen K.W., Watson K., Himes J.H., Baranowski T., Rochon J., Waclawiw M.A., et al. Evaluation of quality control procedures for 24-hour dietary recalls: results for the Girls health Enrichment Multi-site Studies (GEMS). Prev Med 2004, 38:S14-S23.
17. Willett W. Nutritional epidemiology 1998, Oxford University Press, New York.
18. Lohman T.G., Roche A.F., Martorell R. Anthropometric standardization reference manual 1988, Human Kinetics Books, Champaign (Ill).
19. Kuczmarski R., Ogden C., Guo S. 2000 CDC growth charts for the United States: methods and development 2002, Hyattsville, MD; National Center for Health Statistics.
20. Murray D.M., Stevens J., Hannan P.J., Catellier D.J., Schmitz K.H., Dowda M., et al. School-level intraclass correlation for physical activity in sixth grade girls. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006, 38:926-936.
21. Hebert J.R., Ma M., Clemow L., Ockene I.S., Saperia G., Stanek E.J.I., et al. Gender differences in social desirability and social approval bias in dietary self-report. Am J Epidemiol 1997, 146:1046-1055.
22. Hebert J.R., Clemow L., Pbert L., Ockene I.S., Ockene J.K. Social desirability bias in dietary self-report may compromise the validity of dietary intake measures. Int J Epidemiol 1995, 24:389-398.
23. Dadds M.R., Perrin S., Yule W. Social desirability and self-reported anxiety in children: an analysis of the RCMAS Lie scale. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1998, 26:311-317.
24. Reynolds C.R., Paget K.O. National normative and reliability data for the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale. School Psych Rev 1983, 12:324-336.
25. Huang T.T., Roberts S.B., Howarth N.C., McCrory M.A. Effect of screening out implausible energy intake reports on relationships between diet and BMI. Obes Res 2005, 13:1205-1217.
26. McCrory M.A., Hajduk C.L., Roberts S.B. Procedures for screening out inaccurate reports of dietary energy intake. Public Health Nutr 2002, 5:873-882.
27. Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein, an amino acids, part I 2002, Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
28. Huang T.T., Howarth N.C., Lin B.H., Roberts S.B., McCrory M.A. Energy intake and meal portions: associations with BMI percentile in U.S. children. Obes Res 2004, 12:1875-1885.
29. Munoz K.A., Krebs-Smith S.M., Ballard-Barbash R., Cleveland L.E. Food intakes of US children and adolescents compared with recommendations. Pediatrics 1997, 100:323-329.
30. Cutler G.J., Flood A., Hannan P., Neumark-Sztainer D. Multiple sociodemographic and socioenvironmental characteristics are correlated with major patterns of dietary intake in adolescents. J Am Diet Assoc 2011, 111:230-240.
31. Gibson S. Trends in energy and sugar intakes and body mass index between 1983 and 1997 among children in Great Britain. J Hum Nutr Diet 2010, 23:371-381.
32. Baranowski J.C., Baranowski T., Beltran A., Watson K.B., Jago R., Callie M., et al. 6-n-Propylthiouracil sensitivity and obesity status among ethnically diverse children. Public Health Nutr 2010, 13:1587-1592.
33. Krebs-Smith S.M., Guenther P.M., Subar A.F., Kirkpatrick S.I., Dodd K.W. Americans do not meet federal dietary recommendations. J Nutr 2010, 140:1832-1838.
34. Bell K.I., Tepper B.J. Short-term vegetable intake by young children classified by 6-n-propylthoiuracil bitter-taste phenotype. Am J Clin Nutr 2006, 84:245-251.
35. Anliker J.A., Bartoshuk L., Ferris A.M., Hooks L.D. Children's food preferences and genetic sensitivity to the bitter taste of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP). Am J Clin Nutr 1991, 54:316-320.
36. Turnbull B., Matisoo-Smith E. Taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil predicts acceptance of bitter-tasting spinach in 3-6 year-old children. Am J Clin Nutr 2002, 76:1101-1105.
37. Tepper B., Keller K., Ullrich N. Genetic variation in taste and preferences for bitter and pungent foods: implications for chronic disease risk. Challenges in Taste Chemistry and Biology 2003, Washington, DC; American Chemical Society. T. Hofmann, C. Ho, W. Pickenhagen (Eds.).
38. Nunally J.C., Bernstein I.H. Psychometric theory 1994, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York. 3rd ed.
39. Evertts A.G., Zee B.M., Garcia B.A. Modern approaches for investigating epigenetic signaling pathways. J Appl Physiol 2010, 109:927-933.
40. Ledoux T., Watson K., Nguyen N., Cullen K., Thompson D., Jago R., et al. Measurement bias and confounding affect the association between adiposity and diet. J Am Coll Nutr 2011, [submitted].