Optimizing the response surface for producing ethanol from avicel by Brevibacillus strain AHPC8120

Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 787-792

  Li, Ang Hsuan ^a   Lin, Chi Wen ^b   Tran, Dang Thuan ^c  

^a NATIONAL CHUNG HSING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL YUNLIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Brevibacillus borstelensis strain AHPC8120; Cellulose; Ethanol; Response surface methodology (RSM)

Indexed keywords

BREVIBACILLUS BORSTELENSIS STRAIN AHPC8120; CARBON SOURCE; ETHANOL YIELD; NAPIERGRASS; OPTIMAL GROWTH; RESPONSE SURFACE; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY;

ACETIC ACID; CARBON; CELLULOSE; COMPOSTING; GLUCOSE; OPTIMIZATION; PH EFFECTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

ETHANOL;

EID: 80052961456     PISSN: 18761070     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2011.02.009     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Balusu R., Paduru R.R., Kuravi S.K., Seenayya G., Reddy G. Optimization of Critical Medium Components Using Response Surface Methodology for Ethanol Production from Cellulosic Biomass by Clostridium thermocellum SS19. Process Biochem. 2005, 40:3025.
2. Banerjee U.C., Chisti Y., Young M.M. Spectrophotometric Determination of Mycelial Biomass. Biotechniques 1993, 7:313.
3. Cao L., Kong Q., Zhang A., Chen X. Overexpression of SYM1 in a gpdDelta Mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with Modified Ammonium Assimilation for Optimization of Ethanol Production. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Engrs. 2010, 41:2.
4. Coninck D., Bouquelet J., Dumortier S., Duyme V., Verdier V., Denantes I. Industrial Media and Fermentation Processes for Improved Growth and Protease Production by Tetrahymena thermophila. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000, 24:285.
5. Dien B.S., Cotta M.A., Jeffries T.W. Bacteria engineered for fuel ethanol production: current status. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003, 63:258.
6. FitzPatrick M., Champagne P., Cunningham M.F., Whitney R.A. A Biorefinery Processing Perspective: Treatment of Lignocellulosic Materials for the Production of Value-added Products. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:8915.
7. Gnansounou E., Dauriat A. Techno-economic Analysis of Lignocellulosic Ethanol: A Review. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:4980.
8. Goldemberg J., Coelho S.T., Guardabassi P. The Sustainability of Ethanol Production from Sugarcane. Energ. Policy 2008, 36:2086.
9. Golias H., Dumsday G.J., Stanley G.A., Pamment N.B. Evaluation of a recombinant Klebsiella oxytoca strain for ethanol production from cellulose by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation: comparison with native cellobiose-utilising yeast strains and performance in co-culture with thermotolerant yeast and Zymomonas mobilis. J. Biotechnol. 2002, 96:155.
10. Huang W.H., Wang F.S. Kinetic Modeling of Batch Fermentation for Mixed-sugar to Ethanol Production. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Engrs. 2010, 41:434.
11. Kato S., Haruta S., Cui Z.J., Ishii M., Igarashi Y. Stable Coexistence of Five Bacterial Strains as a Cellulose-degrading Community. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71:7099.
12. Krishna S.H., Prasanthi K., Chowdary G.V., Ayyanna C. Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation of Pretreated Sugarcane Leaves to Ethanol. Process Biochem. 1988, 33:825.
13. Liang Y., Yesuf J., Schmitt S., Bender K., Bozzola J. Study of Cellulases from a Newly Isolated Thermophilic and Cellulolytic Brevibacillus sp. Strain JXL. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 36:961.
14. Lin C.W.D.T., Tran C.Y., Lai Y.P.I., Wu C.H. Response Surface Optimization for Ethanol Production from Pennisetum Alopecoider by Klebsiella oxytoca THLC0409. Biomass Bioenergy 2010, 34:1922.
15. Lynd L.R., Weimer P.J., van Zyl W.H., Pretorius I.S. Microbial Cellulose Utilization: Fundamentals and Biotechnology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2002, 66:506.
16. Lynd L.R., van Zyl W.H., McBride E.J., Laser M. Consolidated Bioprocessing of Cellulosic Biomass: An Update. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2005, 6:577.
17. Mandels M., Reese E.T. Induction of Cellulase in Trichoderma viride as Influenced by Carbon Sources and Metals. J. Bacteriol. 1957, 73:269.
18. Mei X., Liu R., Shen F., Wu H. Optimization of Fermentation Conditions for the Production of Ethanol from Stalk Juice of Sweet Sorghum by Immobilized Yeast Using Response Surface Methodology. Energy Fuels 2009, 23:487.
19. Mielenz J.R. Ethanol Production from Biomass: Technology and Commercialization Status. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2001, 4:324.
20. Miyazaki K., Irbis C., Takada J., Matsuura A. An Ability of Isolated Strains to Efficiently Cooperate in Ethanolic Fermentation of Agricultural Plant Refuse Under Initially Aerobic Thermophilic Conditions: Oxygen Deletion Process Appended to Consolidated Bioprocessing (CBP). Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:1768.
21. Montgomery D.C. Design and Analysis of Experiments 2005, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
22. Panagiotou G., Christakopoulos P., Olsson L. Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of cellulose by Fusarium oxysporum F3-growth characteristics and metabolite profiling. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2005, 36:693.
23. Popa O., Babeanu N., Vamanu A., Vamanu E. The Utilization of the Response Surface Methodology for the Optimization of Cultivation Medium and Growth Parameters in the Cultivation of the Yeast Strain S. cerevisiae 3.20 on ethanol. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 6:2700.
24. Puri S., Beg Q.K., Gupta R. Optimization of Alkaline Protease Production from Bacillus sp. by Response Surface Methodology. Curr. Microbiol. 2002, 44:286.
25. Shigechi H., Fujita Y., Koh J., Ueda M., Fukuda H., Kondo A. Energy-Saving Direct Ethanol Production from Low-Temperature-Cooked Corn Starch Using a Cell-Surface Engineered Yeast Strain Co-Displaying Glucoamylase and α-Amylase. Biochem. Eng. J. 2004, 18:149.
26. Stevenson D.M., Weimer P.J. Isolation and Characterization of a Trichoderma Strain Capable of Fermenting Cellulose to Ethanol. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 59:721.
27. Wang Q., Ma H., Xu W., Gong L., Zhang W., Zou D. Short Communication: Ethanol Production from Kitchen Garbage Using Response Surface Methodology. Biochem. Eng. J. 2008, 39:604.
28. Xiros C., Topakas E., Katapodis P., Christakopoulos P. Valuation of Fusarium oxysporum as an enzyme factory for the hydrolysis of brewer's spent grain with improved biodegradability for ethanol production. Ind. Crops Prod. 2008, 28:213.
29. Xiros C., Topakas E., Katapodis P., Christakopoulos P. Hydrolysis and fermentation of brewer's spent grain by Neurospora crassa. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:5427.